Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Spam

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J. Veil - 08 Jun 2008 02:17 GMT
Have I been leading a sheltered live?
Have had a mobile now for four years and until the last few weeks NEVER had
any spam.
All of a sudden I got a person to person call from someone wanting to sell
me a different provider and a recorded message insisting on the virtues of
gambling.

Is mobile spamming new?
Can one take worthwhile actions to report this type of pest?

Interested to hear your opinions,

John
Rod Speed - 08 Jun 2008 04:05 GMT
> Have I been leading a sheltered live?

Yes. Life anyway.

> Have had a mobile now for four years

Nothing like 'living' on the bleeding edge technology wise.

> and until the last few weeks NEVER had any spam.

I've never ever had any, and I've had mobiles for a hell of a lot longer than 4 years.

> All of a sudden I got a person to person call from someone wanting to sell me a different provider and a recorded
> message insisting on the virtues of gambling.

> Is mobile spamming new?

Nope. Just less common because it costs spammers more.

> Can one take worthwhile actions to report this type of pest?

Nope. Not unless you have signed up for the do not call register and the
operations that call anyway are local as opposed to outside the country.

> Interested to hear your opinions,

I never ever have any of those. They're like arseholes.
Kwyjibo - 08 Jun 2008 05:08 GMT
>> Have I been leading a sheltered live?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I've never ever had any, and I've had mobiles for a hell of a lot longer
> than 4 years.

That's cos you're on the Pov register. No point trying to sell stuff to
people who have no money.

>> All of a sudden I got a person to person call from someone wanting to
>> sell me a different provider and a recorded message insisting on the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Nope. Just less common because it costs spammers more.

Though some overseas based VoIP operations are making it a lot more viable.

>> Can one take worthwhile actions to report this type of pest?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I never ever have any of those.

LOL.

> They're like arseholes.

In your case - definitely. (full of sh.t)

Signature

Kwyj.

Rod Speed - 08 Jun 2008 05:50 GMT
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>> Have I been leading a sheltered live?

>> Yes. Life anyway.

>>> Have had a mobile now for four years

>> Nothing like 'living' on the bleeding edge technology wise.

>>> and until the last few weeks NEVER had any spam.

>> I've never ever had any, and I've had mobiles for a hell of a lot longer than 4 years.

> That's cos you're on the Pov register.

Its the pov register, stupid.

> No point trying to sell stuff to people who have no money.

How odd that I get so much on the landline, fuckwit.

>>> All of a sudden I got a person to person call from someone wanting to sell me a different provider and a recorded
>>> message insisting on the virtues of gambling.

>>> Is mobile spamming new?

>> Nope. Just less common because it costs spammers more.

> Though some overseas based VoIP operations are making it a lot more viable.

Yep.

>>> Can one take worthwhile actions to report this type of pest?

>> Nope. Not unless you have signed up for the do not call register and the operations that call anyway are local as
>> opposed to outside the country.

>>> Interested to hear your opinions,

>> I never ever have any of those.

> LOL.

This is no laughing matter, fuckwit.

>> They're like arseholes.

> In your case - definitely. (full of sh.t)

Any 2 year old could leave that for dead.

Get one to help you before posting again, if anyone is actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one.
Horry - 08 Jun 2008 05:28 GMT
>> Interested to hear your opinions,
>
> I never ever have any of those. They're like arseholes.

You've never had an arsehole?
Rod Speed - 08 Jun 2008 05:51 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote

>>> Interested to hear your opinions,

>> I never ever have any of those. They're like arseholes.

> You've never had an arsehole?

Never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything like that.
Horry - 08 Jun 2008 06:30 GMT
>> Rod Speed wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything like that.

You've never ever had anything like an arsehole?
will_s - 08 Jun 2008 06:44 GMT
>> Rod Speed wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything like that.

"never had an opinion"

opinions are like arseholes

so lets then replace opinion with arsehole

"never had an arsehole"

well I agree  with Rod, nothing remotely resembling that but rather 100%
spot on

I guess by not having an arsehole that would explain the sh.t that flows
from your mouth ?
Bob Bain - 09 Jun 2008 01:25 GMT
>> Interested to hear your opinions,

>I never ever have any of those. They're like arseholes.

