> Not quite true roddles, especially in the area mentioned...
Baulkho should be ok but further up a little, Telstra is shitful in parts
whereas voda has a much stronger signal in the same spots and optus is ok as
well. All this in a hugely populated area too.
Makes a difference when you cant use the mobile at home due to having the
wrong provider for that particular spot....I know.
>> Not quite true roddles, especially in the area mentioned...
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>
>>> There's bugger all in it coverage wise.
Rod Speed - 12 Aug 2006 21:12 GMT
> Baulkho should be ok
What I said.
> but further up a little, Telstra is shitful in
> parts whereas voda has a much stronger signal in the same spots and
> optus is ok as well. All this in a hugely populated area too.
> Makes a difference when you cant use the mobile at home due to having
> the wrong provider for that particular spot....I know.
Not what was being discussed.
>>> Not quite true roddles, especially in the area mentioned...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>>
>>>> There's bugger all in it coverage wise.
akubencispam - 19 Aug 2006 03:54 GMT
Thats nonsence. I've been using Telstra & Voda both (2 phones) for a long
time now. Both are just as good as each other around Sydney (Baulkham Hills
ok). You will find Telstra better though when you go to rural areas....
> Baulkho should be ok but further up a little, Telstra is shitful in parts
> whereas voda has a much stronger signal in the same spots and optus is ok
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>>>
>>>> There's bugger all in it coverage wise.