> Hence, the TIO is an appropriate course of action.
>>> Complain to ACCC/TIO if Woolies are arseholes.
>>
>> You need to learn what those places do...
>> Woolies are in this case an agent, selling telecommunications services on
>> behalf of Vodafone.
>
> Wrong, as always. They're JUST selling a starter kit, fool.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
> Absolutely NOTHING to do with the TIO at all.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
> And retail operations arent under any legal obligation
> to sell anything to anyone, just as long as they dont
> discriminate on the basis of race etc.
>
> As always, not a f.cking clue.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
>> Hence, the TIO is an appropriate course of action.
>
> As always, not a f.cking clue.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
>> Generally, telecommunications consumer issues
>
> Pity flogging a starter kit aint.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
>> are handled by the Federal body, rather than State/
>> Territory Fair Trading agencies, hence the ACCC is also appropriate for a
>> complaint in this instance.
>
> As always, not a f.cking clue.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
> Its at most JUST a basic retail transaction, which the
> state FT is responsible for, and retail operations arent
> under any legal obligation to sell anything to anyone, just
> as long as they dont discriminate on the basis of race etc.
Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
>>>> Complain to ACCC/TIO if Woolies are arseholes.
>>>
>>> You need to learn what those places do...
Rod Speed - 08 Dec 2004 09:42 GMT
>> thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote
>>> Woolies are in this case an agent, selling telecommunications services on
>>> behalf of Vodafone.
>> Wrong, as always. They're JUST selling a starter kit, fool.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>> Absolutely NOTHING to do with the TIO at all.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>> And retail operations arent under any legal obligation
>> to sell anything to anyone, just as long as they dont
>> discriminate on the basis of race etc.
>> As always, not a f.cking clue.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>>> Hence, the TIO is an appropriate course of action.
>> As always, not a f.cking clue.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>>> Generally, telecommunications consumer issues
>> Pity flogging a starter kit aint.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>>> are handled by the Federal body, rather than State/
>>> Territory Fair Trading agencies, hence the ACCC is also appropriate for a
>>> complaint in this instance.
>> As always, not a f.cking clue.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>> Its at most JUST a basic retail transaction, which the
>> state FT is responsible for, and retail operations arent
>> under any legal obligation to sell anything to anyone, just
>> as long as they dont discriminate on the basis of race etc.
> Pity the TIO and ACCC thought otherwise.
You're lying, as always.
>>>>> Complain to ACCC/TIO if Woolies are arseholes.
>>>>
>>>> You need to learn what those places do...