Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / ATT Wireless / July 2008
iTunes apps store is open for buisness
|
|
Thread rating:  |
iPhone News - 11 Jul 2008 03:33 GMT Update iTunes to 7.7 and check it out...
552 applications. Of those, 417 are paid apps, and 135 are free. Of those that are paid, the most common prices were $0.99 for 85 apps, $9.99 for 82 apps, and $4.99 for 62 apps. They've compiled a bar graph of the prices, which you can see after the break.
Larry - 11 Jul 2008 04:25 GMT iPhone News <invalid@nospam.net> wrote in news:invalid- CCC933.22334010072008@news.giganews.com:
> Update iTunes to 7.7 and check it out... > > 552 applications. Of those, 417 are paid apps, and 135 are free. Of > those that are paid, the most common prices were $0.99 for 85 apps, > $9.99 for 82 apps, and $4.99 for 62 apps. They've compiled a bar graph > of the prices, which you can see after the break. I'll see your 552 and raise you 552.....
POST THEIR NAMES and let's chat....(c;
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 04:48 GMT > > Update iTunes to 7.7 and check it out... > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > POST THEIR NAMES and let's chat....(c; anyone can see the entire list, just open up itunes, go to the itunes store, and they are in the first column, marked "App Store" (New).
enjoy...
Larry - 11 Jul 2008 04:48 GMT >> > Update iTunes to 7.7 and check it out... >> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > enjoy... I don't want to sign up for iTunes JUST to look at a list of apps available for the FruitFone. Why are they hiding it from the general public? It seems like FruitFone apps would be the biggest selling point of 3G, beyond the faster speeds in some areas.
Why are they hiding??
The Bob - 11 Jul 2008 05:24 GMT >>> > Update iTunes to 7.7 and check it out... >>> > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Why are they hiding?? Garbage applications.
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 05:32 GMT > > anyone can see the entire list, just open up itunes, go to the itunes > > store, and they are in the first column, marked "App Store" (New). [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Why are they hiding?? you don't have to sign up to use it, it's entirely free. you only need an account if you purchase something.
go here, uncheck the first 2 boxes, put in a bogus email address:
aa@bb.com
then click the button --> (Download iTunes Free)
easy as pie.
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 05:34 GMT > > anyone can see the entire list, just open up itunes, go to the itunes > > store, and they are in the first column, marked "App Store" (New). [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Why are they hiding?? you don't have to sign up to use it, it's entirely free. you only need an account if you purchase something.
go here:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
uncheck the first 2 boxes, put in a bogus email address:
aa@bb.com
then click the button --> (Download iTunes Free)
easy as pie.
Kevin Weaver - 11 Jul 2008 06:02 GMT 80 megs of crap for the install.
>> > anyone can see the entire list, just open up itunes, go to the itunes >> > store, and they are in the first column, marked "App Store" (New). [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > easy as pie. Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 06:13 GMT > 80 megs of crap for the install. but much of it is to bring windows up to speed compared to a Mac. Macs are so much more advanced in the graphics, audio and video department it's laughable, so windows needs QuickTime plug in all the gaps that Microsoft has no idea about.
download it and see, or just get a Mac and not deal with the flimsy windows platform.
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
Kevin Weaver - 11 Jul 2008 07:22 GMT Why would I download it ? No need for it. Plain and simple.
How's the 3G iPhone working with Flash ? ; } I forgot, It won't.
>> 80 megs of crap for the install. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/ Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 07:37 GMT > Why would I download it ? No need for it. Plain and simple. but you will at some point.
> How's the 3G iPhone working with Flash ? ; } > I forgot, It won't. flash is battery draining and is proprietary, so it's a dead end long term.
looks like apple is going the SproutCore route.
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/14/cocoa-for-windows-flash-killer-s proutcore/
also good reading is the register piece, decent info to help you learn why flash doesn't make sense on handheld devices.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/02/inside_sproutcore/
Kevin Weaver - 11 Jul 2008 14:38 GMT And so is 3G,GPS and other apps. If it had a user replaceable battery those apps would not be a problem for the battery. You would do just like any other cell phone user does. Swap it out. Apple being the money sluts they are prevent that. Yes you can if you have the tools. But not in the field use.
How long has iTunes been out ? Never Installed it as of yet and never will.
>> Why would I download it ? No need for it. Plain and simple. > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/02/inside_sproutcore/ Larry - 11 Jul 2008 15:16 GMT > And so is 3G,GPS and other apps. If it had a user replaceable battery > those apps would not be a problem for the battery. You would do just > like any other cell phone user does. Swap it out. Apple being the > money sluts they are prevent that. Yes you can if you have the tools. > But not in the field use. ifixit.com reports the NEW battery is SMALLER than the old battery! The old battery was 1.4AH and the new battery is 1.1AH....a significant decline.
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 17:50 GMT > ifixit.com reports the NEW battery is SMALLER than the old battery! The > old battery was 1.4AH and the new battery is 1.1AH....a significant > decline. which means the 2.0 components are less battery draining. apple simply starts with a "base line" for battery usage. then uses the battery that matches that goal. so it's good the battery is smaller because that means the electronics are better this year, than last.
Todd Allcock - 11 Jul 2008 18:04 GMT >> ifixit.com reports the NEW battery is SMALLER than the old battery! The >> old battery was 1.4AH and the new battery is 1.1AH....a significant [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > matches that goal. so it's good the battery is smaller because that > means the electronics are better this year, than last. That's good logic... ...and my coffee beans must be 33% tastier this year, since they come in a 12oz bag instead of 1lb. bag like before...