I believe you've had lot's of these over the years

   (opinions that is).

You are no doubt aware that this is National E-Security Awareness
week as announced by Senator Conroy...

http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2008/minister_launches_nat
ional_e-security_awareness_week


http://www.staysmartonline.gov.au/

Articles around such as the one here:-

http://www.smartofficenews.com.au/Technology/Internet/C6S4B4F3

The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy,
Senator Stephen Conroy, has turned himself into an online superhero in
a bid to kill off spam, malware, hacking and other online abuse.

Partnering with major Australian and international companies, peak
bodies and community groups, the federal government has launched
National E-security Awareness Week, with the aim being to highlight
the simple steps Australians should take to stay smart online.

==============================

You're not in the Queen's Birthday honours Rod.

Your contribution to cyberspace hasn't been acknowledged.

John Howard made it !
Snapper - 09 Jun 2008 02:34 GMT
J. Veil wrote...

> Is mobile spamming new?
> Can one take worthwhile actions to report this type of pest?

It seems that about all you can do is to prevent the likes of what happened to
me last week when I got an unsolicited call and a pre-recorded message telling
me how I "won" a "free" trial for a trivial pursuit SMS game.

I quickly rang Telstra and advised them that under no circumstances will I be
responsible for any such costs that may appear on any future phone bills. The
guy them placed a bar on our phones receiving "premium" SMSes.

As for receiving normal ones that are adverts, well, I dunno what you can do
about that, other than to perhaps get a new phone number and don't give it out
to anyone other than trusted family and friends.

I've given up on releasing this info when signing up for stuff. In fact, when a
shop that I buy something from asks me for personal details I decline. Some say
it's store "policy" to take your details. I say to them that it's my policy not
to. All they require from me is the wherewithall to conclude the transaction
(money). And all I require from them is the product that I'm purchasing and a
tax invoice.

If they insist then I say to them, well, I can go and buy this product from
somewhere else or you can conclude the sale without the info. Your choice.

Sometimes they get narky, sometimes they don't.
J. Veil - 09 Jun 2008 04:44 GMT
"Snapper"  wrote >
> It seems that about all you can do is to prevent the likes of what
> happened to
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Sometimes they get narky, sometimes they don't.
=================================================

Thank you Snapper, for being the only one replying to my original
question...Very helpfull.

It is truly refreshing to find at least one person on this news group, that
is not moronic and foul mouthed or has the fruitless need to feed same.

Thank you again,

John
Horry - 09 Jun 2008 12:01 GMT
> "Snapper"  wrote >
>> It seems that about all you can do is to prevent the likes of what
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Thank you again,

Seconded.  I've never consciously noticed it before, but Snapper's
posts ARE truly refreshing.
Michael - 09 Jun 2008 07:54 GMT
> J. Veil wrote...
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> be
> responsible for any such costs that may appear on any future phone bills.

What does that have to do with Telstra? Its your phone, not theirs

> If they insist then I say to them, well, I can go and buy this product
> from
> somewhere else or you can conclude the sale without the info. Your choice.

What a tool
Horry - 09 Jun 2008 12:05 GMT
>> J. Veil wrote...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> What a tool

Agreed.  Far either just to give them Micheal J Ellis' details.  They
rarely ask for ID unless it's required by law.
Kwyjibo - 09 Jun 2008 13:08 GMT
> Agreed.  Far either just to give them Micheal J Ellis' details.  They
> rarely ask for ID unless it's required by law.

Far either? Do you have a lisp?

Signature

Kwyj.

Horry - 09 Jun 2008 13:16 GMT
>> Agreed.  Far either just to give them Micheal J Ellis' details.  They
>> rarely ask for ID unless it's required by law.
>>
> Far either? Do you have a lisp?

I'm a Southerner.
Snapper - 10 Jun 2008 04:36 GMT
Michael wrote...

> > I quickly rang Telstra and advised them that under no circumstances will I
> > be responsible for any such costs that may appear on any future phone bills.
>
> What does that have to do with Telstra? Its your phone, not theirs

Everything. Telstra is the one that issues the bills. I wanted to make it clear
that if such charges appeared on my bill that I would not be paying them. The
guy accomodated me by placing the bar on the service.

