 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / February 2006Reverse phone lookup mobile/landline
Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse lookup on a QLD landline or mobile number? They're numbers some thief made from my phone after he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else). Reported to the Police but I'm not that high a priority. Also tried to buy PhoneDisc myself but it seems they've been run out of business. Any help would be really appreciated, Cheers, Davo > Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse > lookup on a QLD landline or mobile number? Yes, my email works. > They're numbers some thief made from my phone after > he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else). > Reported to the Police but I'm not that high a priority. > Also tried to buy PhoneDisc myself but > it seems they've been run out of business. Yep, tho you can get the last CD using emule. Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses these days (Leopard?). > Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse lookup on a QLD landline > or mobile number? They're numbers some thief made from my phone after [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Cheers, > Davo > Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? > > Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses > these days (Leopard?). Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago? Surely you have heard of Flexcab? >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago? >Surely you have heard of Flexcab? Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, over-budget, bloated piece of accounting crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact and efficient? budgie <me@privacy.net> said >>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC. > over-budget, Nope. > bloated Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and calculates. > piece of > accounting crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact > and efficient? You've got no idea, have you?  SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) >budgie <me@privacy.net> said > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC. Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ...... >> over-budget, > >Nope. Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ...... >> bloated > >Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and >calculates. Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ...... >> piece of >> accounting crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact >> and efficient? > >You've got no idea, have you? Chortle! budgie <me@privacy.net> said >>budgie <me@privacy.net> said >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ...... Just double checked. Began trials in '93 - live in '94. Keep laughing, downie. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) >budgie <me@privacy.net> said > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > >Keep laughing, downie. It wasn't "running" in 96 - it was still limping. Look up what 'running" really means. From your apologist posting, you must have been involved in its creation ... budgie <me@privacy.net> said >>budgie <me@privacy.net> said >> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > It wasn't "running" in 96 Wrong, dickhead. > - it was still limping. You call 15,000+ users and calculating 30 million call costs a day 'limping'?? ROFL. > Look up what > 'running" really means. I already know what it means. Flexcab has been 'running' quite well for over a decade. > From your apologist posting, you must have been > involved in its creation ... Wrong again. Are you going to get anything right, or should I just ignore any further so-called 'contributions' you make to this thread? SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > > - it was still limping. > > You call 15,000+ users and calculating 30 million call costs a day > 'limping'?? ROFL. I thought UPS calculated call costs? > I already know what it means. Flexcab has been 'running' quite well for > over a decade. Yep > > From your apologist posting, you must have been > > involved in its creation ... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Are you going to get anything right, or should I just ignore any further > so-called 'contributions' you make to this thread? He's being a w.nker. Pity > >budgie <me@privacy.net> said > > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > It wasn't "running" in 96 - it was still limping. Look up what 'running" really > means. From your apologist posting, you must have been involved in its creation Budgie, lets get it out in the open. Have you ever used Flexcab? >> >budgie <me@privacy.net> said >> > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >Have you ever used Flexcab? Nope. A mate was a long-time victim of it until he left Tel$tra in 2001. > >> >budgie <me@privacy.net> said > >> > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Nope. A mate was a long-time victim of it until he left Tel$tra in 2001. Let me just say your attitude towards Flexcab is unfounded. >> >> >budgie <me@privacy.net> said >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > >Let me just say your attitude towards Flexcab is unfounded. Let's agree to disagree. Hving noted your posts elsewhere, Isuspect you weren't on it 5 days/week then. In that context I'd surely prefer the mate's version to yours. > > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Nope. I heard it was. > > bloated > > Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and > calculates. Definately not bloated at all. A very elegant mainframe system >> > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >I heard it was. So have others. >> > bloated >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Definately not bloated at all. >A very elegant mainframe system "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I heard it was. Probably over the initial estimates, but not over the official quoted amount. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Probably over the initial estimates, but not over the official quoted amount. And its no big deal anyway, as its 2005. Budgie is just stuck in the past >> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >And its no big deal anyway, as its 2005. >Budgie is just stuck in the past Typical Tel$tra apologist. Always trying to re-write history, or deny it. budgie <me@privacy.net> said >>> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Typical Tel$tra apologist. Always trying to re-write history, or deny it. Do you even understand how new system development is initiated, fuckwit? An example would go something like this: Someone decides "We need a new system to perform xxxx function- I reckon it will cost about $5 million" They get approval to go to tender. Tender process is undertaken and bids come in from various vendors at around $10 million. That someone then goes back to their superiors with pricing. If it's approved the work goes ahead. If not, it's knocked on the head. Although the final price could be double what was estimated, that does not mean it's over budget. It simply means that the initial estimates were optimistic. Estimates are not budgets. