Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vodafone fined $128M for illegally tapping phones

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Bell - 15 Dec 2006 08:47 GMT
From
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20931425%5E15306,00.html

"GREECE'S privacy watchdog has fined mobile carrier Vodafone ?76 million
($128.02 million) over a wiretapping scandal that involved illegal
monitoring of Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis' phone."
Kralizec Craig - 19 Dec 2006 02:49 GMT
>From
>http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20931425%5E15306,00.html

>"GREECE'S privacy watchdog has fined mobile carrier Vodafone ?76 million
>($128.02 million) over a wiretapping scandal that involved illegal
>monitoring of Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis' phone."

Unlike Telstra which the federal government allows to monitor anyone's phone
service on behalf of ASIO and the federal police whenever they want to. So
which is better? I think Vodafone's in a far better position than our slimy
shitball of a national carrier.
Rod Speed - 19 Dec 2006 04:39 GMT
> James Bell <bellj@telstra.com.au> wrote

>> From
>> http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20931425%5E15306,00.html

>> "GREECE'S privacy watchdog has fined mobile carrier Vodafone ?76
>> million ($128.02 million) over a wiretapping scandal that involved
>> illegal monitoring of Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis' phone."

> Unlike Telstra which the federal government allows
> to monitor anyone's phone service on behalf of ASIO
> and the federal police whenever they want to.

Pig ignorant lie.

> So which is better? I think Vodafone's in a far better
> position than our slimy shitball of a national carrier.

Clearly didnt even bother to read that news item, the fine
was because Voda didnt stop 'hackers' getting at that stuff.
atec 77 - 19 Dec 2006 04:58 GMT
>> James Bell <bellj@telstra.com.au> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Pig ignorant lie.
 Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the
recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in
effect correct .

>> So which is better? I think Vodafone's in a far better
>> position than our slimy shitball of a national carrier.
Alice - 19 Dec 2006 05:43 GMT
>  Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the
> recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in
> effect correct .

LOL!! Got any evidence to support this hilarious conspiracy theory?
Blue  Heeler - 19 Dec 2006 06:34 GMT
> > Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the
> > recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in
> > effect correct .
>
> LOL!! Got any evidence to support this hilarious conspiracy theory?

Not buying into the conspiracy theory, just a question.

How does something that really does exist like Project Echelon work? Do
they record all international calls and analyse them later, or are the
calls monitored in real time and the red lights turned on if certain
"key" words are used.

And, given that the existence of Project Echelon is admitted to, what
else is around that is not admitted to?

--
atec 77 - 19 Dec 2006 06:59 GMT
Blue Heeler wrote:

>>> Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the
>>> recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> And, given that the existence of Project Echelon is admitted to, what
> else is around that is not admitted to?

Plenty , there is of course the project in Unzud which doesn't exist ,
everything is recoded for posterity but it doesn't exist ( of course)
Dare I mention "P i n e g a p " ?
Rod Speed - 19 Dec 2006 08:51 GMT
Blue Heeler <woof_@bark.net> wrote
>> atec 77 wrote:

>>> Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise
>>> and the recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco
>>> dept's so he is in effect correct .

>> LOL!! Got any evidence to support this hilarious conspiracy theory?

> Not buying into the conspiracy theory, just a question.

> How does something that really does exist like Project Echelon work?

If I told you that I would have to kill you.

> Do they record all international calls and analyse them later,

Corse they dont, not even feasible.

> or are the calls monitored in real time

Corse they dont, not even feasible.

> and the red lights turned on if certain "key" words are used.

Corse they dont, not even feasible.

And even the stupidest crim can avoid using those words, stupid.

> And, given that the existence of Project Echelon is
> admitted to, what else is around that is not admitted to?

If I told you that I would have to kill you.
Michael - 21 Dec 2006 19:50 GMT
>> > Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the
>> > recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> How does something that really does exist like Project Echelon work? Do

Who said it even did exist?

> they record all international calls and analyse them later, or are the
> calls monitored in real time and the red lights turned on if certain
> "key" words are used.

Both approaches work.

> And, given that the existence of Project Echelon is admitted to, what
> else is around that is not admitted to?

Ask your federal law enforcement and military
Rod Speed - 22 Dec 2006 01:52 GMT
> Blue Heeler <woof_@bark.net> wrote
>>> atec 77 wrote

>>>> Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the recoding are easily
>>>> obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in effect correct .

>>> LOL!! Got any evidence to support this hilarious conspiracy theory?

>> Not buying into the conspiracy theory, just a question.

>> How does something that really does exist like Project Echelon work?

> Who said it even did exist?

Oh, just some fools like the US Congress. What would they know ?

>> Do they record all international calls and analyse them later, or are the calls monitored in real
>> time and the red lights turned on if certain "key" words are used.