It's called pro-active consumerism.

> > If they insist then I say to them, well, I can go and buy this product
> > from somewhere else or you can conclude the sale without the info. Your choice.

> What a tool

Well, fuckwit, do you give all your details out to whoever you buy stuff from?
If so, good luck to you. The rest of us would like to ensure some privacy in
this ever increasingly privacy-less world...
Michael - 11 Jun 2008 22:48 GMT
> Michael wrote...
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> It's called pro-active consumerism.

No, its called "w.nk w.nk w.nk" You, sir, are a w.nker

>> > If they insist then I say to them, well, I can go and buy this product
>> > from somewhere else or you can conclude the sale without the info. Your
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Well, fuckwit, do you give all your details out to whoever you buy stuff
> from?

Sure, why not? I dont have a tinfoil hat either, are they the latest
fashion?

> If so, good luck to you. The rest of us would like to ensure some privacy
> in
> this ever increasingly privacy-less world...

Stop being a big girls blouse.
Horry - 12 Jun 2008 01:40 GMT
>> Michael wrote...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Sure, why not? I dont have a tinfoil hat either, are they the latest
> fashion?

What's the relevance of tinfoil hats?

He just hates marketing crap, and giving your details out to businesses is
a great way to ensure you receive marketing crap.
Kwyjibo - 12 Jun 2008 14:23 GMT
>>> Michael wrote...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> What's the relevance of tinfoil hats?

They provide 'splashback' protection for Mr Ellis while he carries out the
duties of his chosen vocation.

Signature

Kwyj.

Snapper - 15 Jun 2008 11:37 GMT
Horry wrote...

> What's the relevance of tinfoil hats?

He's grasping at, well, tinfoil hats...

> He just hates marketing crap, and giving your details out to businesses is
> a great way to ensure you receive marketing crap.

Perazkly.

To top it off we're regularly getting faxes from mobs selling holidays, winery
tours and so on.

I think that I may know the culprit who "onsold" our fax number as it isn't
listed. It's a faxstream duet service with distinctive ring on the home phone
line.

What annoys me is that machine, a Brother MFC, gets used occasionally for
printing, more for scanning and sending faxes. So, most of the ink in the
picolitre sized ink tanks gets wasted on these faxes. And there's no return
number to call them to tell 'em to f.ck off, just the advertiser.

If I had THEIR fax number a few solid black pages would be on their way, every
day...
Rod Speed - 15 Jun 2008 19:03 GMT
> Horry wrote

>> What's the relevance of tinfoil hats?

> He's grasping at, well, tinfoil hats...

>> He just hates marketing crap, and giving your details out to
>> businesses is a great way to ensure you receive marketing crap.

> Perazkly.

> To top it off we're regularly getting faxes from mobs selling holidays, winery tours and so on.

> I think that I may know the culprit who "onsold" our fax number as it
> isn't listed. It's a faxstream duet service with distinctive ring on
> the home phone line.

> What annoys me is that machine, a Brother MFC, gets used occasionally
> for printing, more for scanning and sending faxes. So, most of the
> ink in the picolitre sized ink tanks gets wasted on these faxes. And
> there's no return number to call them to tell 'em to f.ck off, just
> the advertiser.

> If I had THEIR fax number a few solid black pages would be on their
> way, every day...

Try putting a caller ID displaying phone on the line to see if you can get the number that way.
Snapper - 16 Jun 2008 01:48 GMT
Rod Speed wrote...

> Try putting a caller ID displaying phone on the line to see if you can get the number that way.

I have. They all come up as "private caller", with the occasional "overseas' on
the CLID.
Rod Speed - 16 Jun 2008 02:12 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote

>> Try putting a caller ID displaying phone on the
>> line to see if you can get the number that way.

> I have. They all come up as "private caller", with the occasional "overseas' on the CLID.

Then unless you have foip (fax over voip), it wouldnt be much use to you anyway.

The better faxes can reject fax calls that dont present their caller ID,
or just use the PC to receive faxes, so you dont waste ink on the spam.

It should even be possible to have the PC recieve only the faxes that
dont present their Caller ID.
Snapper - 16 Jun 2008 22:35 GMT
Rod Speed wrote...

