 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / May 2007WTD to join class-action against Telstra Mobile for destroying business communication by Feb. 2008.
I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. The reason , Telstra Mobile is refusing to register the same mobile number when being forced to change from the old mobile network to the new mobile network. Telstra Mobile information and infrastructure is simply not ready for change in Feb. 2008. Which means in 2008 when I change my mobile phone to 3G or other, I'll have to change my phone number? Where can I join the class-action against Telstra Mobile phone? Any information will be appreciated. By Feb. 2008 it is predicted 80,000 Australia business using Telstra Mobile phone as their way of communication will be forced out of business because their mobile number has been forcibly removed or change. At the moment 25 millions mobile phones are controlled directly or indirectly through Telstra Australia Mobile . Already a large number of business find impossible to keep their old mobile number with 3G and other new networks. Which mean business cards , business letter heads, website , local and overseas customers etc can not be organized and warn by Feb. 2008. Instead of looking after the Australian business, Telstra Australia is selling DVD's door to door. "Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck ....." Is it technically difficult for Telstra Mobile to allow business people to keep their same telephone number when changing to the new 3G from now until Feb. 2008? Technically easy to do. Why does Telstra Mobile refuses to do it? Because Telstra Mobile has to find an excuse to rip off the Australian businesses. What about the TIO? The Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman (TIO) is just an other name for Telstra. The board of the TIO is fully controlled by Telstra since 1999. 80,000 oz business going baste and 500,000 oz business seriously affected because Telstra Mobile has no respect for Australian business.These are the statistics for 2008. What about the Minister for telecommunications and Howard Government in all of this? Interesting to see if theMinister for telecommunications and Howard Government can control Telstra Mobile? Georges I upgraded two phones to Next g yesterday and still have our old numbers. >I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by > Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Georges >I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by > Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. Where did you hear this? > The reason , Telstra Mobile is refusing to register the same mobile > number when being forced to change from the old mobile network to the > new mobile network. Utter bullshit. Has been possible even before MNP, within Telstra. > Telstra Mobile information and infrastructure is simply not ready for > change in Feb. 2008. Utter bullshit. > Which means in 2008 when I change my mobile phone to 3G or other, I'll > have to change my phone number? > > Where can I join the class-action against Telstra Mobile phone? > Any information will be appreciated. Put your head up you arse for starters. > By Feb. 2008 it is predicted 80,000 Australia business using Telstra > Mobile phone as their way of communication will be forced out of > business because their mobile number has been forcibly removed or > change. Where did you source such bullshit? > At the moment 25 millions mobile phones are controlled directly or > indirectly through Telstra Australia Mobile . No such organisation as "Telstra Australia Mobile". > Already a large number of business find impossible to keep their old > mobile number with 3G and other new networks. Bullshit, you liar. > Which mean business cards , business letter heads, website , local and > overseas customers etc can not be organized and warn by Feb. 2008. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Why does Telstra Mobile refuses to do it? When will you learn to write/type English in coherent logical sentences? > Because Telstra Mobile has to find an excuse to rip off the Australian > businesses. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > for Telstra. > The board of the TIO is fully controlled by Telstra since 1999. hahah yeah right. Funny John Pinnock aint on any telco payroll. > 80,000 oz business going baste and 500,000 oz business seriously > affected because Telstra Mobile has no respect for Australian > business.These are the statistics for 2008. > > What about the Minister for telecommunications and Howard Government > in all of this? No such Minister for "telecommunications". Do your homework raghead. > Interesting to see if theMinister for telecommunications and Howard > Government can control Telstra Mobile? > > Georges Can't even spell it's own name right  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 86 lines] > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com Your statements about Telstra Mobile doing all these amazing things is not documented by any websites. Document your arguments. In other words no one can verify what you're saying. Typical Telstra management attitude. You need an oil and nappy change. Georges >> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 99 lines] > > Georges Take a look at my other postings and you will soon see that I am one of the MOST critical of Telstra. However when dickheads like you write absolutely absurb and ridiculous bullshit in posts then you deserve to be labelled as (similar to Howard) "the skid-mark on the bedsheet of aus.comms posters". SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 111 lines] > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com Talk well but CAN NOT deliver any FACTS or WEBSITES. Georges >> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 127 lines] > > Georges And neither did you fuckwit, just invented some lies and bullshit stories. If I was Telstra's legal department, I'd have you in my sights for court action. