 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / ATT Wireless / February 2008What will Navas DO?
when Motorola exits the cell phone market? http://tinyurl.com/3da8ds John Navas, "modem expert", attaches himself and his reputation* to yet another shining star <snort>. I'll laugh my a.s off. And we won't see the Motorola charger FAQ and other similar crap anymore. * hey, just because it's a reputation doesn't mean it's good... > when Motorola exits the cell phone market? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > And we won't see the Motorola charger FAQ and other similar crap anymore. Unlikely. Everyone thought once the migration to alt.cellular.attws from alt.cellular.cingular took place that his posts of the alt.cellular.cingular charter would be history, but he simply moved on to annoy everyone in alt.cellular.attws, even though it has not relevance in that group. Even if Motorola exited the handset business, there would still be Motorola handsets in use for many years, so the charger "FAQ" would continue (even though the information in the FAQ is actually incorrect). Actually, Motorola probably _could_ sell their handset business to a Chinese supplier, just as IBM sold their PC business to Legend (Lenovo). A low cost manufacturer, without all the overhead, and able to survive on thin margins, could do well with it. That analyst stated the obvious regarding Motorola's problems largely being caused by the software in their handsets. The radio section of their handsets has always been excellent, but their user interface has always lagged Nokia. >That analyst stated the obvious regarding Motorola's problems largely >being caused by the software in their handsets. The radio section of >their handsets has always been excellent, BUT THEIR USER INTERFACE HAS >ALWAYS LAGGED NOKIA. (emphasis mine) If that isn't the understatement of the century, I don't know what is. >> That analyst stated the obvious regarding Motorola's problems largely >> being caused by the software in their handsets. The radio section of [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > If that isn't the understatement of the century, I don't know what is. There was one that beat that out. It was a post by someone trying to get Motorola Phone Tools to work: "...for what it is worth, this is a pretty bad piece of software that needs to be completely over-hauled..." Of course maybe MPT falls under the same umbrella when the analyst said that "software" was the problem. It needs to be thrown out! It is one of the worst pieces of software that I have ever seen. >>> That analyst stated the obvious regarding Motorola's problems largely >>> being caused by the software in their handsets. The radio section of [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Of course maybe MPT falls under the same umbrella when the analyst said > that "software" was the problem. > It needs to be thrown out! It is one of the worst pieces of software that I > have ever seen. LOL, well one person in the world thinks it's great. This is also the only person in the U.S. ever to have experienced the extended GSM network in the U.S., which has not been deployed in the U.S.. Go figure. >>> That analyst stated the obvious regarding Motorola's problems largely >>> being caused by the software in their handsets. The radio section of [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >"...for what it is worth, this is a pretty bad piece of software that >needs to be completely over-hauled..." Worse than that -- it is PAYWARE; you have to pay to use that crap. It is near impossible to sync with bluetooth to your PC. The FREE Nokia PC Suite and FREE Blackberry Desktop+Device Manager work superbly. I predict that Navas will attempt to become the leader and moderator of the attws group and will post his lame charter in the attws group. Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield... He gets no respect. > I predict that Navas will attempt to become the leader and moderator of the > attws group and will post his lame charter in the attws group. The group is unmoderated, and no one has been able to find the original charter, if indeed there ever was one. No one can change it to a moderated group, and none of the various charters that individuals have posted have any relevance. Navas has posted the Cingular charger many times, and others have posted other charters, but all of them are bogus. > Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield... He gets no respect. Navas could rehabilitate himself on Usenet if he truly was interested in doing so. >Navas could rehabilitate himself on Usenet if he truly was interested in >doing so. Change his nick and not act like an a.s? >> Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield... He gets no respect. > >Navas could rehabilitate himself on Usenet if he truly was interested in >doing so. Pot ... kettle ... :)  SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> In alt.cellular.attws John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield... He gets no respect. >> >>Navas could rehabilitate himself on Usenet if he truly was interested in >>doing so. > > Pot ... kettle ... :) Then quit posting your stinkin' Cingular charter in the attws group and you won't be labeled as a Pot or a Kettle. Either way ... if you keep doing it, you are black ... as pitch. You have been asked nicely to stop, you have been asked sarcastically to stop. If there was an enforcable charter, we could probbably get your provider to make you stop, but this is an alt group which pretty much anything goes. We can't stop you from being an a.shole and ignoring the wishes of contributors here and apparently, you can't seem to help yourself. I am not sure what it is that drives you to continue doing what is unwanted and unneccessary. What will you do if the cingular group drops dead and users start issuing delete commands ... providers might just drop it and then youw will be posting your charter in the wrong group for a group that won't even exist! SignatureThomas T. Veldhouse Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger >In alt.cellular.attws John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >will be posting your charter in the wrong group for a group that won't even >exist! Into the twit filter you go. SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> In alt.cellular.attws John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote: >>In alt.cellular.attws John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Into the twit filter you go. God you are so immutable. I can't possibly believe that a Wife [or whatever] would be able to take it ... you must live alone. SignatureThomas T. Veldhouse Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger > In alt.cellular.attws John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > whatever] > would be able to take it ... you must live alone. He is lying. He said he put a lot of us in his twit filter, only to reply when the so-called people talk about him. His Wife ? Muhahahaha... I do like the or (whatever part) :) >> God you are so immutable. I can't possibly believe that a Wife [or >> whatever] [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > His Wife ? Muhahahaha... I do like the or (whatever part) :) Well, he is from San Francisco, which increases his odds of "whatever". SignatureThomas T. Veldhouse Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.