Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Samsung Blackjack?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peelah Ben Arhna - 06 May 2007 04:15 GMT
Do you reckon that this phone would work here on Telstra's NextG
network?

http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?q_list=true&q_pho
neName=Samsung+BlackJack&q_sku=sku840008

James Bell - 06 May 2007 05:03 GMT
> Do you reckon that this phone would work here on Telstra's NextG
> network?
>
> http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?q_list=true&q_pho
neName=Samsung+BlackJack&q_sku=sku840008

It is already being sold here.. however it's let down by the lousy camera
and poor battery life..
Peelah Ben Arhna - 07 May 2007 00:54 GMT
James said....

>> http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?q_list=tru
>> e&q_phoneName=Samsung+BlackJack&q_sku=sku840008

> It is already being sold here.. however it's let down by the lousy
> camera and poor battery life..

Who is selling it, and does it work on NextG?

As for cameras and batteries, tell me something new. I've yet to see any
current moble phone that has fancy color screens etc. having any sort of
decent battery life, nor have I seen anything decent, camera-wise.
Michael J - 12 May 2007 08:09 GMT
> James said....
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Who is selling it, and does it work on NextG?

Telstra and yes
Peelah Ben Arhna - 13 May 2007 03:07 GMT
Michael said....

>>> It is already being sold here.. however it's let down by the lousy
>>> camera and poor battery life..
>>
>> Who is selling it, and does it work on NextG?
>
> Telstra and yes

Yep. Just found it. It wasn't listed when I posted the question the
other day.

Telstra sells it for $999 outright or on a plan starting at $60.

Decided to see what people overseas might pay for it.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/wireless/bundle-list/002-1257191-3052817?ASIN=B000KJS8CI

The phone retails for around $500USD or around $608 AUD. A big
difference between Telstra's pricing and Cingular's for example.

The plan associated with this phone seems to be more attractive than the
comparable ones with Telstra. For starters the per minute charge is less
than half of what I'm paying now.

A few on Ebay are going for under $600 at the moment.

Thing is, the unit doesn't appear to have a touch screen. It'd be a
handy feature if it did have one.
DJ! - 12 May 2007 12:06 GMT
>nor have I seen anything decent, camera-wise.

K800i isn't too shabby IMHO

http://www.flickr.com/cameras/sonyericsson/k800i/

...though battery life sucks hard when it roams between 3G and 2.5G
services.

DJ!
James Bell - 12 May 2007 15:09 GMT
>>nor have I seen anything decent, camera-wise.
>
> K800i isn't too shabby IMHO

Yes that was part of my point.. my 2 year old k750i has a camera that pisses
all over the spanking-new Samsung BlackJack..
Michael J - 13 May 2007 01:24 GMT
>>>nor have I seen anything decent, camera-wise.
>>
>> K800i isn't too shabby IMHO
>
> Yes that was part of my point.. my 2 year old k750i has a camera that
> pisses all over the spanking-new Samsung BlackJack..

Its not designed to be a camera phone, you dick.

Dont you understand segmented marketing?
James Bell - 14 May 2007 05:38 GMT
>> Its not designed to be a camera phone, you dick.

Then why have a camera?
Michael J - 14 May 2007 09:11 GMT
>>> Its not designed to be a camera phone, you dick.
>
> Then why have a camera?

Its PRIMARY function is not a camera phone
James Bell - 14 May 2007 10:42 GMT
> Its PRIMARY function is not a camera phone

So the camera is so nasty as to be useless, why have it?

I ask this because I'm waiting for you to say their advertising is "has a
camera phone for emergencies!"
Michael J - 15 May 2007 22:28 GMT
>> Its PRIMARY function is not a camera phone
>
> So the camera is so nasty as to be useless, why have it?

You can draw that conclusion, if you wish.

> I ask this because I'm waiting for you to say their advertising is "has a
> camera phone for emergencies!"

You're a tool, fool.
Spokes - 14 May 2007 14:11 GMT
> >>> Its not designed to be a camera phone, you dick.
>
> > Then why have a camera?
>
> Its PRIMARY function is not a camera phone

Also, you're not able to make video calls with that phone either.
Argusy - 27 May 2007 00:16 GMT
>>>>>Its not designed to be a camera phone, you dick.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Also, you're not able to make video calls with that phone either.

And it doesn't take notes with a single button push, either.
(I work in security - phone, camera and note taking essential)

Argusy
Michael J - 13 May 2007 01:24 GMT
>>nor have I seen anything decent, camera-wise.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ...though battery life sucks hard when it roams between 3G and 2.5G
> services.

The Nokia N73 has a 2.0megapixel camera
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.