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) >budgie <me@privacy.net> said > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > >Do you even understand how new system development is initiated, fuckwit? yes, i do, fuckwit. >An example would go something like this: >Someone decides "We need a new system to perform xxxx function- I reckon it [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >mean it's over budget. It simply means that the initial estimates were >optimistic. Estimates are not budgets. And when the final price is $20M and the product is two years past its promised delivery date before it is signed off, what do YOU call it? Most people call that over time and over budget. Fuckwit! budgie <me@privacy.net> said >>budgie <me@privacy.net> said >> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > yes, i do, fuckwit. You are clearly a liar or delusional. >>An example would go something like this: >>Someone decides "We need a new system to perform xxxx function- I reckon [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Most people call that over time and over budget. Correct, it would be over time and over budget, but we were talking about Flexcab which was delivered on time and on budget. > Fuckwit! ROFL. Not too bright, are you. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) >budgie <me@privacy.net> said > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] >Correct, it would be over time and over budget, but we were talking about >Flexcab which was delivered on time and on budget. Now who's delusional? >> Fuckwit! > >ROFL. Not too bright, are you. > Correct, it would be over time and over budget, but we were talking about > Flexcab which was delivered on time and on budget. This is not the Phoenix project is it? acalcium <acalcium@aol.com> said >> Correct, it would be over time and over budget, but we were talking about >> Flexcab which was delivered on time and on budget. > > This is not the Phoenix project is it? Nope. Nothing to do with Phoenix. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? > >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, over-budget, bloated piece of accounting > crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact and efficient? So good that is has been in use for 10 years now, still going strong with no replacement plans? Overbudget 10 years ago, long paid for by now. >> >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? >> >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >So good that is has been in use for 10 years now, still going strong with no >replacement plans? I've got a car like that. Your point? >Overbudget 10 years ago, long paid for by now. Agree on both counts. > >> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses > >> these days (Leopard?). > > > > Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago? > Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early > 2000......... Yeah but its two generations ago. Service Plus came next and then whatever they use now. Siiam? Yep, SIIAM, ahhh, slow and unrelaible SIIAM, came in to full service in 2004 but still going down on average once every two weeks. not bad for a systemwe where told would never go down! Bring back S*P I say! Signaturecwaiggie > > >> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system > Telstra [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > 2004 but still going down on average once every two weeks. not bad for a > systemwe where told would never go down! Bring back S*P I say! S*P is still around, if you look hard enough. Its still used to process data b/w two intermediary systems. FYI how old is this post ?! No one ever guaranteed SIIAM wouldnt go down. The vendor has an SLA anyway, they pay $$$ when they dont meet the SLA SIIAM is OK, its only hours of it every day gets a litle much when it stuffs up. No big bitch about it other then that. I did lke the s*p days when we got to think a bit more Signaturecwaiggie > SIIAM is OK, its only hours of it every day gets a litle much when it > stuffs up. No big bitch about it other then that. I did lke the s*p > days when we got to think a bit more Telstra isn't in to allowing their staff to think. GUI interfaces all the way, even if you have no idea how it really works . . . just point and click and hope for the best. Cuts down on training dollars! > SIIAM is OK, its only hours of it every day gets a litle much when it > stuffs up. No big bitch about it other then that. I did lke the s*p > days when we got to think a bit more Telstra isn't in to allowing their staff to think. GUI interfaces all the way, even if you have no idea how it really works . . . just point and click and hope for the best. Cuts down on training dollars! True dat Signaturecwaiggie "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself? >> >> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses >> these days (Leopard?). > > Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago? Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early 2000......... SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early > 2000......... What platform was it on before? Bull? "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > What platform was it on before? Bull? Yep. Ported in 1999 (even though it was in mothballs) as the S*P team weren't fully trusted to get their system Y2K compliant. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Ported in 1999 (even though it was in mothballs) as the S*P team weren't > fully trusted to get their system Y2K compliant. Yeah I think RASS-P was an old Bull system too. "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Yeah I think RASS-P was an old Bull system too. Yep. DCRIS, CABS (I think), LEOPARD, FACS, RASS-P, RASS-M and HORIZON were the main ones. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > >> Yep. > >> Ported in 1999 (even though it was in mothballs) as the S*P team weren't [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > DCRIS, CABS (I think), LEOPARD, FACS, RASS-P, RASS-M and HORIZON were the > main ones. What did FACS and HORIZON do? Familar with the rest "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said >> >> Yep. >> >> Ported in 1999 (even though it was in mothballs) as the S*P team [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > What did FACS FACS was ported to IBM virtually unchanged and renamed to NPAMS - Used to be an acronym for Frame and Cable System. > and HORIZON do? PABX sales and maintenance before S*P. SignatureKwyj. (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email) > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > FACS was ported to IBM virtually unchanged and renamed to NPAMS - Used to be > an acronym for Frame and Cable System. Cheers NPAMS - love the esoteric screen names. Give me a JE30 anyday > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early > 2000......... Yeah but its two generations ago. Service Plus came next and then whatever they use now. Siiam? > Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse lookup on a QLD landline > or mobile number? They're numbers some thief made from my phone after > he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else). Reported to > the Police but I'm not that high a priority. Also tried to buy > PhoneDisc myself but it seems they've been run out of business. The police will handle this issue |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.