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> [quoted text clipped - 130 lines] > > And neither did you fuckwit, just invented some lies and bullshit stories. > If I was Telstra's legal department, I'd have you in my sights for court action. More fool you. They aint actually THAT stupid. >>>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> [quoted text clipped - 136 lines] > > More fool you. They aint actually THAT stupid. Pity about the COTS cases and anyone who spoke against Telstra. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 138 lines] >> > Pity about the COTS cases and anyone who spoke against Telstra. It was COT cases, and THEY were the ones who generally took Telstra to court, not the other way around. SignatureKwyj. > >>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>news:1178431141.484282.149650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 147 lines] > > Kwyj. Kwyjibo, you are correct about the COTS cases. Don't you know Rod Speed is a "spook" working secretly for Telstra. Probably a manager renting DVD for Telstra and at his many spare time posting. The usual Rod Speed talk , documenting nothing but talking a lot #@$ $#@#$#$. Rod Speed it's hard to swallow the COTS cases? Georges > Kwyjibo <kwyj...@removeozdebate.com> wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>> I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra >>>>>>>>>> Mobile by Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. >>>>>>>>> Where did you hear this? >>>>>>>>>> The reason , Telstra Mobile is refusing to register the same >>>>>>>>>> mobile number when being forced to change from the old mobile >>>>>>>>>> network to the new mobile network. >>>>>>>>> Utter bullshit. Has been possible even before MNP, within Telstra. >>>>>>>>>> Telstra Mobile information and infrastructure is simply not >>>>>>>>>> ready for change in Feb. 2008. >>>>>>>>> Utter bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> Which means in 2008 when I change my mobile phone to 3G or >>>>>>>>>> other, I'll have to change my phone number? >>>>>>>>>> Where can I join the class-action against Telstra Mobile >>>>>>>>>> phone? Any information will be appreciated. >>>>>>>>> Put your head up you arse for starters. >>>>>>>>>> By Feb. 2008 it is predicted 80,000 Australia business using Telstra >>>>>>>>>> Mobile phone as their way of communication will be forced >>>>>>>>>> out of business because their mobile number has been >>>>>>>>>> forcibly removed or change. >>>>>>>>> Where did you source such bullshit? >>>>>>>>>> At the moment 25 millions mobile phones are controlled >>>>>>>>>> directly or indirectly through Telstra Australia Mobile . >>>>>>>>> No such organisation as "Telstra Australia Mobile". >>>>>>>>>> Already a large number of business find impossible to keep >>>>>>>>>> their old mobile number with 3G and other new networks. >>>>>>>>> Bullshit, you liar. >>>>>>>>>> Which mean business cards , business letter heads, website , local and >>>>>>>>>> overseas customers etc can not be organized and warn by Feb. 2008. >>>>>>>>>> Instead of looking after the Australian business, Telstra >>>>>>>>>> Australia is selling DVD's door to door. >>>>>>>>>> "Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck ....." >>>>>>>>>> Is it technically difficult for Telstra Mobile to allow >>>>>>>>>> business people to keep their same telephone number when >>>>>>>>>> changing to the new 3G from now until Feb. 2008? >>>>>>>>>> Technically easy to do. >>>>>>>>>> Why does Telstra Mobile refuses to do it? >>>>>>>>> When will you learn to write/type English in coherent logical sentences? >>>>>>>>>> Because Telstra Mobile has to find an excuse to rip off the Australian >>>>>>>>>> businesses. >>>>>>>>>> What about the TIO? >>>>>>>>>> The Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman (TIO) is just an >>>>>>>>>> other name for Telstra. >>>>>>>>>> The board of the TIO is fully controlled by Telstra since >>>>>>>>>> 1999. >>>>>>>>> hahah yeah right. Funny John Pinnock aint on any telco payroll. >>>>>>>>>> 80,000 oz business going baste and 500,000 oz business >>>>>>>>>> seriously affected because Telstra Mobile has no respect for >>>>>>>>>> Australian business.These are the statistics for 2008. >>>>>>>>>> What about the Minister for telecommunications and Howard >>>>>>>>>> Government in all of this? >>>>>>>>> No such Minister for "telecommunications". Do your homework raghead. >>>>>>>>>> Interesting to see if theMinister for telecommunications and >>>>>>>>>> Howard Government can control Telstra Mobile? >>>>>>>>>> Georges >>>>>>>>> Can't even spell it's own name right >>>>>>>> Your statements about Telstra Mobile doing all these amazing >>>>>>>> things is not documented by any websites. >>>>>>>> Document your arguments. >>>>>>>> In other words no one can verify what you're saying. >>>>>>>> Typical Telstra management attitude. >>>>>>>> You need an oil and nappy change. >>>>>>> Take a look at my other postings and you will soon see that I am one of the >>>>>>> MOST critical of Telstra. However when dickheads like you write absolutely >>>>>>> absurb and ridiculous bullshit in posts then you deserve to be labelled as >>>>>>> (similar to Howard) "the skid-mark on the bedsheet of aus.comms posters". -- >>>>>> Talk well but CAN NOT deliver any FACTS or WEBSITES. >>>>> And neither did you fuckwit, just invented some lies and bullshit stories. >>>>> If I was Telstra's legal department, I'd have you in my sights for court action. >>>> More fool you. They aint actually THAT stupid. >>> Pity about the COTS cases and anyone who spoke against Telstra. >> It was COT cases, and THEY were the ones who >> generally took Telstra to court, not the other way around. > Kwyjibo, you are correct about the COTS cases. > Don't you know Rod Speed is a "spook" working secretly for Telstra. Just another of your pathetic little wogchild conspiracy theorys. > Probably a manager renting DVD for Telstra and at his many spare time posting. > The usual Rod Speed talk , documenting nothing but talking a lot #@$ $#@#$#$. Leaves your mindless wogchild sh.t for dead. > Rod Speed it's hard to swallow the COTS cases? Nope. Pity they dont have a damned thing to do with what was being discussed, TELSTRA SUING ANYONE WHO POSTS sh.t ABOUT THEM. Like I said, not even Telstra is actually THAT stupid, wogchild. >>>>> <gnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 137 lines] >> >> More fool you. They aint actually THAT stupid. > Pity about the COTS cases Nothing like this pathetic clown. AND Telstra didnt initiate any court action anyway. > and anyone who spoke against Telstra. Telstra didnt initiate any court action against those either, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. > Telstra didnt initiate any court action against those either, you pathetic > excuse for a lying bullshit artist. Yeah, they just disconnected their phones. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> Telstra didnt initiate any court action against those either, you >> pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. >> > Yeah, they just disconnected their phones. Nope. SignatureKwyj. >> Telstra didnt initiate any court action against those either, you >> pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. >> > Yeah, they just disconnected their phones. Yep, and wasnt actually stupid enough to sue them when they howled about Telstra, cretin. >> Telstra didnt initiate any court action against those either, you >> pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. >> > Yeah, they just disconnected their phones. Because the stupid fuckwits didnt pay their bills. Stamping your foot and sh.tting into your nappy got them nowhere Some is telling you porky pies - I changed from CDMA to nextG 6weeks ago - took the Telstra shop 10 minutes to change my CDMA number to the NEXTG phone they gave me, and xfer all my numbers from the old phone to the new one. The whole thing was painless (well except for the $$$) David > I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by > Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. > The reason , Telstra Mobile is refusing to register the same mobile > number when being forced to change from the old mobile network to the > new mobile network. >I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by > Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. > The reason , Telstra Mobile is refusing to register the same mobile > number when being forced to change from the old mobile network to the > new mobile network. Technicalities prevent it from occurring. Like it or lump it > Which means in 2008 when I change my mobile phone to 3G or other, I'll > have to change my phone number? Nope. Only CDMA prepaid to 3G prepaid > By Feb. 2008 it is predicted 80,000 Australia business using Telstra > Mobile phone as their way of communication will be forced out of > business because their mobile number has been forcibly removed or > change. Crap sh.t > At the moment 25 millions mobile phones are controlled directly or > indirectly through Telstra Australia Mobile . You reckon? > Is it technically difficult for Telstra Mobile to allow business > people to keep their same telephone number when changing to the new > 3G from now until Feb. 2008? Yes > Technically easy to do. No > Why does Telstra Mobile refuses to do it? You explain to me which server transactions to use to complete a CDMA prepaid to 3G prepaid transaction that will allow you to keep your mobile number? What are you talking about? Are you implying that you cannot MNP to Next-G prepaid? >>I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by >> Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > prepaid to 3G prepaid transaction that will allow you to keep your mobile > number? SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > What are you talking about? Are you implying that you cannot MNP to Next-G > prepaid? A change from CDMA to GSM (NextG is just GSM with a few extra product codes) is NOT a port, it is a tech-transfer (TTF). It has never been possible to transfer from prepaid in one technology to prepaid in another technology in one transaction. And I don't think there are any plans to enhance the system to allow it >>>I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by >>> Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >> prepaid to 3G prepaid transaction that will allow you to keep your mobile >> number? >> What are you talking about? Are you implying that you cannot MNP to >> Next-G prepaid? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > And I don't think there are any plans to enhance the system to allow it So everyone on CDMA prepaid going to Next-G prepaid will lose their number? What utter bullshit. So much for Sol's "one click" strategy; another cum-stain on the existing skid-marked-bedsheet of Australian telecommunications known as Telstra. >>>>I have heard a class action is being mounted against Telstra Mobile by >>>> Australian business using Telstra Mobile phone. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >>> prepaid to 3G prepaid transaction that will allow you to keep your >>> mobile number? SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.