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 19:34 GMT > > which means the 2.0 components are less battery draining. apple simply > > starts with a "base line" for battery usage. then uses the battery that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > That's good logic... ...and my coffee beans must be 33% tastier this year, > since they come in a 12oz bag instead of 1lb. bag like before... since when do beans become twice as tasty, half the price every 18 months?
your mixed metaphor doesn't hold up.
Todd Allcock - 11 Jul 2008 22:06 GMT > > > which means the 2.0 components are less battery draining. apple simply > > > starts with a "base line" for battery usage. then uses the battery that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > since when do beans become twice as tasty, half the price every 18 > months? What's "half the price?" Apples gives up on their revenue sharing ideas, allowing AT&T to subsidize it the same $250-300 they subsidize every other high-end phone and this is supposed to be a massive price cut?
iPhone I buyer should be steaming mad that Apple "stole" the two-year contract subsidy any other phone would've entitled them to, in the form of a long-term revenue-sharing commission!
But, all is back to normal now- in just one short year, after Apple was going to "change the wireless business forever," the "evil cellular companies" are back in the driver's seat, Apple's commission concept is dead, at-home activation is but a memory, and Apple will soon get back in line with Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, etc. building devices to carrier specifications.
Give it another year, and "iTunes activation" will likely be history altogether, after AT&T gets tired of having a list of special considerations and procedures for one company's products.
> your mixed metaphor doesn't hold up. It was supposed to sound as ridiculous as your battery diatribe.
Obviously, many design desions are made for many reasons, but Apple wouldn't shrink the batery because it lasts as long in the new model as the old one did in the old- besides, as you've linked, Walt Mossberg already told us battery life is less in the new model.
Obviously, form factor was the consideration- the new phone was designed to be roughly the same size as the old, and I suspect the new battery was all they could fit in. The poor engineers apparently didn't even have enough room left to squeeze in voice dialing! ;-)
Larry - 12 Jul 2008 02:50 GMT >> ifixit.com reports the NEW battery is SMALLER than the old battery! >> The old battery was 1.4AH and the new battery is 1.1AH....a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > that matches that goal. so it's good the battery is smaller because > that means the electronics are better this year, than last. I suppose by now, hours later, you've read the many reports of much reduced battery runtimes from realtime testing.....using the same battery tests used on the first model.
The old phone ran much longer than this puppy....so I'll ignore the other digs below this thread.
Oxford - 12 Jul 2008 03:39 GMT > > which means the 2.0 components are less battery draining. apple simply > > starts with a "base line" for battery usage. then uses the battery [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > The old phone ran much longer than this puppy....so I'll ignore the other > digs below this thread. turn off 3G and it will be exactly the same... what SJ said about the poor performance of 3G is true, so it's better to go with pure WiFI and do an end run around the old monopoly of cell phone companies... they are dead anyway, so let's all grow up and kill them faster...
bad battery life is a CONDITION of a non-competitive market...
apple is simply waiting for them to die off, thus WiFi / WiMax is the answer "long term"... and Apple is just positioning themselves for the "great fall" of AT&T and Verizon, etc...
learn how the computer industry works, it's FAR more efficient than the cell industry. we all laugh at how poorly cell companies are run each and every minute...
nospam - 13 Jul 2008 08:11 GMT > ifixit.com reports the NEW battery is SMALLER than the old battery! The > old battery was 1.4AH and the new battery is 1.1AH....a significant > decline. and the power consumption of the device has declined even further, so it's a net win. only with 3g is run time impacted; if both devices are in 2g mode, the new one lasts longer.
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 17:47 GMT > How long has iTunes been out ? Never Installed it as of yet and never will. you're really missing out.
it's not-unlike saying, "I'll never install a Web Browser, never have installed one, and never will".
iTunes is GREAT, probably the most important app on the planet of the last 5 years.
so sad you aren't closing your eyes to such a wonderful new world.
Larry - 11 Jul 2008 15:15 GMT "Kevin Weaver" <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:x_Cdk.12407 $89.3582@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com:
> How's the 3G iPhone working with Flash ? ; } > I forgot, It won't. ....or Windoze media or Real media or DivX or Flac or a bunch of other codecs.....(c;
anon - 11 Jul 2008 12:57 GMT > I don't want to sign up for iTunes JUST to look at a list of apps available > for the FruitFone. Why are they hiding it from the general public? LOL! you do not have a clue. "sign up"? you don't sing up for anything you idiot.
It should be funny to read the rambles of you and the other jealous Nokia fanboys as iPhone 2.0 raves come in.
4phun - 11 Jul 2008 18:45 GMT > > > Update iTunes to 7.7 and check it out... > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > enjoy... I think it is easier to do it straight from the new iPhone. They use the same interface as iTunes has in the ITunes store on the phone except it is dedicated to iphone applications.
Apple is sorry because they included some crap for the unwary that I would not allowed but hopefully that will quickly shake out.
Oxford - 11 Jul 2008 19:32 GMT > > anyone can see the entire list, just open up itunes, go to the itunes > > store, and they are in the first column, marked "App Store" (New). [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the same interface as iTunes has in the ITunes store on the phone > except it is dedicated to iphone applications. i thought that too, but went to the iTunes store for something else and the larger screen and the ability to batch download, then sync makes it quicker, much quicker.
> Apple is sorry because they included some crap for the unwary that I > would not allowed but hopefully that will quickly shake out. yeah, there are some weak apps in there, but the reviewing system helps figure that out... all the Tip calculators is absurd :)
|
|
|