> Didn't I tell you schlubs that this would happen a year ago?
Nope.
> A close friend started a thread called "T3 shares are gonna boom", and that is EXACTLY what has happened.
You wouldnt know what a real boom was if it went off under your lard arse.
> From
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22787247-664,00.html
> INVESTORS who gambled on the full privatisation of Telstra are well in the black a year after T3 shares began their
> listed life.
Plenty of other stocks left those for dead, fuckwit.
> Since listing on the Australian Securities Exchange this day last year, T3 instalment receipts have risen 56.5 per
> cent from their initial $2 price, peaking at $3.50 in May.
Plenty of other stocks left those for dead, fuckwit.
> Telstra ordinary shares have risen 28 per cent in the same period.
Plenty of other stocks left those for dead, fuckwit.
> While investors still have to pay a final instalment of $1.60 in six months,
Funny that.
> analysts say T3, which boosted the Government's coffers by $15.5 billion, has exceeded expectations.
Only for those with pathetically inadequate expectations, fuckwit.
> "At one stage advisers were having to offer all sorts of carrots and incentives to actually get the float away,"
> Macquarie Equities client adviser David Halliday said.
> "Twelve months down the track and we're more than 50 per cent better off -- and that's not including the very healthy
> income stream that's been provided as well."
Is this where we're all sposed to cream our jeans or sumfin, child ?
> A 14 per cent fully-franked dividend yield was the float's main attraction.
And that is funded how, fuckwit ?
> Other sweeteners included a bigger-than-expected share entitlement
> and a bonus share offer for holding the stock for 18 months.
Only a fool would actually be that stupid.
Michael - 25 Nov 2007 10:40 GMT
>> Didn't I tell you schlubs that this would happen a year ago?
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Plenty of other stocks left those for dead, fuckwit.
Feel free to supply examples of other stocks that have risen that such in
same period.
Certainly a few mineral stocks, which would be unaffordable to most anyway.
John Phillips - 25 Nov 2007 10:43 GMT
> Certainly a few mineral stocks, which would be unaffordable to most
> anyway.
Nonsense statement. Just buy less. Simple.
Michael - 25 Nov 2007 11:05 GMT
>> Certainly a few mineral stocks, which would be unaffordable to most
>> anyway.
>
> Nonsense statement. Just buy less. Simple.
Sure, just buy 10 shares, huh?
John Phillips - 25 Nov 2007 18:05 GMT
> > Nonsense statement. Just buy less. Simple.
>
> Sure, just buy 10 shares, huh?
Nothing stopping you.
Rod Speed - 25 Nov 2007 20:57 GMT
>>> Certainly a few mineral stocks, which would be unaffordable to most
>>> anyway.
>>
>> Nonsense statement. Just buy less. Simple.
>
> Sure, just buy 10 shares, huh?
Just buy enough so you end up with the same total amount, fool.
And there are plenty of mining stocks that are MUCH cheaper than T3 receipts anyway, fool.
Kwyjibo - 25 Nov 2007 12:31 GMT
>>> Didn't I tell you schlubs that this would happen a year ago?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Feel free to supply examples of other stocks that have risen that such in
> same period.
One stock I got on to jumped 300% in the 3 months since their IPO. Plenty of
others have done similar things.

Signature
Kwyj.
Allan Parkington - 25 Nov 2007 12:39 GMT
> One stock I got on to jumped 300% in the 3 months since their IPO. Plenty
> of others have done similar things.
In the same period? Surely such a massive win you can recall the details..
or are you talkin out your arse again?
Kwyjibo - 26 Nov 2007 07:38 GMT
>> One stock I got on to jumped 300% in the 3 months since their IPO. Plenty
>> of others have done similar things.
>
> In the same period?
Nope. It was all within the last 6 months.
> Surely such a massive win you can recall the details..
I certainly can. They launched at US$30 and were going for over US$120
within 10 weeks of the float.
> or are you talkin out your arse again?
Nope.

Signature
Kwyj.
Allan Parkington - 26 Nov 2007 11:51 GMT
> I certainly can. They launched at US$30 and were going for over US$120
> within 10 weeks of the float.
And the name of this magical stock?
Rod Speed - 25 Nov 2007 20:55 GMT
>>> Didn't I tell you schlubs that this would happen a year ago?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Certainly a few mineral stocks, which would be unaffordable to most anyway.
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never
ever had a f.cking clue about what buying stocks is about, ever.