The moderation would be of the losest level, since news.admin can
harbor a broad variety of discussions. (One could argue that this, in
itself is a problem, but I won't). I simply want to keep the
conversation civilized.
If no one else, I will volenteer to moderate. Note this is a call
for discussion. If there is sufficient interest, I'll call for votes.
Robert M. - 10 Apr 2004 16:43 GMT
In article <16c18aca.0404100707.7fa44193@posting.google.com>,
Australia_Boy_Scout@onestopbox.com (BOXMAN is a very nice BOXMAN who
gos to Church every sunday) wrote:
> The moderation would be of the losest level, since news.admin can
> harbor a broad variety of discussions. (One could argue that this, in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If no one else, I will volenteer to moderate. Note this is a call
> for discussion. If there is sufficient interest, I'll call for votes.
Wait for Feb 14, and then valenteer.
Frank - 10 Apr 2004 17:22 GMT
Start moderating.
> The moderation would be of the losest level, since news.admin can
> harbor a broad variety of discussions. (One could argue that this, in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If no one else, I will volenteer to moderate. Note this is a call
> for discussion. If there is sufficient interest, I'll call for votes.
Joseph - 11 Apr 2004 06:18 GMT
>The moderation would be of the losest level, since news.admin can
>harbor a broad variety of discussions. (One could argue that this, in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>If no one else, I will volenteer to moderate. Note this is a call
>for discussion. If there is sufficient interest, I'll call for votes.
If you want a moderated group you'll have to creat a brand new group.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
Lawrence Glasser - 11 Apr 2004 06:24 GMT
> >The moderation would be of the losest level, since news.admin can
> >harbor a broad variety of discussions. (One could argue that this, in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> If you want a moderated group you'll have to creat a brand new group.
The OP (aka BOXMAN) is one of the primary reasons that moderation has
been suggested.
Please don't feed him.
Larry
Larry W4CSC - 24 Apr 2004 19:46 GMT
> The OP (aka BOXMAN) is one of the primary reasons that moderation has
> been suggested.
I'd bet Verizon would PAY to moderate this newsgroup....(c;
BOXMAN SPAM COP - 24 Apr 2004 23:59 GMT
>
> > The OP (aka Alan P aka jeff bond) is one of the primary reasons that
> > moderation has
> > been suggested.
>
> I'd bet Verizon would PAY to moderate this newsgroup....(c;
BOXMAN SPAM COP
i emailed this to verizon's ceo