 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / April 2004Nokia 3105
Seems Orange is the first to launch the new Nokia 3105 CDMA phone. The ad appeared in todays Sunday Telegraph page 35 Bax > Seems Orange is the first to launch the new Nokia 3105 CDMA phone. The ad > appeared in todays Sunday Telegraph page 35 > > Bax Who else did u expect to launch it really ? >Who else did u expect to launch it really ? Telstra CDMA perhaps? > >Who else did u expect to launch it really ? > > Telstra CDMA perhaps? Apparently overdue for release by Telstra; still in testing. >Apparently overdue for release by Telstra; still in testing. Telstra is still testing? Telstra would not have allowed Orange to release it (the phone) if it wasn't suitable for use on the Telstra CDMA network. Remember, Orange roams on to Telstra CDMA outside Orange licence areas. More like release of the phone has been slowed in the bureaucracy that is Telstra. >> Apparently overdue for release by Telstra; still in testing. > Telstra is still testing? > Telstra would not have allowed Orange to release it (the phone) > if it wasn't suitable for use on the Telstra CDMA network. More utterly mindless bovine sh.t. > Remember, Orange roams on to Telstra > CDMA outside Orange licence areas. > More like release of the phone has been > slowed in the bureaucracy that is Telstra. MUCH more like Hutchison didnt bother to even ask Telstra. bovine, I like that! | >> Apparently overdue for release by Telstra; still in testing. | [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] | | MUCH more like Hutchison didnt bother to even ask Telstra. >MUCH more like Hutchison didnt bother to even ask Telstra. Telstra would have pulled the the plug on the roaming agreement in a flash if what you're suggesting is true. > >MUCH more like Hutchison didnt bother to even ask Telstra. > > Telstra would have pulled the the plug on the roaming agreement in a > flash if what you're suggesting is true. Dunno about that Robert - there's any number of dodgy overseas operations that Telstra will allow to roam in Oz, and Telstra wouldn't vet all the handsets *they* sell. Not even the handsets the tourists bring to Australia. I'd even suspect the number of international roamers on Telstra GSM would outweigh the number of Orange roamers on Telstra CDMA! >I'd even suspect the number of international roamers on Telstra GSM would >outweigh the number of Orange roamers on Telstra CDMA! Would be very difficult for Telstra to take action against an individual that just roams here as opposed to a company breaching a contractual agreement here in Australia. Remember, Telstra tries to kill the competition. They don't try and kill people from using its network. > Would be very difficult for Telstra to take action against an > individual that just roams here as opposed to a company breaching a > contractual agreement here in Australia. > > Remember, Telstra tries to kill the competition. They don't try and > kill people from using its network. Fair enough - you're right that it would be pretty cumbersome to police international roamers. But I think the point of Telstra's lengthy testing is to pre-empt bugs that might cause disruption to *their* customers. If an Orange customer called 125111 saying they were having trouble roaming to Telstra, I'm sure the CSR would tell them to shove it. >But I think the point of Telstra's lengthy testing is to pre-empt bugs that >might cause disruption to *their* customers. If an Orange customer called >125111 saying they were having trouble roaming to Telstra, I'm sure the CSR >would tell them to shove it. And rightly so, the customer belongs to Orange and is Orange's responsibility. >> But I think the point of Telstra's lengthy testing is to pre-empt bugs >> that might cause disruption to *their* customers. If an Orange >> customer called 125111 saying they were having trouble roaming >> to Telstra, I'm sure the CSR would tell them to shove it. > And rightly so, the customer belongs to > Orange and is Orange's responsibility. So Telstra wouldnt care if Orange chooses to flog a handset thats still got some warts in it on the Telstra network, fuckwit. If Orange started snivelling about problem with that handset when roaming, they'd just be told that they started flogging that handset too early and that the problems are their problem. >If Orange started snivelling about problem with that handset >when roaming, they'd just be told that they started flogging >that handset too early and that the problems are their problem. Telstra would be as polite as you are if that handset was causing problems on its network. >> If Orange started snivelling about problem with that handset >> when roaming, they'd just be told that they started flogging >> that handset too early and that the problems are their problem. > Telstra would be as polite as you are if that > handset was causing problems on its network. Corse it wouldnt, cretin. The most that might happen is that Orange customers cant roam without some warts. > > Would be very difficult for Telstra to take action against an > > individual that just roams here as opposed to a company breaching a [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Fair enough - you're right that it would be pretty cumbersome to police > international roamers. Not really, its dead easy > But I think the point of Telstra's lengthy testing is to pre-empt bugs that > might cause disruption to *their* customers. If an Orange customer called > 125111 saying they were having trouble roaming to Telstra, I'm sure the CSR > would tell them to shove it. Correct. thats oranges problem >> I'd even suspect the number of international roamers on Telstra GSM >> would outweigh the number of Orange roamers on Telstra CDMA! > Would be very difficult for Telstra to take action against > an individual that just roams here as opposed to a company > breaching a contractual agreement here in Australia. You dont even know whats in the contract, w.nker. > Remember, Telstra tries to kill the competition. How odd that they chose to sign 3 up for roaming at all. They did with one.hell too. > They don't try and kill people from using its network. Wota f.cking w.nker. > > >MUCH more like Hutchison didnt bother to even ask Telstra. > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I'd even suspect the number of international roamers on Telstra GSM would > outweigh the number of Orange roamers on Telstra CDMA! Probably >> MUCH more like Hutchison didnt bother to even ask Telstra. > Telstra would have pulled the the plug on the roaming > agreement in a flash if what you're suggesting is true. Complete and utter pig ignorant drivel. As always from the bovine fool. >>>Who else did u expect to launch it really ? >> >>Telstra CDMA perhaps? > > Apparently overdue for release by Telstra; still in testing. Geez, they're taking their time testing this phone model. Telecom NZ has been selling this phone for a few months already. - James > >Who else did u expect to launch it really ? > > Telstra CDMA perhaps? Perhaps but Orange is more interested in CDMA than telstra for obvious reasons >Seems Orange is the first to launch the new Nokia 3105 CDMA phone. The ad >appeared in todays Sunday Telegraph page 35 Been on their web site for a few weeks. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.