Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / ATT Wireless / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is the Microsoft Office suite 'Docs to Go' coming to IPhone in June?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
4phun - 11 Mar 2008 03:22 GMT
from the Office Mobility Blog...
Microsoft Office mobility on the world's most popular smartphones

Earlier today CEO of DataViz, Inc., Dick Fontana, appeared on Fox
Business Network to share his thoughts about the recently announced
iPhone software development kit (SDK) and developing applications
(such as the popular Microsoft Office suite, Documents To Go) for this
platform.

With many other mobile device platforms, such as Palm and Windows
Mobile, a software company like DataViz is free to develop at will as
the software can be marketed through a variety of channels. Based on
yesterday's announcement from Apple, it seems things may be a bit
different for the iPhone:

"The fact that there's one path bringing software to the device means
that we have to go to the keepers of that path..."
While some may consider this a negative, DataViz has a long
relationship with Apple which gives Dick reason to be optimistic about
the opportunities for DataViz with the iPhone:

"We were one of the first developers for the Macintosh in 1984 and
they [Apple] have always proven to be good business partners... We
have every reason to believe that the path will be open for us."
You can see all of Dick's comments at the DataViz Channel on YouTube.

We are currently investigating the opportunity to develop Documents To
Go, RoadSync, Passwords Plus and any of our other software titles for
the iPhone and would appreciate your feedback.
http://www.dataviz.com/eforms/feedback/feedback_form.html
John B. Coarsey, PE - 11 Mar 2008 15:28 GMT
> from the Office Mobility Blog...
> Microsoft Office mobility on the world's most popular smartphones
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> the iPhone and would appreciate your feedback.
> http://www.dataviz.com/eforms/feedback/feedback_form.html

I wasn't aware that Docs2Go was a Microsoft product as your subject line
indicates. Care to elaborate?
Anybody - 11 Mar 2008 20:42 GMT
> > from the Office Mobility Blog...
> > Microsoft Office mobility on the world's most popular smartphones
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> I wasn't aware that Docs2Go was a Microsoft product as your subject line
> indicates. Care to elaborate?

Why do some people have to insist on being so thick or pedantic?!?  :-\

Documents to Go is obviously a Dataviz product to give you the ability
to use your Microsoft Office documents on small portable devices.
Kurt - 12 Mar 2008 01:42 GMT
> > > from the Office Mobility Blog...
> > > Microsoft Office mobility on the world's most popular smartphones
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Documents to Go is obviously a Dataviz product to give you the ability
> to use your Microsoft Office documents on small portable devices.

I liked it on my Treo. Looking forward to the iPhone version.

Signature

To reply by email, remove the word "space"

Todd Allcock - 12 Mar 2008 16:01 GMT
>> Documents to Go is obviously a Dataviz product to give you the ability
>> to use your Microsoft Office documents on small portable devices.
>
> I liked it on my Treo. Looking forward to the iPhone version.

I'm surprised you ever used it enough to form an opinion, given how
"difficult" you keep telling us all non-iPhones are to use, and that all
third-party apps hosed your Treo!  ;)
Kurt - 13 Mar 2008 04:24 GMT
> >> Documents to Go is obviously a Dataviz product to give you the ability
> >> to use your Microsoft Office documents on small portable devices.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "difficult" you keep telling us all non-iPhones are to use, and that all
> third-party apps hosed your Treo!  ;)

Stop being such a baby. Loved my Treo until something better came along.
iPhone runs circles around it. Yes, was tired of the third party apps
crashing the unit, but had you forgotten that DocsToGo came with unit?

Signature

To reply by email, remove the word "space"

Todd Allcock - 13 Mar 2008 07:43 GMT
> > I'm surprised you ever used it enough to form an opinion, given how
> > "difficult" you keep telling us all non-iPhones are to use, and that
> >all third-party apps hosed your Treo!  ;)
>
> Stop being such a baby.

Geez, relax a bit, Kurt- just poking a little fun, and kind of making the
point that we all somehow muddled through with these "user-hostile" devices
in the months B.I.

> Loved my Treo until something better came along.
> iPhone runs circles around it. Yes, was tired of the third party apps
> crashing the unit, but had you forgotten that DocsToGo came with unit?

No, in fact, I hadn't, but it's still a 3rd-party app regardless of whether
or not Palm threw it in.
Kurt - 13 Mar 2008 16:15 GMT
> > > I'm surprised you ever used it enough to form an opinion, given how
> > > "difficult" you keep telling us all non-iPhones are to use, and that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> point that we all somehow muddled through with these "user-hostile" devices
> in the months B.I.

Yes, it just seems like objectivity has been tossed out the window
lately.

