 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / ATT Wireless / June 2007Charter of alt.cellular.attws
Charter of alt.cellular.attws This group is for those who currently receive wireless service from AT&T, and for those who wish to discuss issues regarding wireless service from AT&T. The group will allow for free discussion of issues, equipment, quality of service problems, pricing plans, etc related to wireless services from AT&T. This group will allow for AT&T's wireless users to help one another with technical, service, equipment, and other issues. This group is unmoderated. However it requested that the following types of posts not be posted to the group: -Copyrighted news stories, other than a brief description of the story and a URL link. -Equipment sales and auctions -Personal attacks, including insults and flames -Unsubstantiated claims regarding service issues and coverage -Charters from other newsgroups -Posts containing obscenities -Spam -Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T wirelessatt@gmail.com wrote in news:1180999836.044567.40890 @i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > Charter of alt.cellular.attws > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > -Spam > -Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T When was this charter created? If the answer is "today", you're as bad as Navas. <snip> > When was this charter created? If the answer is "today", you're as bad as > Navas. LOL, I love it. Anyone can post a charter to alt.cellular.attws that's equally as invalid as the one Navas spams. This isn't a valid charter, since it is being made up after the fact. An alt charter is created by the person creating the group. If you want to make up a valid charter, then you'll have to start a new group. >Charter of alt.cellular.attws > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >-Spam >-Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T  SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws? [Copied to alt.cellular.attws. Please post all alt.cellular.cingular non-spam posts to alt.cellular.attws as well. The Cingular name is going away, and alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding AT&T's Wireless Service.] > This isn't a valid charter, since it is being made up after the fact. > An alt charter is created by the person creating the group. If you want [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >-Spam > >-Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T > Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws? LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in alt.cellular.attws. Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even though I understand that he is a television personality. >> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws? > > LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in > alt.cellular.attws. Yes he is. He moonlights as the Verizon guy. (Can you hear me now) :) > Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even though > I understand that he is a television personality. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in >> alt.cellular.attws. He actually looks like a fatter and uglier version of William Shatner. > Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even though I > understand that he is a television personality. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in > > alt.cellular.attws. Now that is funny. Where can we see a picture of Navas? > He actually looks like a fatter and uglier version of William Shatner. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> > LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in >> > alt.cellular.attws. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.