No.
D-Amps was ver 1 of TDMA.
So what the specs are saying, is that the phone is capable of 800 and
1900Mhz TDMA and AMPS ( analog ) 800Mhz.
Scotty
> If a phone is described as "AT&T Compatible D-AMPS 800/1900/AMPS 800", does
> this mean it's definately TDMA or could that apply to CDMA also?
>
> Thanks.
Andrew Shepherd - 29 Mar 2004 07:00 GMT
> No.
>
> D-Amps was ver 1 of TDMA.
> So what the specs are saying, is that the phone is capable of 800 and
> 1900Mhz TDMA and AMPS ( analog ) 800Mhz.
You are partially correct. D-AMPS is a somewhat archaic term
typically used in as a stand-in for the initial version of TDMA,
IS-54. NADC (North American Digital Cellular) is another name.
IS-136 is the current version - if there truly is such a thing - of
TDMA. The primary distinction between IS-54 & IS-136 is that IS-54
replaced the AMPS AVC (analog voice channel) w/ a DQPSK-modulated TDMA
DTCH (digital traffic channel) but retained the non-TDMA AMPS control
channels, while IS-136 finally replaced the AMPS control channels w/ a
DQPSK-modulated TDMA DCCH (digital control channel).
Relevant to the initial poster, IS-54 was never deployed at 1900 MHz
as AMPS control channels are non-existant in the PCS band. Thus, if
the phone is TDMA 1900 capable, then it is IS-136.
Andrew
--
Andrew Shepherd
cinema@ku.edu
cinema@sprintpcs.com
http://www.ku.edu/home/cinema/
>If a phone is described as "AT&T Compatible D-AMPS 800/1900/AMPS 800", does
>this mean it's definately TDMA or could that apply to CDMA also?
It's TDMA not CDMA. Such models as Ericsson LX677 are called "D-AMPS"
buy can be used on the TDMA network.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply