Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Pagers - where to purchase

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Matt - 19 Jun 2007 03:32 GMT
I am looking to purchase a pager - preferably an Apollo 924, Apollo A25 or
an ATI Corporate. Has to be in the low VHF range and compatible with POCSAG
(not FLEX).

There are a couple on eBay in the US, but does anybody know any retailers in
Australia that sell them:
a) without having to sign up to a contract, and
b) unlocked.

The screen on my current pager has seen better days, but the provider I'm
with wants over $200 for a new unit - considering I can get one for half
that on eBay and program it myself it doesn't seem worth it.

Any help appreciated,
Matt
Simon Templar - 19 Jun 2007 04:35 GMT
> I am looking to purchase a pager - preferably an Apollo 924, Apollo A25 or
> an ATI Corporate. Has to be in the low VHF range and compatible with POCSAG
> (not FLEX).

Have a look at <http://www.unicompl.com/>, I have purchased from Eric at
Unicom in the past and he is great to deal with.

Signature

The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

Matt - 19 Jun 2007 06:02 GMT
>> I am looking to purchase a pager - preferably an Apollo 924, Apollo A25
>> or an ATI Corporate. Has to be in the low VHF range and compatible with
>> POCSAG (not FLEX).
>
> Have a look at <http://www.unicompl.com/>, I have purchased from Eric at
> Unicom in the past and he is great to deal with.

Thanks, I might give him a call.

I only see his company branded pagers - before I contact him, do you know if
he stocks other brands?

Cheers,
Matt
Paul Day - 19 Jun 2007 05:32 GMT
> I am looking to purchase a pager - preferably an Apollo 924, Apollo A25 or
> an ATI Corporate. Has to be in the low VHF range and compatible with POCSAG
> (not FLEX).

OT, but why would anyone use a pager instead of SMS these days?

PD

Signature

Paul Day

Simon Templar - 19 Jun 2007 05:41 GMT
> OT, but why would anyone use a pager instead of SMS these days?
>
> PD

The primary reason is time sensitive messages.  The phone carriers are
too tight arsed to set up SMS properly to ensure messages are sent
quickly and effectively.

Bloody foolish in my opinion with several Emergency Services in Victoria
recently having set up a state wide paging network for themselves.  If
European Emergency Services can make use of Priority SMS, we should be
able to here as well.

Signature

The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

Paul Day - 19 Jun 2007 06:38 GMT
> The primary reason is time sensitive messages.  The phone carriers are
> too tight arsed to set up SMS properly to ensure messages are sent
> quickly and effectively.

Indeed. Are there any commercial paging networks still active or are
there only private, job-specific networks around?

> Bloody foolish in my opinion with several Emergency Services in
> Victoria recently having set up a state wide paging network for
> themselves.  If European Emergency Services can make use of Priority
> SMS, we should be able to here as well.

Can a GSM network provide an SLA on a priority SMS during _serious_
network congestion? eg, London Bombings grinding networks to a halt. I
was in Bristol that day and couldn't use my phone all day on any
network.

PD

Signature

Paul Day

John Henderson - 19 Jun 2007 07:14 GMT
> Can a GSM network provide an SLA on a priority SMS during
> _serious_ network congestion? eg, London Bombings grinding
> networks to a halt. I was in Bristol that day and couldn't use
> my phone all day on any network.

They might have been using the "access control class" facility
to keep the network relatively clear for emergency traffic.

There are 15 access control classes, with each SIM being
allocated to one of these.  10 apply to ordinary users, and
every ordinary SIM is randomly assigned to one of these.  One
or more classes can be denied access to the network at any
time.

In a severe network overload situation, a few classes at a time
on a rotational basis can be denied access so that others can
carry on reasonably normally for a time.

In an emergency, all 10 "normal" classes might be denied access
so that the 5 "high priority" classes of user can have the
network to themselves.

Refer GSM 02.11, GSM 11.11, 3GPP 22.011 and 3GPP 31.102.

John
other-news@usa.net - 19 Jun 2007 10:04 GMT
>> The primary reason is time sensitive messages.  The phone carriers are
>> too tight arsed to set up SMS properly to ensure messages are sent
>> quickly and effectively.

.
.
.

>Can a GSM network provide an SLA on a priority SMS during _serious_
>network congestion? eg, London Bombings grinding networks to a halt. I
>was in Bristol that day and couldn't use my phone all day on any
>network.

The authorities turned off  network access, that's why. The bad guys
use phones for doing bad things.

Seem pretty standard procedure from what is in the press.
Michael J - 22 Jun 2007 09:47 GMT
>> OT, but why would anyone use a pager instead of SMS these days?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> tight arsed to set up SMS properly to ensure messages are sent quickly and
> effectively.

Mine work fine. Have for years and years
Simon Templar - 22 Jun 2007 11:12 GMT
> Mine work fine. Have for years and years

That may well be the case, but there are many instances of delays that
Emergency Services cannot risk.  That's unfortunately why they refuse to
make use of SMS for primary call outs.

Signature

The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

Michael J - 23 Jun 2007 12:24 GMT
>> Mine work fine. Have for years and years
>
> That may well be the case, but there are many instances of delays that
> Emergency Services cannot risk.  That's unfortunately why they refuse to
> make use of SMS for primary call outs.

More fool them
Matt - 19 Jun 2007 06:10 GMT
>> I am looking to purchase a pager - preferably an Apollo 924, Apollo A25
>> or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> OT, but why would anyone use a pager instead of SMS these days?

I get that all the time :)

The nature of my work requires me to be 'on-call' 24/7. While SMS works
great, it means I have to keep my phone switched on and audible at all times
(or have two phones).

Utilising a pager means I switch my phone off at night or when I'm
unavailable and all calls get diverted a message service. Non-urgent callers
leave a voice message which I retrieve later, urgent callers get diverted to
the pager which alerts me. The diversion and yearly paging costs are
equivalent to peanuts - and it means I get a good nights sleep.

The only downside, as I have just found, it when I need a new pager!

Cheers,
Matt
Paul Day - 19 Jun 2007 06:40 GMT
> "Paul Day" <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote in message
> > OT, but why would anyone use a pager instead of SMS these days?
>
> I get that all the time :)

No doubt. :) But I assumed there was some distinct advantages!

> Utilising a pager means I switch my phone off at night or when I'm
> unavailable and all calls get diverted a message service. Non-urgent
> callers leave a voice message which I retrieve later, urgent callers
> get diverted to the pager which alerts me. The diversion and yearly
> paging costs are equivalent to peanuts - and it means I get a good
> nights sleep.

Fair enough. So there are obviously still commercial paging networks
active in .au.

PD

Signature

Paul Day

Michael J - 22 Jun 2007 09:48 GMT
> The nature of my work requires me to be 'on-call' 24/7. While SMS works
> great, it means I have to keep my phone switched on and audible at all
> times (or have two phones).

When I was oncall 24/7, SMS was good enough for me
John Henderson - 22 Jun 2007 13:31 GMT
>> The nature of my work requires me to be 'on-call' 24/7. While
>> SMS works great, it means I have to keep my phone switched on
>> and audible at all times (or have two phones).
>
> When I was oncall 24/7, SMS was good enough for me

It wasn't for me.  Did you need to potentially answer to the
Coroner if you couldn't be contacted?

John
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.