> I don't think that anyone offers this any more.
AFAIK, you're correct.
> The second phone was identified in the SBMS switch and when an incoming call
> happened both phones would ring. First one to answer got the call.
The service, which ran $19.99/month, was called "Flexphone" by SBMS.
It was really designed to allow someone with a car-mounted phone to
also take calls on a handheld when out of the car. When the
conversion to digital came along, flexphone went away, since it lost
it's "raison d'etre".
> No, you could not transfer the call to the other phone and yes, the both phones
> could mke calls at the same time.
But the two phones couldn't call each other, IIRC, since by calling
"yourself" the call would go right to voicemail.
> My wife and I had this setup for a number of years. Only the primary phone on
> the account could roam and when it was roaming the other one couldn't receive
> any calls, only make them.
I've got to hand it to you, John- you solved the mystery of the ages-
you figured out how to give your wife the safety and security of
wireless, yet render her incapable of calling you! Kudos! ;-)
> We got where we needed to both be able to roam so canceled that plan.
I always wondered about the roaming restriction. I suspect since
other carriers didn't support flexing, they could only authenticate
one ESN with a given number?
While it's sad that flexphone went away, the advent of cheap family
plans makes the limitations of flexphone less desirable. Flexing can
be pretty much simulated with a family plan and conditional call
forwarding, without the roaming limitations or inability to call each
other.
John S. - 29 Jun 2004 12:54 GMT
>But the two phones couldn't call each other, IIRC, since by calling
>"yourself" the call would go right to voicemail.
This is correct, the the two phones couldn't call each other, a limitation that
we also had to do away with as time passed.
>I've got to hand it to you, John- you solved the mystery of the ages-
>you figured out how to give your wife the safety and security of
>wireless, yet render her incapable of calling you! Kudos! ;-)
I sometimes wish that this was still the case!!! :-)
--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net