> > Loved my Treo until something better came along.
> > iPhone runs circles around it. Yes, was tired of the third party apps
> > crashing the unit, but had you forgotten that DocsToGo came with unit?
>
> No, in fact, I hadn't, but it's still a 3rd-party app regardless of whether
> or not Palm threw it in.

Given that only a couple 3rd party apps came with it, I figure it had
been thoroughly tested for compatibility.

Believe me, I'm just apprehensive about third party apps that might be
available to the iPhone, but Apple seems committed to make sure we don't
have the conflicts that we see in other phones.

Signature

To reply by email, remove the word "space"

Todd Allcock - 13 Mar 2008 17:44 GMT
> Yes, it just seems like objectivity has been tossed out the window
> lately.

Frankly, it seems much better now that Oxford's settled into a new quieter
identity...

> > No, in fact, I hadn't, but it's still a 3rd-party app regardless of
> > whether or not Palm threw it in.
>
> Given that only a couple 3rd party apps came with it, I figure it had
> been thoroughly tested for compatibility.

I'm a WinMo guy rathr than a Palm guy, so I've learned that that's no
guarantee!  ;-)


> Believe me, I'm just apprehensive about third party apps that might be
> available to the iPhone, but Apple seems committed to make sure we don't
> have the conflicts that we see in other phones.

That's why I don't have a problem with Apple's level of control.  Both open
and closed platforms have their advantages, and, to their credit, Apple
seems to be trying to strike a reasonable balance between them.
Kurt - 14 Mar 2008 01:04 GMT
> > Yes, it just seems like objectivity has been tossed out the window
> > lately.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> and closed platforms have their advantages, and, to their credit, Apple
> seems to be trying to strike a reasonable balance between them.  

Opera Mini was a disaster for Treo until they took a few versions to get
the bugs out. Never want to ever see this again. I learned years ago
that I never want to be a beta tester for anyone, worse, one that I had
to pay for the privilege. Probably why I've stuck with Macs ;-).

Signature

To reply by email, remove the word "space"

Simon Slavin - 13 Mar 2008 23:04 GMT
On 10/03/2008, 4phun wrote in message <1cf6bb68-0388-46db-bff4-
8ab8cdd1a0dd@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>:

> [quote]

Just a quick heads-up that this post was cross-posted between

alt.cellular.attws
alt.cellular.cingular
misc.phone.mobile.iphone
alt.cellular.verizon

If you reply, please make sure your post is on-topic for all the groups
you post it to.  Thanks for your help.

Simon.
Signature

http://www.hearsay.demon.co.uk

Larry - 14 Mar 2008 01:59 GMT
> misc.phone.mobile.iphone
> alt.cellular.verizon
>
> If you reply, please make sure your post is on-topic for all the groups
> you post it to.  Thanks for your help.

NO posts to these two groups can be "on topic" because iPhone doesn't run
on Verizon, a CDMA carrier.
4phun - 14 Mar 2008 03:00 GMT
> > misc.phone.mobile.iphone
> > alt.cellular.verizon
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> NO posts to these two groups can be "on topic" because iPhone doesn't run
> on Verizon, a CDMA carrier.  

Actually I checked Radio Shack today and the manager said he gets many
Verizon customers everyday coming in who are inquiring about getting
an iPhone. Any information about this wildly popular device helps all
exisitng Verizon customers figure out how to obtain one. One detail
all should know is that they can't currently get one at Radio Shack.

He was knowledgeable about issues of prepay simms in the iPhone and
dropping iPhone simms in other phones.

Another manager for a large cell store did mention he could show his
customer how to put an iPhone on one of his other carriers.
George - 14 Mar 2008 12:57 GMT
>>> misc.phone.mobile.iphone
>>> alt.cellular.verizon
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Another manager for a large cell store did mention he could show his
> customer how to put an iPhone on one of his other carriers.

Don't think so. You just post fanboi stuff. How would that "help" people
"figure out" how to buy an iphone?
4phun - 14 Mar 2008 14:09 GMT
> >>> misc.phone.mobile.iphone
> >>> alt.cellular.verizon
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Don't think so. You just post fanboi stuff. How would that "help" people
> "figure out" how to buy an iphone?

This will help
http://revver.com/video/339339/waveees-words-of-wisdom-cell-phone-model-purchase
-plan/

4phun - 14 Mar 2008 16:42 GMT
> >>> misc.phone.mobile.iphone
> >>> alt.cellular.verizon
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwlsfNZsDKc&feature=related
Larry - 14 Mar 2008 21:28 GMT
4phun <vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote in news:aa8d15fc-c4d6-428b-91cb-
d2cc3d8cf533@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com:

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwlsfNZsDKc&feature=related

No, this one.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxZQi-XJwlc
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.