Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wota pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rod Speed - 13 Aug 2006 00:34 GMT
http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
SmakDaddy - 13 Aug 2006 03:47 GMT
heh, before I even clicked the link the name 'Sol Trujillo' popped into my
mind

> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Chris McDonald - 13 Aug 2006 03:51 GMT
>heh, before I even clicked the link the name 'Sol Trujillo' popped into my
>mind

>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677

Before I even opened the article in my newsreader,
I thought "one line precis by Rod".  I was wrong, zero lines.

Signature

Chris,

moo cow - 13 Aug 2006 04:02 GMT
i wonder what will happen to telstra when the power companies start adding
phone and internet over power?

i hear its going well in tassie

> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Rod Speed - 13 Aug 2006 05:24 GMT
> i wonder what will happen to telstra when the power companies start adding phone and
> internet over power?

Nothing, you watch.

> i hear its going well in tassie

Like hell it is as far as ever being competitive with adsl is concerned.

THATS what matters.

>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Michael - 13 Aug 2006 08:08 GMT
> i wonder what will happen to telstra when the power companies start adding
> phone and internet over power?

Nothing will happen to Telstra, because its been done for years now

> i hear its going well in tassie

Nope
Whatcher? - 13 Aug 2006 22:39 GMT
Data has to come in and go out through someone. Telstra will still get
income. What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is that they
are going to do it and if they do, it will be interesting to have wireless
broadband, efficiently, everywhere in Oz near a town of any size. No need
for ADSL up a phone line. Whoever gets it first is going to get a massive
amount of users!!

>i wonder what will happen to telstra when the power companies start adding
>phone and internet over power?
>
> i hear its going well in tassie
>
>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Rod Speed - 13 Aug 2006 23:10 GMT
> Data has to come in and go out through someone.

Not necessarily telstra tho.

> Telstra will still get income.

Not necessarily.

> What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is that they are going to do it
> and if they do, it will be interesting to have wireless broadband, efficiently,
> everywhere in Oz near a town of any size.

Any shared bandwidth system has to be worse than a non shared one.

Those mindlessly rabbiting of about the alleged slowness
of adsl clearly hasnt used a wireless system.

> No need for ADSL up a phone line. Whoever gets it first is going to get a massive amount
> of users!!

Nope, there's a few fundamental reasons why most arent bothering.

>> i wonder what will happen to telstra when the power companies start
>> adding phone and internet over power?
>>
>> i hear its going well in tassie
>>
>>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Whatcher? - 15 Aug 2006 06:21 GMT
>> Data has to come in and go out through someone.
>
> Not necessarily telstra tho.

Errr Rod you are wrong on that one. Data definitely DOES have to come in and
go out through someone.

>> Telstra will still get income.
>
> Not necessarily.

Sure as eggs, they will get income.

>> What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is that they are
>> going to do it and if they do, it will be interesting to have wireless
>> broadband, efficiently, everywhere in Oz near a town of any size.
>
> Any shared bandwidth system has to be worse than a non shared one.

Depends on the reliability and speed at which you get it. In the case of
wireless broadband that actually is efficient and not the sh.t we have now,
it may also depend on your need to have internet anywhere.

> Those mindlessly rabbiting of about the alleged slowness
> of adsl clearly hasnt used a wireless system.

I havent used wireless broadband, definitely.

>> No need for ADSL up a phone line. Whoever gets it first is going to get a
>> massive amount of users!!
>
> Nope, there's a few fundamental reasons why most arent bothering.

One being that wi-max isnt around yet in Oz mainland (excluding Tas)?
Rod Speed - 15 Aug 2006 06:27 GMT
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>> Data has to come in and go out through someone.

>> Not necessarily telstra tho.

> Errr Rod you are wrong on that one.

I am never ever wrong.

> Data definitely DOES have to come in and go out through someone.

Never said it doesnt, stupid.

>>> Telstra will still get income.

>> Not necessarily.

> Sure as eggs, they will get income.

Not with data that doesnt go anywhere near telstra they wont.

>>> What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is that they
>>> are going to do it and if they do, it will be interesting to have wireless broadband,
>>> efficiently, everywhere in Oz near a town of any size.

