Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Samsung A501 v A701 "NextG" phone comparison

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Emjaye - 11 Oct 2006 14:57 GMT
I'm looking at the Telstra website. I'm comparing the features between
the two Samsungs currently available for 3G 850 networks.

It says in part:
                        501     701

WAP Compatible           NO      YES
GPRS                     NO      NO
1xRTT                    NO      NO

What do the above mean? It says "Internet capable" and I've checked this
out in the shop. I thought that GPRS and WAP enabled the phone to
connect to the 'net. Is this not the case?

Also it says in the list that neither model plays back video. That is
not correct as the 501 at least does (again, tested it in the shop).
Kubalister - 11 Oct 2006 16:06 GMT
> I'm looking at the Telstra website. I'm comparing the features between
> the two Samsungs currently available for 3G 850 networks.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> GPRS                     NO      NO
> 1xRTT                    NO      NO

That is a totally flawed comparison table, look at this one:
http://www.telstrabusiness.com/NR/rdonlyres/0AC5AA61-365B-44EF-B277-99286EEE1951
/0/TSBM0095_850_handsets.pdf

lauren.lucas@yahoo.com.au - 17 Oct 2006 01:14 GMT
I've just gotten the Samsung A501 and theres a few things I thought I
should point out for possible buyers. The T9 isn't automatic and you
have to change it every time you want to do it. I haven't really had
any other problems but I found out by accident how to show the clock on
the exterior display. I'm sure theres nothing in the book but if you
hold down either the volume buttons or  camera button on the sides, it
lights up the clock on the exterior display so you don't have to keep
opening the phone to check the time.

I don't know about this video thing, i don't really use video.

> I'm looking at the Telstra website. I'm comparing the features between
> the two Samsungs currently available for 3G 850 networks.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Also it says in the list that neither model plays back video. That is
> not correct as the 501 at least does (again, tested it in the shop).
Graeme Willox - 17 Oct 2006 02:05 GMT
> I've just gotten the Samsung A501 and theres a few things I thought I
> should point out for possible buyers. The T9 isn't automatic and you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I don't know about this video thing, i don't really use video.

Does this phone have the provision for an external antenna?
Emjaye - 17 Oct 2006 21:57 GMT
Graeme said....

> Does this phone have the provision for an external antenna?

No. The A501 just has one of those stumpy molded in antennas,
reminiscent of the older GSM phones.
Graeme Willox - 18 Oct 2006 01:08 GMT
> Graeme said....
>
>> Does this phone have the provision for an external antenna?
>
> No. The A501 just has one of those stumpy molded in antennas,
> reminiscent of the older GSM phones.

I thought that might be the case.  It'll be interesting to see how
coverage compares in rural and remote areas without the ability to
connect external antennas.
Emjaye - 18 Oct 2006 06:03 GMT
Graeme said....

>> No. The A501 just has one of those stumpy molded in antennas,
>> reminiscent of the older GSM phones.

> I thought that might be the case.  It'll be interesting to see how
> coverage compares in rural and remote areas without the ability to
> connect external antennas.

If it's anything like my 2280 CDMA unit, probably not much. Its coverage
or signal quality didn't seem to change whether the phone was in the car
kit (Nokia CARK126) which had an external antenna.
Graeme Willox - 18 Oct 2006 06:46 GMT
> Graeme said....
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> or signal quality didn't seem to change whether the phone was in the car
> kit (Nokia CARK126) which had an external antenna.

I think it depends how the antenna connects.  I had a Nokia 6385 and I
currently have a Nokia 6255.  They both use direct physical connections
to attach the external antenna.  Others work on an induction system.
This latter style doesn't seem to show as much improvement as when it is
directly connected.

I had a 2280 as a loan phone for a week or so, but I forget how it connects.
Emjaye - 18 Oct 2006 09:14 GMT
Graeme said....

> I had a 2280 as a loan phone for a week or so, but I forget how it
> connects.

It connects to the car kit via its "pop port" thing at the base.

I remember when I had the 5110 series and later on a CDMA 6385 and a
6310i that had a plug thingy just behind the antenna which connected to
a set of contacts in the cradle. Presumably that was the antenna
connection.
Graeme Willox - 18 Oct 2006 09:22 GMT
> Graeme said....
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> a set of contacts in the cradle. Presumably that was the antenna
> connection.

Yes.  The little plastic / rubber plug comes out and provides a connection.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.