Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / General / General Topics / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Razr is now 49.99 from Amazon.com

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
talksense - 20 May 2005 17:00 GMT
Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
anyone is interested, here is the link:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search/104-6553813-3087105?mode=wirel
ess-phones&keyword=Motorola+V3&tag=mobileisgood-20

Joseph - 20 May 2005 23:44 GMT
>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
>anyone is interested, here is the link:
>
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search/104-6553813-3087105?mode=wirel
ess-phones&keyword=Motorola+V3&tag=mobileisgood-20

And Razr and other premium phones such as Nokia 6230i and others are
free with a two year contract in Europe from such places as Car Phone
Warehouse and Phonehouse.  No pesky rebates to deal with either.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
         
Richard Colton - 21 May 2005 00:33 GMT
>>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
>>anyone is interested, here is the link:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> free with a two year contract in Europe from such places as Car Phone
> Warehouse and Phonehouse.  No pesky rebates to deal with either.

True, but in the UK, those two are both free on one year contracts (and with
additional cashback in some cases).

Signature

<<<  Unlock Your Phone's Potential  >>>
<<<       www.uselessinfo.org.uk       >>>
<<<    www.thephonelocker.co.uk    >>>
<<<      www.gsm-solutions.co.uk     >>>

Rock - 21 May 2005 03:11 GMT
> >>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
> >>anyone is interested, here is the link:

From what I have heard so far it is not all that good of a phone.
JC - 21 May 2005 07:58 GMT
>> >>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
>> >>anyone is interested, here is the link:
>>
>From what I have heard so far it is not all that good of a phone.

I would suggest that you have heard wrong then!!!

Granted, it's not got all of the bells and whistles that some of its
competitors have, but it is an excellent phone!!
Signature


Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply

Rock - 21 May 2005 10:30 GMT
news:jups81dtahd109r5rb3h90chphnlhp2q68@4ax.com...

> >> >>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
> >> >>anyone is interested, here is the link:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Granted, it's not got all of the bells and whistles that some of its
> competitors have, but it is an excellent phone!!

I don't care about the bells and whistles at all. The reception is not where
it should be.
Richard Colton - 21 May 2005 11:26 GMT
> news:jups81dtahd109r5rb3h90chphnlhp2q68@4ax.com...
>> >> > On Fri, 20 May 2005 11:00:41 -0500, "talksense"
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> where
> it should be.

Hang on a minute.  In your last post you said "I've heard", and now you're
stating that you find the reception to be not that good.  Now either you
have the phone or you don't.  If you don't, then you're not really in a
position to comment.

As for me, I find the V3 no worse than any other phone, and better than most
for reception.

Signature

<<<  Unlock Your Phone's Potential  >>>
<<<       www.uselessinfo.org.uk       >>>
<<<    www.thephonelocker.co.uk    >>>
<<<      www.gsm-solutions.co.uk     >>>

Geri - 21 May 2005 13:51 GMT
> As for me, I find the V3 no worse than any other phone, and better than most for reception.

I got one of these free from O2 two days after they were released. It has good and bad points. Best
things are style and size worst is slow response to keypresses and glitchy firmware. Lack of decent
memory space/card slot and no video taking capability are a pain so is no IRDA.  It is more robust
than it looks, mine  having been used in a buiolding site environment for the last 5 months and
still going strong. The software has crashed about a dozen times.
Isaiah Beard - 23 May 2005 04:11 GMT
> Lack of decent memory
> space/card slot and no video taking capability are a pain so is no
> IRDA.  

What are you using IRDA for?  it's an antiquated format, barely does
56k, and is supplanted by bluetooth.

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

PC Medic - 25 May 2005 11:25 GMT
>> Lack of decent memory space/card slot and no video taking capability are
>> a pain so is no IRDA.
>
> What are you using IRDA for?  it's an antiquated format, barely does 56k,
> and is supplanted by bluetooth.

your info is what is antiquated, IrDA supports up to 4Mb rates
Isaiah Beard - 26 May 2005 04:28 GMT
>>>Lack of decent memory space/card slot and no video taking capability are
>>>a pain so is no IRDA.
>>
>>What are you using IRDA for?  it's an antiquated format, barely does 56k,
>>and is supplanted by bluetooth.

> your info is what is antiquated, IrDA supports up to 4Mb rates

If you're going to attack someone's posts, it helps if you have a
mastery of vocabulary in addition to correct information.

Speeds for IrDA v. 1.0, which is what most phones with IrDA conform to,
range from 2400 to 115200 kbps.

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

nospam@ptd.net - 23 May 2005 15:52 GMT
>> As for me, I find the V3 no worse than any other phone, and better than most for reception.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>than it looks, mine  having been used in a buiolding site environment for the last 5 months and
>still going strong. The software has crashed about a dozen times.

