Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / ATT Wireless / June 2008
Why iPhone Wannabes Don't Cut It
|
|
Thread rating:  |
4phun - 19 Jun 2008 09:43 GMT BUSINESSWEEK Tech & You June 18, 2008, 10:19PM EST Why iPhone Wannabes Don't Cut It Handset giants are playing catch-up to Apple's design, but their software still lags badly by Stephen H. Wildstrom
Apple's influence on high-tech markets has long exceeded the company's relatively small market share, and nowhere is that more obvious than in the wireless phone market. Barely a year after it introduced the original iPhone, Apple (AAPL) has redefined the wireless handset.
SNIP http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_26/b4090000134565.htm
If you want to read the whole Newsweek article go to their website or buy the Magazine.
But look at the bottom line about that Sprint phone which is going to be a $100 a month...
BUSINESSWEEK
"Such efforts largely miss the point. Certainly, the beautiful hardware design adds tremendously to the emotional appeal of Apple products. But it's the software that makes the iPhone, the Mac, and the iPod stand out from the pack of wannabes.
Problems Magnified Consider how you explore the Net on an iPhone compared with on the Instinct ($130 after rebate with a two-year contract). The iPhone's Mobile Safari browser is in a class by itself: It is the only handheld browser I have used that makes it pleasant to view Web pages designed for big computer displays. The Instinct browser benefits from a big screen, but it is otherwise typical of the lame software found on other non-Apple handhelds. It offers a choice of displaying a page at magnifications labeled 1/2x, 1x, or 2x, a dramatically inferior option compared with the iPhone's ability to smoothly enlarge and shrink the page with a gesture. As a result, full-size Web pages that the iPhone handles easily are very difficult to read or navigate around on the Instinct.
The problems go deeper. Sprint—and just about everyone else— lacks..."
SNIP
BUSINESSWEEK
Gut Reaction: The Instinct's Good, But… The Instinct shows that Samsung and Sprint have learned a lot, too. It's a handsome product—maybe Samsung's best ever. Its no-button face, with a display just a bit smaller than the iPhone's, makes it look like the Apple handset's brother, and it even comes packed in an iPhone-like box.
Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply Everything plan, which includes unlimited voice and high-speed data plus unlimited streaming music and video, navigation service, and more. For some users, this may be a better deal than AT&T's (T) cheapest unlimited 3G iPhone data plan at $70 a month plus à la carte iTunes music and videos.
Yet despite its strong multimedia capabilities, the Instinct offers little more than the typical cell phone, and nothing near the iPhone's computerlike capabilities. Yes, good hardware design is critical. But in the end, it's the software that really makes the difference.
Wildstrom is Technology & You columnist for BusinessWeek.
You can contact him at techandyou@businessweek.com .
The Bob - 19 Jun 2008 21:39 GMT > Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply Everything > plan, And this single statement invalidates the accuracy of the entire article. The phone is being offered with plans as cheap as $69.99/month. This is no secret and even mentioned on the webpage for the phone. Customers are not required to have the $99.99 plan.
If the facts in an article are inaccurate, why believe anything else contained in ti?
Ron - 19 Jun 2008 22:55 GMT >> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply Everything >> plan, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >If the facts in an article are inaccurate, why believe anything else >contained in ti? The review I read on the Sprint wannabe phone panned the Browser in no uncertain terms.
The Safari Browser that Apple uses can zoom to any position to make it trivially easy to navigate and read regular web pages. The Sprint phone only has 3 size settings. Large (showing way too little of any web page), Medium, some what better but still hard to use, and small, better yet,but now illegibly small text.
The Bob - 19 Jun 2008 22:59 GMT >>> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >>> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > The review I read on the Sprint wannabe phone panned the Browser in no > uncertain terms. That is the review in question. They couldn't even get the basic facts right. Why would anyone believe their opinion?
Ron - 20 Jun 2008 00:27 GMT >>>> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >>>> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >That is the review in question. They couldn't even get the basic facts >right. Why would anyone believe their opinion? The review is spot-on in regard to Browsers.
And besides, any Sprint phone is stuck with the Sprint Network, and Sprint Customer Service.
The Bob - 20 Jun 2008 04:38 GMT >>>>> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >>>>> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > The review is spot-on in regard to Browsers. When did you get to play with the Samusing? You know, the phone that doesn't go on sale until tomorrow.
You don't know crap about it.
> And besides, any Sprint phone is stuck with the Sprint Network, and > Sprint Customer Service. Anthony Guzzi - 20 Jun 2008 02:13 GMT >> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply Everything >> plan, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > secret and even mentioned on the webpage for the phone. Customers are not > required to have the $99.99 plan. As cheap as?
The Bob - 20 Jun 2008 04:43 GMT >>> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >>> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > As cheap as? Do I need to go a little slower for you?
For $69.99, you get unlimited data, internet, GPS navigation and texting.
So yes, as cheap as.
Carl - 20 Jun 2008 02:56 GMT >> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > If the facts in an article are inaccurate, why believe anything else > contained in ti? No offense, but if a single factual error negates an entire article full of information, then why doesn't the fact that you spelled "it" as "ti" negate your entire post? The question really being, can you live with your own standard?
The Bob - 20 Jun 2008 04:48 GMT >>> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >>> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > as "ti" negate your entire post? The question really being, can you > live with your own standard? Because I am not a professional selling my opinion to the highest bidder while not doing proper research. If you feel the need to base your opinion on a simple spelling mistake, go for it.
And if this is was the first spelling mistake you've seen, you obviously never read anything on cnn.com.
Carl - 26 Jun 2008 13:47 GMT >>>> Sprint offers the Instinct only with its $99-a-month Simply >>>> Everything plan, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > And if this is was the first spelling mistake you've seen, you > obviously never read anything on cnn.com. Your first paragraph implies that you got my point, though you're adamant about defending yours.
Your second paragraph, however, implies that you've missed my point, or, that you feel the need to defend yours by going on some sort of offensive. In the vernacular, we call that "being defensive".
Even the most "professional" of writers make typos or make factual errors. If you follow this site along to its conclusion, for example, it leads you to believe The Instinct comes only with a $99 Plan. It's only when you dig further, and know what you're looking for, that you can find the $69 option. http://www.instinctthephone.com/
The Bob - 27 Jun 2008 00:27 GMT >>>> 4phun <vic.healey@gmail.com> amazed us all with the following in >>>> news:e26b015b-b57f-4d4e-887f-d560584f5c03@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.c [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Your first paragraph implies that you got my point, though you're > adamant about defending yours. Actually, I don't think you had a point, other than to pull the Spelling Police bit ewhen you have no other way to respond.
> Your second paragraph, however, implies that you've missed my point, > or, that you feel the need to defend yours by going on some sort of > offensive. In the vernacular, we call that "being defensive". No- in the vernacular, we call it "responding to a child."
> Even the most "professional" of writers make typos or make factual > errors. If you follow this site along to its conclusion, for example, > it leads you to believe The Instinct comes only with a $99 Plan. It doesn't lead you to believe it- there is nothing subtle about. It states it as fact.
> It's > only when you dig further, and know what you're looking for, that you > can find the $69 option. http://www.instinctthephone.com/ Or read any of the press releases, or do any kind of basic investigation about it. You know- the things an amateur can do and a professional should do.
|
|
|