cell phone service

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

alan - 04 Apr 2004 19:03 GMT

which company is better verizon wireless, att wireless, or sprint pcs (2
lines)

which is the best deal and has the best coverage in the U.S.

Reply to this Message

Shawn - 04 Apr 2004 23:26 GMT

> which company is better verizon wireless, att wireless, or sprint pcs (2
> lines)
>
> which is the best deal and has the best coverage in the U.S.

Check out AT&T on or after April 18. On the national plan (NOT DOR)
anywhere your phone works is your home market. Additional lines are $9.99
per month per line (added to a $39.99 or higher rate plan) and with a 2yr
agreement you get unlimited mobile 2 mobile as well as unlimited nights and
weekends.

Reply to this Message

BruceR - 04 Apr 2004 23:36 GMT

How does that then differ from DOR?

From:Shawn
sbainer@NOSPAMcolumbus.rr.com

>> which company is better verizon wireless, att wireless, or sprint
>> pcs (2 lines)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> with a 2yr agreement you get unlimited mobile 2 mobile as well as
> unlimited nights and weekends.

Reply to this Message

shawnb - 05 Apr 2004 00:33 GMT

> How does that then differ from DOR?
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > with a 2yr agreement you get unlimited mobile 2 mobile as well as
> > unlimited nights and weekends.

DOR doesn't include unlimited night and weekends for free, unlimited mobile
to mobile for free, can't have lines added to it and doesn't have a plan
lower than $59.99 for 450 total minutes. The $39.99 national will have 450
anytime, unlimited M2M, unlimited N&W and you can add a line for $9.99 more
per month.

Reply to this Message

BruceR - 05 Apr 2004 00:37 GMT

So then why would anybody select DOR? If I understand the offer,
National Plan works anyplace the phones work (I assume in the USA only)
which is the same coverage as DOR. Will DOR go away?

From:shawnb
shawnb1824@dontspammeyahoo.com

>> How does that then differ from DOR?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> national will have 450 anytime, unlimited M2M, unlimited N&W and you
> can add a line for $9.99 more per month.

Reply to this Message

shawnb - 05 Apr 2004 00:35 GMT

> So then why would anybody select DOR? If I understand the offer,
> National Plan works anyplace the phones work (I assume in the USA only)
> which is the same coverage as DOR. Will DOR go away?

Correct, DOR (in its current form) is going away. You will only have to
choose between local and national. Pick local if you rarely travel outside
your home state because the plans will include more anytime minutes. Choose
national if you travel at all outside your home state.

Reply to this Message

BruceR - 05 Apr 2004 01:20 GMT

OK, now it makes sense to me. That makes it a VERY good deal.

From:shawnb
shawnb1824@dontspammeyahoo.com

>> So then why would anybody select DOR? If I understand the offer,
>> National Plan works anyplace the phones work (I assume in the USA
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> anytime minutes. Choose national if you travel at all outside your
> home state.

Reply to this Message

John S. - 05 Apr 2004 02:17 GMT

>How does that then differ from DOR?

Digital One Rate is their plan that also allows roaming on any of their roaming
partners without additional cost. Any place the phone works is part of your
plan with DOR.

>On the national plan

You have to be on their (AT&T WS) network.

--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net

Reply to this Message

BruceR - 05 Apr 2004 02:50 GMT

I thought the original post said that that's the way the new National
plan will work too.

From:John S.
sexyexotiche@aol.comspamfree

>> How does that then differ from DOR?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> John S.
> e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net

Reply to this Message

Joseph - 05 Apr 2004 04:19 GMT

>which company is better verizon wireless, att wireless, or sprint pcs (2
>lines)
>
>which is the best deal and has the best coverage in the U.S.

Yes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply

Reply to this Message