> The better faxes can reject fax calls that dont present their caller ID,

That would be a handy feature. I have a Brother MFC, but it's the cheaper model,
bought two years ago. Still, I'll check its settings out, though I don't recall
seeing anything like that.

> or just use the PC to receive faxes, so you dont waste ink on the spam.

Another option but that requires a fax modem and a PC to be running all the
time. which I have neither of.

Probably the easiest option is to see if Telstra will change the faxstream
number. Of course whoever gets my number in the reallocation process may be
stuck with fax screeching when a call comes in...
Rod Speed - 16 Jun 2008 23:27 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote

>> The better faxes can reject fax calls that dont present their caller ID,

> That would be a handy feature. I have a Brother MFC, but it's
> the cheaper model, bought two years ago. Still, I'll check its
> settings out, though I don't recall seeing anything like that.

>> or just use the PC to receive faxes, so you dont waste ink on the spam.

> Another option but that requires a fax modem

Your dialup modem should be able to do that fine. Presumably
you still have one of those for when the broadband is down etc.
They cost peanuts now even if you dont.

> and a PC to be running all the time.

Yeah, tho I always have 2 on all the time.

> which I have neither of.

> Probably the easiest option is to see if Telstra will change the faxstream number.

Yeah, they certainly will. Presumably there is a small charge for that.

> Of course whoever gets my number in the reallocation process
> may be stuck with fax screeching when a call comes in...

They dont reallocate it immediately and by then the spammer
may well have taken it of the list when it never answers.

Or just leave the fax off and only turn it on when you expect an incoming fax. Thats what I do, I get so few now.
Michael - 20 Jun 2008 02:28 GMT
>> Probably the easiest option is to see if Telstra will change the
>> faxstream number.
>
> Yeah, they certainly will. Presumably there is a small charge for that.

not for unwelcome calls
Michael - 20 Jun 2008 02:27 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote...
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> be
> stuck with fax screeching when a call comes in...

6 mth quarantine period applies, and most of the fax spammers will take your
number off the list afterr they get the disconnected message a few times
brian w edginton - 16 Jun 2008 02:35 GMT
>Rod Speed wrote...
>
>> Try putting a caller ID displaying phone on the line to see if you can get the number that way.
>
>I have. They all come up as "private caller", with the occasional "overseas' on
>the CLID.

My "betting voucher" call in Lismore came from an anonymous number.
Landlord reckons his in Grafton came from an 08 number......???

-----------------------------------------------

Death is Nature's way of telling you you aren't
needed, any more.
Snapper - 16 Jun 2008 22:35 GMT
brian w edginton wrote...

> My "betting voucher" call in Lismore came from an anonymous number.
> Landlord reckons his in Grafton came from an 08 number......???

I've posted the two numbers of the trivial contest and the betting mob here in
other messages. One, I think, was from QLD, the other from NSW.

I now will ignore all incoming calls that originate from out of state as I know
no-one who lives interstate who has my mobile. If it comes via a private caller,
then I need to decide, as I get calls from work that are unlisted numbers.
Rod Speed - 16 Jun 2008 23:30 GMT
> brian w edginton wrote

>> My "betting voucher" call in Lismore came from an anonymous number.
>> Landlord reckons his in Grafton came from an 08 number......???

> I've posted the two numbers of the trivial contest and the betting mob here
> in other messages. One, I think, was from QLD, the other from NSW.

> I now will ignore all incoming calls that originate from out of state
> as I know no-one who lives interstate who has my mobile. If it comes
> via a private caller, then I need to decide, as I get calls from work
> that are unlisted numbers.

And you can get calls from operations like the cops or the hospital etc
that dont show their caller ID. It would be a real problem if she who
must be obeyed etc ended up in a car crash etc and couldnt call you.
Snapper - 17 Jun 2008 22:09 GMT
Rod Speed wrote...

> And you can get calls from operations like the cops or the hospital etc
> that dont show their caller ID. It would be a real problem if she who
> must be obeyed etc ended up in a car crash etc and couldnt call you.

If whoever is calling is "private number" and they bother to leave a message
we'll pick up if they're legit callers. It doesn't happen that much anyway (that
call centres actually leave messages).

