Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Alltel / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Final 2nd Quarter Carrier Results

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
SMS - 10 Aug 2006 07:55 GMT
T-Mobile reported on August 10th (in Europe) so here are the final
statistice for the five largest U.S. wireless carriers.

Subscribers (millions)
        1Q2005  2Q2005  3Q2005 4Q2005  1Q2006  2Q2006
Alltel    8.8     9.1    10.4    10.6   10.8    11.1
Cingular 50.5    51.6    52.3    54.1   55.8    57.3
Sprint   43.0    44.4    45.6    47.6   51.0    51.7
T-Mobile 18.3    19.2    20.3    21.7   22.7    23.3
Verizon  45.5    47.4    49.3    51.3   53.0    54.8
Total   166.1   171.7   177.9   185.3  193.3   198.2

Net Additions (millions)
        1Q2005  2Q2005  3Q2005 4Q2005  1Q2006  2Q2006
Alltel           0.30    1.30    0.15    0.17    0.27
Cingular         1.10    0.70    1.80    1.70    1.50
Sprint           1.40    1.22    1.99    3.40    0.70
T-Mobile         0.86    1.10    1.40    1.00    0.61
Verizon          1.90    1.90    2.00    1.70    1.80

Market Share
         1Q2005  2Q2005   3Q2005  4Q2005 1Q2006  2Q2006
Alltel    5.30%   5.30%    5.85%   5.74%   5.59%   5.59%
Cingular 30.40%   30.05%  29.40%  29.19%  28.87%  28.91%
Sprint   25.88%   25.86%  25.64%  25.68%  26.38%  26.09%
T-Mobile 11.04%   11.18%  11.41%  11.71%  11.74%  11.76%
Verizon  27.39%   27.61%  27.71%  27.68%  27.42%  27.65%
Total   100.00%  100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Market Share Change
                2Q2005  3Q2005  4Q2005  1Q2006  2Q2006
Alltel            0.00%  0.55%   -0.11% -0.15%   0.00%
Cingular         -0.34% -0.66%   -0.21% -0.32%   0.05%
Sprint           -0.02% -0.22%    0.04%  0.70%  -0.30%
T-Mobile          0.14%  0.23%    0.30%  0.03%   0.01%
Verizon           0.22%  0.10%   -0.03% -0.26%   0.23%

ARPU
         1Q2005  2Q2005  3Q2005  4Q2005 1Q2006  2Q2006
Alltel    48.94   50.55   53.78   52.13   50.9   52.54
Cingular  49.59   50.43   49.65   48.86   48.48  48.84
Sprint    61.00   62.00   65.00   63.00   62.00  61.00
T-Mobile  54.00   54.00   53.00   52.00   51.00  52.00
Verizon   49.03   50.34   50.13   49.36   48.67  49.71

Churn
         1Q2005  2Q2005  3Q2005  4Q2005 1Q2006  2Q2006
Alltel    1.7%    2.0%    1.9%    2.2%    1.7%    1.9%
Cingular  2.2%    2.2%    2.3%    2.1%    1.9%    1.7%
Sprint    2.5%    2.2%    2.1%    2.1%    2.1%    2.1%
T-Mobile  2.3%    2.3%    2.4%    2.3%    2.1%    2.2%
Verizon   1.3%    1.2%    1.3%    1.2%    1.2%    1.1%

As you can see, Verizon is the only carrier that is really doing well by
all metrics. Verizon has the lowest churn, the highest number of net
additions, an increasing ARPU, and a big increase in market share.
user@domain.invalid - 10 Aug 2006 22:27 GMT
> T-Mobile reported on August 10th (in Europe) so here are the final
> statistice for the five largest U.S. wireless carriers.

> As you can see, Verizon is the only carrier that is really doing well by
> all metrics. Verizon has the lowest churn, the highest number of net
> additions, an increasing ARPU, and a big increase in market share.

How about profit for each company?  To me that is the most important number.

-Jason
SMS - 11 Aug 2006 00:14 GMT
>> T-Mobile reported on August 10th (in Europe) so here are the final
>> statistice for the five largest U.S. wireless carriers.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> How about profit for each company?  To me that is the most important
> number.

It's not possible to know the profits of the wireless portion of
carriers like Cingular and Verizon.

The accepted metrics are net additions, churn, ARPU, and market share,
as well as the trends for each of those metrics over time. And of course
all the metrics need to be looked at simultaneously, since a carrier
could drop their pants on price to increase net additions and market
share, or give away the store by their retention department offering
unprofitable deals to reduce churn.
John L - 11 Aug 2006 14:59 GMT
>> How about profit for each company?  To me that is the most important
>> number.
>
>It's not possible to know the profits of the wireless portion of
>carriers like Cingular and Verizon.

I don't see why not.

Cingular is a pure wireless operator and it files 10K and 10Q with the
SEC even though it is owned by T and BLS.  The latest 10Q says that
for the first six months of 2006 they had revenue of $18.2 billion,
operating income of $1.8M, and net income of $894M, with most of the
difference between the last two being interest expense and income
taxes.  Compared to the first six months of last year, operating
income tripled and net income swung from loss to profit.

VZW is also a pure wireless operator, a partership between Verizon and
Vodafone that also files 10K and 10Q.  Its latest 10Q says that for
the first six months of 2006 revenue was $18 billion, operating income
$4.5G, net income $3.7B, all somewhat better than last year.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
Isaiah Beard - 11 Aug 2006 18:41 GMT
> I don't see why not.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the first six months of 2006 revenue was $18 billion, operating income
> $4.5G, net income $3.7B, all somewhat better than last year.

Interesting.  Can you post a link to these 10-K and 10-Q's?

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

John L - 12 Aug 2006 01:35 GMT
>Interesting.  Can you post a link to these 10-K and 10-Q's?

I found them each in about 30 seconds on the Cingular and VZW web sites.

All SEC filings are available at http://edgar.sec.gov

R's,
John
Larry - 11 Aug 2006 12:45 GMT
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in news:44dad875$0$96151
$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:

> Subscribers (millions)
>          1Q2005  2Q2005  3Q2005 4Q2005  1Q2006  2Q2006
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Verizon  45.5    47.4    49.3    51.3   53.0    54.8
> Total   166.1   171.7   177.9   185.3  193.3   198.2

I just KNEW there was a reason why Alltel is never busy or drops calls!

I must have the cell almost to my self!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.