Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Alltel / July 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What cities is Alltel in?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bg - 02 Jul 2003 06:51 GMT
This is one carrier I've never heard of?
Justa Lurker - 02 Jul 2003 23:37 GMT
It was Tue, 01 Jul 2003 22:51:32 -0700, and bg <bg@sd.com>
 wrote in alt.cellular.alltel:
| This is one carrier I've never heard of?

http://www.alltel.com/

Alltel's is #7 in the nation (has been for several years).

JL
Danny Grant - 03 Jul 2003 07:18 GMT
It depends on where you are at....I am in eastern NC and Alltel has coverage
basically in all the major cities.

Chekotay

> This is one carrier I've never heard of?
AL904a - 03 Jul 2003 13:27 GMT
>This is one carrier I've never heard of?

Alltel is big throughout the state of Florida.

Al in Jacksonville Beach, Florida
Forum for Florida Road Warriors at http://www.wireless-florida.com
Forum for Nextel Users at http://www.nextel-user.com
cam leblanc - 03 Jul 2003 13:28 GMT
ALLTEL has offices in Florida, Michigan, South Carolina, North Carolina,
Ohio, Arkansas, Louisiana, Arizona, and a slew of other states. We have
roaming arrangements with other major carriers to provide a large
national footprint as well as a "no roaming/coverage everywhere" plan.

bg <bg@sd.com> wrote in article <3F0272E4.BAE59694@sd.com>:
> This is one carrier I've never heard of?
Larry - 03 Jul 2003 14:37 GMT
I'm a Verizon customer, anxiously awaiting number portability.
Verizon HAD in-market roaming over to Sprint PCS first, then Alltel on
a tri-mode phone.  But, quietly without notifying the customers, that
roaming was deleted from all PRLs in all plans a year or two ago.  The
phones now say NO SERVICE in the holes in Verizon's coverage in their
own markets, even though you can see the Sprint or Alltel tower from
where you're standing.  It sucks.  FCC should do a broadcast-style
"Proof of Performance" test on every carrier, every year, to ensure
they are providing smooth coverage over their licensed area, handing
out fines and forcing them to buy the necessary resources from other
carriers until they are in compliance.  The "build-out-excuse" time is
well past for all carriers, especially old 800 Mhz carriers on the air
for 20 years.  Failure to comply simply results in failure to renew
their licenses.  It's NOT "their" airwaves, you know.

After being a customer in Charleston, SC, since the 2nd Cellular One
tower was installed and I gave up my beloved IMTS mobile phone
spending thousands and thousands of dollars on airtime and equipment
since cellular's introduction, I'm ready to take my number and churn,
soon that I can.

QUESTION - Does Alltel permit CDMA roaming to other carriers INSIDE
its licensed coverage area in Eastern SC when Alltel's system fails to
provide service to its customers?

If the answer is yes, there is absolutely no reason to stay with
Verizon Wireless after the number portability shenanegans it has
flip-flopped on becomes a reality.  I don't care which provider I use
for my telephone service.  I do care, and have put up with a lot, to
keep my number thousands of my customers know by heart.  Number
portability will give me the opportunity to find something that's
better for me.  If Alltel will provide service in Charleston, SC, AND
allow roaming into Sprint PCS and Verizon Wireless where IT fails to
provide service, there is no downside to churning to Alltel,
whatsoever.  As Verizon's system is larger, if Alltel refuses to
in-market roam in holes in its coverage, there is no reason to switch
because Verizon DOES have a larger, more extensive system.

>ALLTEL has offices in Florida, Michigan, South Carolina, North Carolina,
>Ohio, Arkansas, Louisiana, Arizona, and a slew of other states. We have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>[posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]

Larry

Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
Bill Roland - 04 Jul 2003 00:53 GMT
My family and I were visiting Charleston, SC a couple of weeks ago, Alltel
phones, always had a good signal.  Pretty much from the water to Goose
Creek, never had any trouble using Alltel.  Same thing goes for Savannah, it
worked fine there too.  I don't remember what kind of coverage we got in
Yemassee/Beaufort though.  I don't recall any trouble.

> I'm a Verizon customer, anxiously awaiting number portability.
> Verizon HAD in-market roaming over to Sprint PCS first, then Alltel on
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
> You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
royc - 04 Jul 2003 04:20 GMT
Alltel also blocks access to Sprint, US Cellular, Verizon and other
small CDMA carriers in some markets.  I believe your area is tightly
controlled by Alltel's PRL to use only Alltel.  For specific answers
for your home area, go to:

http://www.justalurker.com/00603.html

Find the group of SID's for your area and note the ones that are
marked NEG.  The PRL will not use these (NEG) carriers even if their
signal is strong and Alltel's is absent.  Your phone will simply say
"no service".  In fairness to Verizon, they have removed some other
carriers SID's from their PRL, but none are marked negative.  Most
Verizon phones can be manually switched to A or B band to find a
carrier when service is not available through the PRL.  I'd rather be
able to make a call and pay roaming than not be able to make the call
at all.

royc

> I'm a Verizon customer, anxiously awaiting number portability.
> Verizon HAD in-market roaming over to Sprint PCS first, then Alltel on
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> in-market roam in holes in its coverage, there is no reason to switch
> because Verizon DOES have a larger, more extensive system.
Justa Lurker - 04 Jul 2003 07:19 GMT
It was 3 Jul 2003 20:20:30 -0700, and clouston@sprynet.com
 (royc) wrote in alt.cellular.alltel:
| Alltel also blocks access to Sprint, US Cellular, Verizon
| and other small CDMA carriers in some markets.
...
| Find the group of SID's for your area and note the ones
| that are marked NEG.

