I have a brother-in-law who has an artificial heart in the sense that
he has some electronic apparatus where his heart used to be. Anyway I
had to visit my sister recently to discuss some family legal matters,
and I was told not to bring a mobile phone, as this would cause the
artificial heart to malfunction, according to medical opinion she
received. Anyway, I just switched the mobile off, and kept it out of
sight. I was told later that my sister did not have a mobile phone,
either kept in the car or anywhere else, and I wonder if that is really
necessary.
I sometimes have an am/fm radio receiver in my pocket in close
proximity to the mobile phone, and I often hear static in the ear plugs
resulting from the provider signal tuning into the mobile phone, so it
could be possible for a mobile phone signal to cause a complicated
electrical heart to malfunction. Once I happened to put the mobile in
the same pocket as the radio receiver, and there was ear-shattering
static (which sometimes happens anyway if you sit next to someone
receiving a call on a mobile, if you have radio earplugs on), so it is
necessary to keep the mobile separate from the radio, in order to
receive just mild static.
Anyway I would like to look into this matter further, in order to
determine whether mobile phones are in any real sense a threat to
people with artificial hearts. In the meantime I wonder if anyone
posting in this forum has any thoughts on the matter. I would have
thought that the new digital phones would possibly have a neutral
effect on other electronic apparatus, by comparasion with the old
analogue phones.
tdk-217 - 28 Apr 2005 06:37 GMT
You should speak to his cardiologist. New phones interfere with pacemakers
so they probably interfere with what you are talking about
> I have a brother-in-law who has an artificial heart in the sense that
> he has some electronic apparatus where his heart used to be. Anyway I
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> effect on other electronic apparatus, by comparasion with the old
> analogue phones.
Rod Speed - 28 Apr 2005 06:51 GMT
>I have a brother-in-law who has an artificial heart in the sense that
> he has some electronic apparatus where his heart used to be. Anyway I
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> effect on other electronic apparatus, by comparasion with the old
> analogue phones.
Bet she hasnt got a clue.
Hard to believe that he's at risk every time he goes out of the house, stupid.
virgmob007@netscape.net - 30 Apr 2005 01:18 GMT
> >I have a brother-in-law who has an artificial heart in the sense that
> > he has some electronic apparatus where his heart used to be. Anyway I
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Hard to believe that he's at risk every time he goes out of the house, stupid.
Yes, that's what I thought, which is why I am interested in what are
the real facts, as my sister should be able to use her own mobile if
possible. In your own inimical way you have got to the heart of the
matter.
roma - 30 Apr 2005 02:25 GMT
It may be just worse when he is too close next to a phone. I have no
clue on the matter. However a CDMA phone may be your answer as they
dont intefere with radio, monitor screens or some other electrical
equipment.
I dont actually know for sure about any details but it could be a
viable alternative.
Roma
RSSMobile

Signature
roma