> I understand what everyone's saying in terms of "this is how it's supposed
> to work", but I'm not sure that it SHOULD work this way.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Amazes me that all this work went into Bluetooth and something this simple
> can't be done. Talk about over-engineering.
I don't think that the Bluetooth committee has any say in the manner in
which Microsoft implements Media Player.
>> That's how it's supposed to work, get used to it..:-)

Signature
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
> I understand what everyone's saying in terms of "this is how it's supposed
> to work", but I'm not sure that it SHOULD work this way.
Compiler tools can be had for free. Feel free to exercise your right to
create the code that does it the way you'd like.
> I mean, if Bluetooth is supposed to simply provide a headset without wires,
> then it should behave the same way.
That's not all it does. A headset is just an audio route for mic/speakers.
A Bt headset can do quite a lot more. I'd daresay those with intelligent Bt
headsets would greatly resent have their functionality limited to that of a
mere analog headset.
> When I plug in my headset into my
> laptop, the speakers cut out (via physical cutoff) and I listen through the
> headphones. When I pull them out, the speakers come right back on.
> Invisible to the software because it's all happening via the hardware.
That's because it's NOT SOFTWARE. When you use an analog headset jack
you're physically breaking the connection the laptop makes with the
speakers.
> I see no reason why a bluetooth headset shouldn't be able to work this way.
I specifically would NOT want it to work that way. I prefer leaving
computer sounds from the computer's speakers. I do not want the various
bings, bleeps and other noises a PC is likely to make coming out to my
headset. That's one of the VERY nice things about windows is it's ability
to handle system sounds independently of other audio outputs.
> It seems to me that what is needed is a PC sound mixer which supports and
> integrates multiple sources and allows you to switch between them without
> the software (reading from the "wave" mixer source) getting screwed up just
> because you switched listening modes.
See earlier compiler comment. Go forth and code.
Did you try the J.River product I suggested? Did it work?
> Amazes me that all this work went into Bluetooth and something this simple
> can't be done. Talk about over-engineering.
It's hardly over-engineered simply because it doesn't do the thing YOU want.