> From
> http://www.zdnet.com.au/blogs/upwardlymobile/soa/CDMA-Enough-of-the-bad-language
/0,2000066194,339285311,00.htm
> The day of reckoning finally arrived for CDMA
And telstra got raped with a telephone pole, as it should have been LONG ago.
> -- and was then postponed, leaving everyone with any strong feeling on the subject a nice window of three months to
> once again enjoy the semantic back-and-forth the closure provokes.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> There's been lots of interesting language being bandied about in the last couple of days over CDMA and its antecedent.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> Take this for example, from Broadband Minister and Adrian Mole lookalike Stephen Conroy:
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> "I want to finish today by thanking Telstra on their co-operation in this matter. Telstra should be congratulated for
> investing extensively in its Next G network, which has received world recognition.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> I appreciate the resources and commitment Telstra
> has brought to implementing its new national network."
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> And from Telstra's head of public policy and Raymond Burr lookalike Phil Burgess:
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> "We welcome the government's decisive action on this important transition in the nation's telecommunications future.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> We are also pleased that the Minister has provided clear direction to Telstra and to consumers about how to proceed to
> make sure this transition is completed:
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> Something in this sound odd to you?
Yep, furious arse licking always does.
> All the hearts and flowers, sticky-mouthed kisses and clammy handholding from Telstra and the government? It's all a
> bit Lady and the Tramp, the two parties at either end of that strand of spaghetti.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> This isn't the rough and tumble we're used to from Telstra when a decision doesn't go its way. Could the grumpy telco
> be mellowing out? Unlikely, but Conroy can dream.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> The other titbit that produced much linguistic frothing at the mouth,
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> not least on ZDNet.com.au's talkback, was this Conroy classic:
> "Telstra can only switch off the CDMA network when I consider that its replacement provides equivalent coverage and
> equivalent retail
> services. I have reached a decision that I am not in a position to
> declare equivalence between the Next G network and the CDMA networks,
> and therefore the closure of the CDMA network will be postponed."
> Depending on what side of the fence you're on, that translates as "Next G has the same or better coverage as CDMA,
> there's just a few retail issues to be ironed out,"
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> or "The coverage may be the same, but there's enough else wrong to warrant a delay to the CDMA closure".
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> I presume where you stand on that issue is a question of how you find your Next G coverage and so I'll leave it to
> bush users to pick the winning statement.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> My favourite use of language so far on the CDMA debate was in a press release from the telco itself, reminding its
> customers to double check they're on Next G.
> How exactly should they do that? We'll quote directly from Telstra on this one:
> When the phone is on, check the front screen and see if it says
> 'CDMA'. If it does, then you are using the old CDMA network.
> No laughing at the back.
> It would be churlish of me to suggest this is stating the sodding
> obvious (even though it is) but think about it for a second. There
> are, I'm guessing, three main groups of CDMA users out there, each
> with distinctly different reactions to the impending network closure.
> * The people who have heard Telstra's messages about the closure,
> know that time is running out -- acts of Conroy excepted -- and have
> already made the switch. Maybe they've grumbled a bit about having to shell out for a new mobile but they're now
> confirmed Next G
> customers. These guys are probably the type that find the 'does your phone say CDMA? Then you're using CDMA' message
> risible.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
> * Those who have heard Telstra's messages about the closure, know that time is running out -- acts of Conroy
> excepted -- and have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> either. They may well find the 'does your phone say CDMA?' message
> handy. Of course, they're so cut off, they're never going to see it anyway.
Wota f.cking w.nker...
cornedbeef007-groups@yahoo.com.au - 24 Jan 2008 04:52 GMT
> Wota f.cking w.nker...
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Wota f.cking w.nker
Got any sensible to say?? Stuck for words, hmmm?