Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / ATT Wireless / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ATTWS GSM Upstate NY

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Karen - 28 Mar 2004 17:01 GMT
I am a T-Mobile user.  T-Mobile coverage in Upstate NY is a bit thin.  I
have been looking at ATTWS and their GSM (1900/850) service.  They seem to
have much better coverage, and all the same features and benefits of GSM
including international roaming at competitive rates.  Can anyone using the
service state how the service actually performs?
Wirelessjuan - 29 Mar 2004 00:18 GMT
>I am a T-Mobile user.  T-Mobile coverage in Upstate NY is a bit thin.  I
> have been looking at ATTWS and their GSM (1900/850) service.  They seem to
> have much better coverage, and all the same features and benefits of GSM
> including international roaming at competitive rates.  Can anyone using
> the
> service state how the service actually performs?

Not sure what map you are looking at but ATT doesn't have much coverage in
upstate NY.  Look at Cingular they have much better coverage in that area.
Yaowu Xu - 29 Mar 2004 02:20 GMT
If you choose a ATTWS local plan, the coverage in upstate NY would
include all those Cingular coverage.

I changed from Verizon and so far ATTWS seems fine to me. Verizon has be
best coverage overall, but does not has anything for my house.

>>I am a T-Mobile user.  T-Mobile coverage in Upstate NY is a bit thin.  I
>>have been looking at ATTWS and their GSM (1900/850) service.  They seem to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Not sure what map you are looking at but ATT doesn't have much coverage in
> upstate NY.  Look at Cingular they have much better coverage in that area.
Dave Botsch - 30 Mar 2004 01:10 GMT
Judging from the maps, it looks like for the most part, where one ha
service, the other does not. It really irks me that we cannot roam in
those areas since T-Mobile has zilch.

Anyway, Cingular seems to have the central part of the state covered -
Syracuse and surrounding area, while ATTWS seems to have the lower partof
the state covered (Elmira, Corning, surrounding areas). There is even some
DobsonUS coverage in that area.

> If you choose a ATTWS local plan, the coverage in upstate NY would
> include all those Cingular coverage.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> Not sure what map you are looking at but ATT doesn't have much coverage in
>> upstate NY.  Look at Cingular they have much better coverage in that area.

Signature

********************************
David William Botsch
dwb7@cornell.edu
********************************

Robert M. - 30 Mar 2004 01:22 GMT
> Judging from the maps, it looks like for the most part, where one ha
> service, the other does not. It really irks me that we cannot roam in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the state covered (Elmira, Corning, surrounding areas). There is even some
> DobsonUS coverage in that area.

Despite all promising to honor an Industry Code for Consumers, no
carrier has yet published a proper map showing coverage that includes
their dead zones.
Scott Stephenson - 30 Mar 2004 01:27 GMT
> Despite all promising to honor an Industry Code for Consumers, no
> carrier has yet published a proper map showing coverage that includes
> their dead zones.

Then why do you routinely use them as a refernece when answering coverage
questions inthe alt.cellular groups?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.