On http://tinyurl.com/5uero Telstra claim they roam on Nextel in USA
(frequency not stated - "other Mhz"), but no mention of Nextel in
http://tinyurl.com/6m28u as a GSM operator.
Their rates look fairly reasonable; anybody know more about this?

Signature
Behind every great computer lies... a mess of wires!
Jeremy Quirke - 29 Aug 2004 09:33 GMT
> On http://tinyurl.com/5uero Telstra claim they roam on Nextel in USA
> (frequency not stated - "other Mhz"), but no mention of Nextel in
> http://tinyurl.com/6m28u as a GSM operator.
>
> Their rates look fairly reasonable; anybody know more about this?
Nextel isn't a GSM operator, they are iDen.
I suggest you just choose the network which has the best rates and has
coverage where you happen to be. T-Mobile is 1900-only, whereas AT&T and
Cingular are 850/1900 and it varies widely with the area you are in. So your
phone's supported bands will be important.
Mike - 29 Aug 2004 14:40 GMT
> On http://tinyurl.com/5uero Telstra claim they roam on Nextel in USA
> (frequency not stated - "other Mhz"), but no mention of Nextel in
> http://tinyurl.com/6m28u as a GSM operator.
>
> Their rates look fairly reasonable; anybody know more about this?
This is obviously a new use of the word "reasonable" that I havn't
previously encounterted.
John Phillips - 29 Aug 2004 21:11 GMT
> This is obviously a new use of the word "reasonable" that I havn't
> previously encounterted.
err... well at least compared to AT&T and Cingular.

Signature
(a) Fast, (b) Reliable, (c) Inexpensive - Pick Two.
Jeremy Quirke - 30 Aug 2004 10:23 GMT
> > This is obviously a new use of the word "reasonable" that I havn't
> > previously encounterted.
>
> err... well at least compared to AT&T and Cingular.
Yes, but they have to beat the GSM operators otherwise there would be little
point to choosing them. I don't really know why they bother with a roaming
agreement in the first place.