To be fair, marking a PCS system as NEG has the same basic
effect as not including it at all.  If a PCS system is not
in the PRL, your phone won't find it and (unless one sets
up the phone specifically for that system) can't use it.

There are a lot of cellular SIDs marked NEG.
In Larry's Charleston area the preferences are:
AllTel's Own Systems (equally preferred):
01652, 00156, 03226, 00350, 00116, 00182, 01640, 01650,
00114, 00578, 01540, 00100, 00376, 01542, 01544, 01536,
01532, 01534, 02038, 01538, 01528, 00144, 00142, 01530,
00368, 01546, 00074
Verizon Wireless (in this GEO):
00179, 00093

*** THE REST ARE MARKED NEG ***
NEG PCS carriers:
05386, 05586, 05618, 04395, 04857, 04693, 04381
plus   04376  SprintPCS - Charlotte NC

NEG Cellular Carriers:
Triton PCS License Company LLC
01645
United States Cellular Corporation
00599, 01541, 00393
Western Wireless
01643
Verizon Wireless
00069, 00095, 00299, 00349, 02115, 00189, 00127, 00377

So I suppose that's the answer to Larry's question:
| QUESTION - Does Alltel permit CDMA roaming to other
| carriers INSIDE its licensed coverage area in Eastern
| SC when Alltel's system fails to provide service to
| its customers?

No.  Larry's favorite SPCS is out, plus other systems.

JL
Larry - 04 Jul 2003 17:18 GMT
Thanks Lurk.  00127 is the Charleston Verizon system so they are
blocking roaming just like Verizon is.......dammit.

Lied to again......

>It was 3 Jul 2003 20:20:30 -0700, and clouston@sprynet.com
>  (royc) wrote in alt.cellular.alltel:
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>JL

Larry

Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
Justa Lurker - 07 Jul 2003 05:53 GMT
It was Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:18:33 GMT, and nospam@home.com
 (Larry) wrote in alt.cellular.alltel:
| Thanks Lurk.  00127 is the Charleston Verizon system so
| they are blocking roaming just like Verizon is.......

No, Verizon isn't blocking Alltel's system, they are just
not including it.  There is a difference.  Not including
the system allows for it to be used absolutely last. Marking
it NEG (as Alltel did with VZW's 00127) means no use even
if it were the last SID on earth.

| Lied to again......

Really?  When did Alltel tell you you could roam on VZW 00127
in the Charleston area?

JL
Larry - 08 Jul 2003 01:37 GMT
>Really?  When did Alltel tell you you could roam on VZW 00127
>in the Charleston area?
>
>JL

Yes, they did.....a sales wienie

73 de Larry W4CharlestonSC
RF radiation hazards since 1957...
Larry - 04 Jul 2003 17:17 GMT
Thanks for the info.  Unfortunately, you can't force the Verizon V60i
to STAY in a working system so you can RECEIVE calls when Verizon's
service is useless.

I still say all carriers should be subjected to yearly "proof of
performance" testing in their licensed areas and given notification by
FCC of the deficiencies and given a reasonable, but not infinite, time
to correct these deficiencies.  During the rectification period, they
should be forced to buy airtime on other carriers for their screwed
customers to use until they can come into compliance.

It's way past time for the damned FCC to start DOING ITS JOB for the
customers who pay their salaries.

>Alltel also blocks access to Sprint, US Cellular, Verizon and other
>small CDMA carriers in some markets.  I believe your area is tightly
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>> in-market roam in holes in its coverage, there is no reason to switch
>> because Verizon DOES have a larger, more extensive system.

Larry

Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
Benjamin P. Volk - 06 Jul 2003 03:38 GMT
you can check out their coverage maps as well as the coverage maps of most
other major service providers at www.cooltechgear.com

Sincerely,
Webmasters @ www.cooltechgear.com

> This is one carrier I've never heard of?
Bill Roland - 06 Jul 2003 06:18 GMT
Your section on AMPS service is laughably inacurate.  AMPS is more reliable
than digital.  It works when your cheap "camera phone" says "NO SERVICE."
.6 watt is no match for 3 watts.  Nice try though, it was very entertaining.

> you can check out their coverage maps as well as the coverage maps of most
> other major service providers at www.cooltechgear.com
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> > This is one carrier I've never heard of?
Benjamin P. Volk - 06 Jul 2003 06:44 GMT
Enjoy it while it lasts in your area.  Service providers are eliminating it,
making it's coverage laughable now.  You can still use it in rural areas
where service providers don't wish to invest money into upgrading their
towers, but in many metro areas, you will find yourself unable to place a
call on an analog-only phone.

Sincerely,
Webmasters @ www.cooltechgear.com

> Your section on AMPS service is laughably inacurate.  AMPS is more reliable
> than digital.  It works when your cheap "camera phone" says "NO SERVICE."
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> > > This is one carrier I've never heard of?
Bill Roland - 12 Jul 2003 22:49 GMT
No, I'm pretty sure that the FCC says they have to continue offering it
until at least 2008.  Sorry.

> Enjoy it while it lasts in your area.  Service providers are eliminating it,
> making it's coverage laughable now.  You can still use it in rural areas
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > >
> > > > This is one carrier I've never heard of?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.