> Thanks VERY much for the help John! I talked to AT&T about it and
> they offer those two old crappy phones, and I just do not want to go
> backwards with this move!
The Nokia 6340 is hardly "cutting edge" in features, but it's a decent
phone. For that matter so is the Siemens multi-band that AT&T offers.
> One question though....
>
> On that phone, it will allow me to use the GSM plan, right?
No. The GSM plans are priced lower because AT&T can control roaming
costs by limiting use to their GSM "partners". The TDMA D1R plans let
you roam anywhere- even places/carriers AT&T doesn't have cheap
roaming agreements with, so you pay extra for the privilege of
potentially running up ATTWS' costs.
> I mean,
> in this whole dealie of wanting the best of both worlds, I don't get
> charged the D1R $$$ (still) would I?
I think the technical name for what you're attempting is "having your
cake and eating it too."
GSM plans aren't cheaper because the technology is cheaper, it's
because of the reduced roaming "liability", just as in the all-TDMA
days, local plans were cheaper than regional which were cheaper than
national which were cheaper than One Rate.
In short, you won't get D1R coverage unless you pay D1R money!
How often do you travel off the GSM map? What I do is use GSM
primarily, but keep a prepaid TDMA/analog phone through CallPlus (they
resell AT&T prepaid, but with no-roaming anywhere. Essentially it's a
pre-paid version of D1R.) I set up my GSM phone to automatically
forward to my CallPlus when "unavailable", so if I drift out of GSM
coverage, my calls seamlessly forward to the TDMA, but if there IS
coverage, the cheaper phone takes the call!