> No secret. I guess I just thought the guy might actually read and
> understand what he's doing when he signs up and not expect something for
> nothing.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion. I just made the point that
trials are availble from carriers as something the OP could investigate.
I suppose I could have asked for their address, driven over, picked them
up and taken them to a carrier and read the terms aloud to them, but the
fact that they posted here led me to believe they were reasonably
intelligent and didn't need that level of handholding.
From:Robert M.
rmarkoff@msn.com
>> No secret. I guess I just thought the guy might actually read and
>> understand what he's doing when he signs up and not expect something
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> get a trial period", as that doen't tell the full story, and you are
> being totally disingenuous in your response, about trials.
Robert M. - 03 Apr 2004 22:34 GMT
> You're certainly entitled to your opinion. I just made the point that
> trials are availble from carriers as something the OP could investigate.
> I suppose I could have asked for their address, driven over, picked them
> up and taken them to a carrier and read the terms aloud to them, but the
> fact that they posted here led me to believe they were reasonably
> intelligent and didn't need that level of handholding.
Its not a matter of ahand holding, and you are entirely disingenuous to
say that. Most folks are shocked to learn that they will be charged a
full months service for a 4 day trial, on top of an activation fee.
So it adds up to ~ $100. And its trivial to mention that in passing.
Convienient not to mention it, isn't it.
BruceR - 03 Apr 2004 23:09 GMT
Convenient for whom? I couldn't care less whether ATT makes a dime or
not. I don't work for them, own their stock or receive any remuneration
from them in any way, shape or form.
From:Robert M.
rmarkoff@msn.com
>> You're certainly entitled to your opinion. I just made the point that
>> trials are availble from carriers as something the OP could
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> So it adds up to ~ $100. And its trivial to mention that in passing.
> Convienient not to mention it, isn't it.
Robert M. - 03 Apr 2004 23:42 GMT
> Convenient for whom? I couldn't care less whether ATT makes a dime or
> not. I don't work for them, own their stock or receive any remuneration
> from them in any way, shape or form.
Then quit telling people how easy it is to "test" out an AT&T phone
without mentioning it'll cost them upwards of $100. or least quit
bellyaching if I fill in the details you omit.
BruceR - 03 Apr 2004 23:50 GMT
never bellyached... never said it was free... never even said it was
easy... just an available option. Who on earth would expect something
to be free?
BTW, I have to say that I really do enjoy our banter. Thank you!
From:Robert M.
rmarkoff@msn.com
>> Convenient for whom? I couldn't care less whether ATT makes a dime or
>> not. I don't work for them, own their stock or receive any
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> without mentioning it'll cost them upwards of $100. or least quit
> bellyaching if I fill in the details you omit.
Robert M. - 04 Apr 2004 00:08 GMT
> never bellyached... never said it was free... never even said it was
> easy... just an available option. Who on earth would expect something
> to be free?
>
> BTW, I have to say that I really do enjoy our banter. Thank you!
You're welcome, I appreciate discussion with someone who doesn't resort
to insults. A lot of apologists are like that at the Sprint PCS group,
who quickly resort to 4 letter words.