> Hi.. friend has a mobile for sale, it's a Telecom Walkabout 400.. does
> anyone know how much these are worth? Are they any good?
"Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
> Umm...$0? Wasn't that crappy idea for a network killed off MANY years ago?
>
> Possibly the only value it would hold would be to a museum?
I remember these... you could only use them in places where there was a
walkabout sign - how did they work? were they an AMPS based system, or
early GSM, or something else?
Graeme Willox - 26 Dec 2005 10:04 GMT
> "Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> walkabout sign - how did they work? were they an AMPS based system, or
> early GSM, or something else?
I don't know what technology they used. As I recall, though, they could
be used with a home base station, much the same as a cordless phone.
Once you left home, they had a different number. You had to manually
log on to a local base station when you wanted to make a call.
RdrrRdrrr - 26 Dec 2005 10:35 GMT
>"Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>walkabout sign - how did they work? were they an AMPS based system, or
>early GSM, or something else?
Technology call CT2 or Second Generation Cordless Telephone.
Michael - 26 Dec 2005 10:40 GMT
> "Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> walkabout sign - how did they work? were they an AMPS based system, or
> early GSM, or something else?
Think it was trialled in Brisbane
Horace Wachope . - 26 Dec 2005 11:12 GMT
> "Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> walkabout sign - how did they work? were they an AMPS based system, or
> early GSM, or something else?
Isn't that Talkabout, not Walkabout?
I think the Walkabouts were just standard AMPS handsets.
Michael - 27 Dec 2005 04:06 GMT
> > "Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Isn't that Talkabout, not Walkabout?
Yeah I think you are right
> I think the Walkabouts were just standard AMPS handsets.
Yup, but the OP was obviously talking about Talkabout.
Nola Jean McKenzie - 27 Dec 2005 08:34 GMT
> Yup, but the OP was obviously talking about Talkabout.
oops... I meant talkabout, trialled in Brisbane. I remember the ads for
it.
Jim Jones - 27 Dec 2005 09:27 GMT
>> > "Nick Adams" <buzz@off.com> wrote in message news:43af8988$0$9289
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Yup, but the OP was obviously talking about Talkabout.
No. actually I was talking about the Wallabout. Not sure if it is still
working, has been in storage.