>> Any shared bandwidth system has to be worse than a non shared one.

> Depends on the reliability and speed at which you get it.

Nope, depends on what bandwidth is available to be shared.

> In the case of wireless broadband that actually is efficient and not the sh.t we have
> now,

Mindless pig ignorant silly stuff.

> it may also depend on your need to have internet anywhere.

No may about it.

>> Those mindlessly rabbiting of about the alleged slowness
>> of adsl clearly hasnt used a wireless system.

> I havent used wireless broadband, definitely.

Your problem.

>>> No need for ADSL up a phone line. Whoever gets it first is going to get a massive
>>> amount of users!!

>> Nope, there's a few fundamental reasons why most arent bothering.

> One being that wi-max isnt around yet in Oz mainland (excluding Tas)?

There's a few fundamental reasons why most
arent bothering and that one isnt one of them.
Gary R. Schmidt - 13 Aug 2006 23:40 GMT
> Data has to come in and go out through someone. Telstra will still get
> income. What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is that they
> are going to do it and if they do, it will be interesting to have wireless
> broadband, efficiently, everywhere in Oz near a town of any size. No need
> for ADSL up a phone line. Whoever gets it first is going to get a massive
> amount of users!!

If, and it's a bloody big if, they do it at the right price.

Years ago, when FoxTel was starting out in Oz, I, and many, _many_
others told them that to get good penetration they needed a basic
subscription model with a "pick what other channels you want" mix, with
channels grouped in cost, and packaged as well, such as "all the sports
channels" for $xx, but allow for someone who wanted, say, the horse
racing and a premium movie channel and a comedy channel, at individual
prices.  Of course, the morons thought they would make more money by
forcing people to buy *big* packages to get all the channels they want,
which, of course, they didn't, so take-up of cable in Oz is minimal, as
are profits.

No doubt saner heads will prevail in the WiMAX roll out...  (But I, for
one, am not holding my breath)

    Cheers,
        Gary    B-)

Signature

______________________________________________________________________________
Armful of chairs: Something some people would not know
                  whether you were up them with or not
                                     - Barry Humphries

Jim P Sharma - 14 Aug 2006 00:42 GMT
>> Data has to come in and go out through someone. Telstra will still
>> get income. What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> channels they want, which, of course, they didn't, so take-up of
> cable in Oz is minimal, as are profits.

The real reason that payTV takeup is poor is because our free to air TV is
pretty decent and they dont offer much more than what you can get for free.

> No doubt saner heads will prevail in the WiMAX roll out...

Bet it wont, largely because telstra has driven down the cost
of adsl to barely more than dialup if you use the net much.

THAT is what is the killer for WiMAX and what will see it mostly
get used by those who cant get adsl or who need portabability.

> (But I, for one, am not holding my breath)

Bugger.
Whatcher? - 15 Aug 2006 06:26 GMT
>> Data has to come in and go out through someone. Telstra will still get
>> income. What is better than power lines is wi-max. The RUMOUR is that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
> If, and it's a bloody big if, they do it at the right price.

True. Not going to pay a bucketload for something new and unusual.

> Years ago, when FoxTel was starting out in Oz, I, and many, _many_ others
> told them that to get good penetration they needed a basic subscription
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> buy *big* packages to get all the channels they want, which, of course,
> they didn't, so take-up of cable in Oz is minimal, as are profits.

Anyone with half a mind could see that idea had sense. There are very few
sports that interest me and I like to be entertained when I turn the TV on.
That's one reason I dont watch it weekends during the day if I am home
(excepting since the Bogey stuff started).

> No doubt saner heads will prevail in the WiMAX roll out...  (But I, for
> one, am not holding my breath)

I sincerely doubt it. I know some stories from the Optus F.O. rollout. One
glaring one - they thought they were finished so shafted the guy who did
most of the planning and a hell of a lot of work. Just told him "last day
today" and he was an employee (high money). So he finished, went elsewhere
where things were fine but not fabulous and 3 months later got a phone call
telling him that he HAS to come back as if he didn't have a choice. He told
them "No F'n way unless you double my salary" and without hesitation they
said "OK" so he went back. They paid more in the 18 months thereafter than
they would have if they had common sense.
Intel Inside - 13 Aug 2006 10:13 GMT
But can you say why he is a "pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist"?.

> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Rod Speed - 13 Aug 2006 11:41 GMT
> But can you say why he is a "pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist"?.

'Born' that way, has no option on that.

>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
virgmob007@netscape.net - 22 Aug 2006 08:20 GMT
> > But can you say why he is a "pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist"?.
>
> 'Born' that way, has no option on that.

Of course, I would assume that you, personally, would take into account
that he is not a Anglo-Saxon, which I would not have a problem with!

> >> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Rod Speed - 22 Aug 2006 12:05 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote

>>> But can you say why he is a "pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist"?.

>> 'Born' that way, has no option on that.

> Of course, I would assume that you, personally,
> would take into account that he is not a Anglo-Saxon,

More fool you.

> which I would not have a problem with!

More fool you.

>>>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677
Damien McBain - 22 Aug 2006 12:08 GMT
virgmob007@netscape.net committed to the eternal aether...:

>>> But can you say why he is a "pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist"?.
>>
>> 'Born' that way, has no option on that.
>
> Of course, I would assume that you, personally, would take into account
> that he is not a Anglo-Saxon, which I would not have a problem with!

Where the hell did that come from? What has race to do with the current
discussion?
I'm having trouble working out what your point is, mostly because of your
shocking diction and cryptically constructed sentence.
David S - 22 Aug 2006 23:55 GMT
> virgmob007@netscape.net committed to the eternal aether...:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I'm having trouble working out what your point is, mostly because of your
> shocking diction and cryptically constructed sentence.

If you're familiar enough with Mr Speed, it makes perfect sense.

Signature

"I stand confirmed" - V©, AKA nigel howe: Internet Guru and business savvy
'CEO' of the vibrant & ever expanding vISP 'HyperOz'

virgmob007@netscape.net - 24 Aug 2006 00:14 GMT
> virgmob007@netscape.net committed to the eternal aether...:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I'm having trouble working out what your point is, mostly because of your
> shocking diction and cryptically constructed sentence.

I realize that it is not politically correct to do so but I think that
race is ultimately of fundamental importance in regard to many
important aspects of life; but I will not elaborate on that as it is
too complex.  Most people will have to learn that the hard way, as is
evident from the many news stories we read today that have a racial
component in some way.

As far as Sol Trujillo is concerned, the fact that he is not an
Anglo-Saxon could be just a  coincidence in relation to his apparent
record of failure in America (although he did a good job of looking
after his personal interests!), and the fact that he causes disquiet in
Australia.  Moreover if Rod Speed has a low opinion of him then that is
good enough for me!  I will just give one web link dealing with the
subject of race: http://www.vdare.com/pb/bell_curve_10yrs.htm
Albinus - 24 Aug 2006 14:13 GMT
> As far as Sol Trujillo is concerned, the fact that he is not an
> Anglo-Saxon could be just a  coincidence in relation to his apparent
> record of failure in America (although he did a good job of looking
> after his personal interests!)

¿qué? :p

(OK, dumb Mexican impersonation over)
Dac - 15 Aug 2006 07:36 GMT
> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677

Apparently they has everything worked out for this fibre network to get them
their $$$.
6mps? My internet is already faster than that.
Rod Speed - 15 Aug 2006 10:47 GMT
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677

> Apparently they has everything worked out for this fibre network to get them their $$$.

Yep, it was always about shafting their competition.

> 6mps? My internet is already faster than that.

It was about a much better speed than that, over 20mps.
Sylvia Else - 23 Aug 2006 23:34 GMT
> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677 

Rod Speed originating a threat?

Must be an imposter.

Sylvia.
Sylvia Else - 23 Aug 2006 23:37 GMT
> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677 

Rod Speed originating a thread?

Must be an imposter.

Sylvia.
Damien McBain - 24 Aug 2006 12:17 GMT
Sylvia Else committed to the eternal aether...:

>> http://businesssunday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=121677 
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Sylvia.

He originates a few in aus.computers, often to ask a question believe it or
not.
I'm not a Speed apologist, just setting the record straight.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.