Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GSM Roaming USA - Nextel?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Phillips - 29 Aug 2004 07:49 GMT
On http://tinyurl.com/5uero Telstra claim they roam on Nextel in USA
(frequency not stated - "other Mhz"), but no mention of Nextel in
http://tinyurl.com/6m28u as a GSM operator.

Their rates look fairly reasonable;  anybody know more about this?

Signature

Behind every great computer lies... a mess of wires!

Jeremy Quirke - 29 Aug 2004 09:33 GMT
> On http://tinyurl.com/5uero Telstra claim they roam on Nextel in USA
> (frequency not stated - "other Mhz"), but no mention of Nextel in
> http://tinyurl.com/6m28u as a GSM operator.
>
> Their rates look fairly reasonable;  anybody know more about this?

Nextel isn't a GSM operator, they are iDen.

I suggest you just choose the network which has the best rates and has
coverage where you happen to be. T-Mobile is 1900-only, whereas AT&T and
Cingular are 850/1900 and it varies widely with the area you are in. So your
phone's supported bands will be important.
Mike - 29 Aug 2004 14:40 GMT
> On http://tinyurl.com/5uero Telstra claim they roam on Nextel in USA
> (frequency not stated - "other Mhz"), but no mention of Nextel in
> http://tinyurl.com/6m28u as a GSM operator.
>
> Their rates look fairly reasonable;  anybody know more about this?

This is obviously a new use of the word "reasonable" that I havn't
previously encounterted.
John Phillips - 29 Aug 2004 21:11 GMT
> This is obviously a new use of the word "reasonable" that I havn't
> previously encounterted.

err... well at least compared to AT&T and Cingular.

Signature

(a) Fast, (b) Reliable, (c) Inexpensive - Pick Two.

Jeremy Quirke - 30 Aug 2004 10:23 GMT
> > This is obviously a new use of the word "reasonable" that I havn't
> > previously encounterted.
>
> err... well at least compared to AT&T and Cingular.

Yes, but they have to beat the GSM operators otherwise there would be little
point to choosing them. I don't really know why they bother with a roaming
agreement in the first place.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.