What sh.ts me are those that do call, then place YOU on hold saying that their
operators are all busy....

That's what ended up prompting us to ignore the private callers.

As for emergency services one would hope that if they got the answering machine
that they'd leave a message.

Of course if it's that bad then the police generally come around. It's already
happened once...
Rod Speed - 17 Jun 2008 23:38 GMT
> Rod Speed wrote

>> And you can get calls from operations like the cops or the hospital etc
>> that dont show their caller ID. It would be a real problem if she who
>> must be obeyed etc ended up in a car crash etc and couldnt call you.

> If whoever is calling is "private number" and they bother to leave
> a message we'll pick up if they're legit callers. It doesn't happen
> that much anyway (that call centres actually leave messages).

> What sh.ts me are those that do call, then place YOU
> on hold saying that their operators are all busy....

> That's what ended up prompting us to ignore the private callers.

> As for emergency services one would hope that if they
> got the answering machine that they'd leave a message.

Dunno, havent tried that myself.

> Of course if it's that bad then the police generally come around.

Sure, but generally you'd prefer the quicker phone call. And the hospital
presumably doenst bother to visit in person if the message doesnt get thru.

> It's already happened once...

I've mostly got phone calls from the cops. Not always tho.
Michael - 20 Jun 2008 02:28 GMT
>> It's already happened once...
>
> I've mostly got phone calls from the cops. Not always tho.

Your complaint file is growing, I see
Rod Speed - 20 Jun 2008 03:48 GMT
>>> It's already happened once...

>> I've mostly got phone calls from the cops. Not always tho.

> Your complaint file is growing, I see

Obvious lie, you've clearly wanked yourself blind.

The most recent time they called me was to give me
a reference number for a crime I reported to them.

The time before that, they rang me to tell me that a couple of stupid
kids had been roaming the neighbourhood with a wheelbarrow, quite
literally, one night and loading it from people's cars, to ask me to come
down to the copshop and pickup my stuff they had got from my car.
Michael - 22 Jun 2008 04:19 GMT
>>>> It's already happened once...
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> literally, one night and loading it from people's cars, to ask me to come
> down to the copshop and pickup my stuff they had got from my car.

Why would they steal sh.t from your car?
Rod Speed - 22 Jun 2008 04:45 GMT
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>> It's already happened once...

>>>> I've mostly got phone calls from the cops. Not always tho.

>>> Your complaint file is growing, I see

>> Obvious lie, you've clearly wanked yourself blind.

>> The most recent time they called me was to give me
>> a reference number for a crime I reported to them.

>> The time before that, they rang me to tell me that a couple of stupid
>> kids had been roaming the neighbourhood with a wheelbarrow, quite
>> literally, one night and loading it from people's cars, to ask me to come down to the copshop and pickup my stuff
>> they had got from my car.

> Why would they steal sh.t from your car?

Same reason they were stupid enough to 'think' that they
would get away with wheeling a wheelbarrow around the
streets filling it from every car they could get into.

Those two aint exactly what you might call rocket scientist material.

The problem is between their ears, trivially measurably.
Michael - 20 Jun 2008 02:27 GMT
> To top it off we're regularly getting faxes from mobs selling holidays,
> winery
> tours and so on.

Yeah I get that sh.t on my work fax now.

> I think that I may know the culprit who "onsold" our fax number as it
> isn't
> listed. It's a faxstream duet service with distinctive ring on the home
> phone
> line.

Mine isnt listed either.
Paul Day - 12 Jun 2008 04:39 GMT
> > Well, fuckwit, do you give all your details out to whoever you buy stuff
> > from?
>
> Sure, why not?

Becuase you might value your privacy?

PD

Signature

Paul Day

Michael - 09 Jun 2008 07:53 GMT
> Have I been leading a sheltered live?

Yes

> All of a sudden I got a person to person call from someone wanting to sell
> me a different provider and a recorded message insisting on the virtues of
> gambling.
>
> Is mobile spamming new?

Spam is e-mail. You didn't get spam

> Can one take worthwhile actions to report this type of pest?

Report? To whom? and about what?

Anyone has always been free to call your mobile anytime they like

> Interested to hear your opinions,
>
> John
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.