The video is actually there, it requires a hack to get it working
though.  I just did my first SEEM edit but I don't know if I want to
get into the FLEX stuff.

Definitely better than most for reception,  I tried out a v400 that
was useless.
Steven de Mena - 24 May 2005 00:47 GMT
> news:jups81dtahd109r5rb3h90chphnlhp2q68@4ax.com...
>> >> > On Fri, 20 May 2005 11:00:41 -0500, "talksense"
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> where
> it should be.

It's rated pretty high for reception.
CJD - 21 May 2005 17:54 GMT
> >> >>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
> >> >>anyone is interested, here is the link:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Granted, it's not got all of the bells and whistles that some of its
> competitors have, but it is an excellent phone!!

It's a good phone ya, but it is basically just a V600 in a more nice housing
with a very high price tag, now if we were talking of the V635, then we are
talking excellent phone!
talksense - 23 May 2005 16:03 GMT
Mor than likely you heard from people who haven't used the phone. When it
comes to working as a PHONE, very few phones can compare to Razr.

Imran
http://www.mobileisgood.com

> > >>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
> > >>anyone is interested, here is the link:
> >
> From what I have heard so far it is not all that good of a phone.
Steven de Mena - 24 May 2005 00:47 GMT
>> >>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only.
>> >>If
>> >>anyone is interested, here is the link:
>>
> From what I have heard so far it is not all that good of a phone.

You obviously haven't heard much then.
Steven de Mena - 24 May 2005 00:46 GMT
>>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
>>anyone is interested, here is the link:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> free with a two year contract in Europe from such places as Car Phone
> Warehouse and Phonehouse.  No pesky rebates to deal with either.

And your point is?....
Joseph - 24 May 2005 06:13 GMT
>>>Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
>>>anyone is interested, here is the link:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>And your point is?....

My point is that in Europe these premium phones are free on contract.
In the US the best deals you're still paying $50 up front.  Free is
generally better than not free!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
         
Rock - 24 May 2005 21:22 GMT
>>>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search/104-6553813-3087105?mode=wirel
ess-phones&keyword=Motorola+V3&tag=mobileisgood-20

> >>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> generally better than not free!
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

   Well many people don't care if they get ripped off so they can have the
latest designer phone on the block. Let's see, a few months ago fools were
paying nearly $500 and now they are down to $49. What a deal! I tried two
different ones, the reception was not nearly as good as my three year old
Nokia. Hey maybe they were bad ones huh?
Capn - 24 May 2005 22:04 GMT
On that note, why the hell is is cheaper to purchase gsm phones in europe?
Is it simply that the coverage is more vast or another reason?

Capt.

>>>>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search/104-6553813-3087105?mod
> e=wireless-phones&keyword=Motorola+V3&tag=mobileisgood-20
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> different ones, the reception was not nearly as good as my three year old
> Nokia. Hey maybe they were bad ones huh?
Soruk - 24 May 2005 23:02 GMT
>On that note, why the hell is is cheaper to purchase gsm phones in europe?
>Is it simply that the coverage is more vast or another reason?

Economies of scale?  We use nothing but GSM here.

>Capt.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> different ones, the reception was not nearly as good as my three year old
>> Nokia. Hey maybe they were bad ones huh?

Signature

-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
  Eridani Star System

  MailStripper - "The easy spam filter."
  http://mailstripper.eridani.co.uk/

Rock - 25 May 2005 02:24 GMT
> On that note, why the hell is is cheaper to purchase gsm phones in europe?
> Is it simply that the coverage is more vast or another reason?
>
> Capt.

Maybe because some of us (not me)Americans are gullible dumb a.ses willing
to spend a fortune to have the latest gadget phone at any price so they can
be cool. A reasonable person would wait a few months and get it for next to
nothing.
Joseph - 25 May 2005 03:01 GMT
>On that note, why the hell is is cheaper to purchase gsm phones in europe?
>Is it simply that the coverage is more vast or another reason?

They aren't!  Without committing to a plan the Nokia 6230i is 390
Euros "zonder abonnement" (without contract) in the Netherlands.  The
Razr V3 is 460 Euros "zonder abonnement" in the Netherlands.  Hardly
cheap.  The difference in Europe is that you'll get these premium
phones free with a one or two year commitments.  In the US you'll have
to pay $50 or so for a V3.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
         
Steven M. Scharf - 22 May 2005 18:14 GMT
> Amazon is selling Razr for 49.99 after rebates for new contract only. If
> anyone is interested, here is the link:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search/104-6553813-3087105?mode=w
ireless-phones&keyword=Motorola+V3&tag=mobileisgood-20

Note that it is not really a rebate, it is a $150 Amazon credit. Basically
Amazon is returning their kickback from Cingular.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.