> WCDMA + GSM=g3... u wouldnt want cdma (except for coverage)
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> > How hard can it be?
> One thought that the best of both worlds as far
> as coverage might be a selling point, and considering
> that all the base station hardware is there already.
> Some Telcos are a bit slow to realise that poofy video
> phones and data crap is still such a small market segment.
> Voice calls and coverage are what consumers want most.
Voice calls and SMS, yes. Coverage, nope, not most consumers
now that the coverage is perfectly adequate for most now. There
arent all that many that want or need the purported extra coverage
that a handset that can do GSM and CDMA could provide. There
are a few, but its a surprisingly small market now in this country.
Mainly those who spend quite a bit of time where CDMA coverage
is better than GSM and in the capital citys where in building
CDMA coverage isnt as good as with GSM.
> One only needs to look at "3" to see what a mistake it is to
> leap ahead with technology when consumers don't want it!
Sure, but thats not really relevant to the question of whether
there is much of a market for a dual GSM/CDMA handset now.
> > WCDMA + GSM=g3... u wouldnt want cdma (except for coverage)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >
> > > How hard can it be?