> Get we do see the union goons get what they want tho.
Seeing as less than 20% of workers are even in a union, highly unlikely..
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod - what do you think of the election result?
>> That the voters clearly decided that with the economy
>> booming like it is, that anyone can run the country.
> Or they decided that a strong economy for some, didn't make up for all the other crap that Howard has pushed.
They clearly didnt give a flying red f.ck about that in the
previous election that even delivered control of the senate.
>> It remains to be seen if the dud and the
>> duck will stuff it up as badly as keating did.
> Keating was the one who de-regulated the economy
Pig ignorant lie. That would have happened if Mal had been reelected, fuckwit.
> and started the dream run,
Tell that to those who decided to apply the baseball bat to cheating, fuckwit.
>> Guess we do see the union goons get what they want tho.
> Seeing as less than 20% of workers are even in a union, highly unlikely..
Have fun explaining the number of union goons in the dud's govt.
We've already seen those union goons get work choices binned, even when
hordes of them like in the WA mining industry want to see them retained
because they have delivered much higher than otherwise wages and conditions.
Even Carpenter has enough of a clue to realise they shouldnt be binned.
No the fuckwit dud and his bimbo sidekick tho.
Allan Parkington - 25 Nov 2007 12:29 GMT
> We've already seen those union goons get work choices binned, even when
> hordes of them like in the WA mining industry want to see them retained
> because they have delivered much higher than otherwise wages and
> conditions.
Rudd has already said that workers earning over 100k won't be affected,
which is practically everyone who works up North. Even the local chicken
treat manager in Karratha is on 120k..
Rod Speed - 25 Nov 2007 20:33 GMT
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> We've already seen those union goons get work choices binned, even when hordes of them like in the WA mining industry
>> want to see them retained because they have delivered much higher than otherwise wages and conditions.
> Rudd has already said that workers earning over 100k won't be affected,
He's also said that AWAa will be binned. So they will have
to change over to common law contracts at least, stupid.
> which is practically everyone who works up North.
Pig ignorant lie.
> Even the local chicken treat manager in Karratha is on 120k..
Irrelevant to whether AWAs will be binned, regardless
of whether those on AWAs want them or not.
There might just a be a reason why WA was the only state to see labor lose a seat and gain none.
Spokes - 27 Nov 2007 13:39 GMT
On Nov 25, 11:29 pm, "Allan Parkington"
<allanparking...@team.telstra.com> wrote:
> > We've already seen those union goons get work choices binned, even when
> > hordes of them like in the WA mining industry want to see them retained
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> which is practically everyone who works up North. Even the local chicken
> treat manager in Karratha is on 120k..
One needs a wage like that to afford to live in that area. I lived
there for 5 years in the early 80s and I couldn't believe the high
prices atrributed to "freight".