> Both approaches work.

>> And, given that the existence of Project Echelon is admitted to, what else is around that is not
>> admitted to?

> Ask your federal law enforcement and military

Pathetic, really.
atec 77 - 19 Dec 2006 06:56 GMT
>>  Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise and the
>> recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in
>> effect correct .
>
> LOL!! Got any evidence to support this hilarious conspiracy theory?
No , but it's no sillier than roddles crap .
Rod Speed - 19 Dec 2006 08:48 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote
>>> James Bell <bellj@telstra.com.au> wrote

>>>> From
>>>> http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20931425%5E15306,00.html

>>>> "GREECE'S privacy watchdog has fined mobile carrier Vodafone ?76
>>>> million ($128.02 million) over a wiretapping scandal that involved
>>>> illegal monitoring of Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis' phone."

>>> Unlike Telstra which the federal government allows
>>> to monitor anyone's phone service on behalf of ASIO
>>> and the federal police whenever they want to.

>> Pig ignorant lie.

> Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise

Pig ignorant lie.

> and the recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's

Pig ignorant lie.

> so he is in effect correct .

Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.

>>> So which is better? I think Vodafone's in a far better
>>> position than our slimy shitball of a national carrier.
atec 77 - 19 Dec 2006 12:01 GMT
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> James Bell <bellj@telstra.com.au> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Pig ignorant lie.
 Fact you silly old ill informed fart ,

>> and the recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's
>
> Pig ignorant lie.
 prove me wrong bitch

>> so he is in effect correct .
>
> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.
 So hows philthys cick , still in your arse  ?
Rod Speed - 19 Dec 2006 19:27 GMT
atec77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote
>> atec 77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>> Kralizec Craig <cd@lios.apana.org.au> wrote

>>>>>> From
>>>>>> http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20931425%5E15306,00.html

>>>>>> "GREECE'S privacy watchdog has fined mobile carrier Vodafone ?76
>>>>>> million ($128.02 million) over a wiretapping scandal that involved illegal monitoring of
>>>>>> Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis' phone."

>>>>> Unlike Telstra which the federal government allows
>>>>> to monitor anyone's phone service on behalf of ASIO
>>>>> and the federal police whenever they want to.

>>>> Pig ignorant lie.

>>> Actually all calls are recoded unless you assert otherwise

>> Pig ignorant lie.

> Fact you silly old ill informed fart ,

Pig ignorant lie.

>>> and the recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's

>> Pig ignorant lie.

>  prove me wrong bitch

YOU made that stupid pig ignorant claim.

YOU get to do the proving.

THATS how it works, fuckwit child.

>>> so he is in effect correct .

>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.

<reams of your puerile sh.t any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>
atec 77 - 19 Dec 2006 20:11 GMT
> atec77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote
>>> atec 77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Pig ignorant lie.
 You dent being a purile old ill informed fart ?
 BEEP
youre wrong again roddles

>>>> and the recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> YOU get to do the proving.

How it work's roddles is we pick a subject you cant disprove then you
fail to do so cussing in the process and proving yet again you are an
old failed cocksucker .
Rod Speed - 20 Dec 2006 06:11 GMT
Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind
atec77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote just the pathetic
excuse for bullshit that it always end up having to resort
to when its got done like a f.cking dinner, as always.
atec 77 - 20 Dec 2006 07:27 GMT
> Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind
> roddles-spedus-no-nuthing@bullshite.com  wrote just the pathetic
> excuse for bullshit that it always end up having to resort
> to when its got done like a f.cking dinner, as always.
> Nothing but unconfirmed lies and crapola
Rod Speed - 20 Dec 2006 18:58 GMT
Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind
atec77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote just the pathetic
excuse for bullshit that it always end up having to resort
to when its got done like a f.cking dinner, as always.
Kate - 20 Dec 2006 20:38 GMT
On Thu, 30 Kislev 5767 04:58 Rod Speed translated the ancient runes thusly:

> Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind
> atec77  <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote just the pathetic
> excuse for bullshit that it always end up having to resort
> to when its got done like a f.cking dinner, as always.

Why don't you two get a room, instead of just endlessly repeating your love
notes to each other on here?

Kate
Signature

"Job tvoyjemadj!"
 -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v

Michael - 21 Dec 2006 19:44 GMT
>>> James Bell <bellj@telstra.com.au> wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> recoding are easily obtainable bu certain govco dept's so he is in effect
> correct .

Calls to customer service?

What on earth are you lot on about?
Michael - 21 Dec 2006 19:44 GMT
>>From
>>http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20931425%5E15306,00.html
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> which is better? I think Vodafone's in a far better position than our
> slimy

What on earth are you on about, Crazy Craig?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.