I thought you'd enjoy this article, Lar...
http://www.physorg.com/news129793047.html
"Todd Allcock" <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote in news:TuDWj.58$ba4.18
@fe127.usenetserver.com:
> I thought you'd enjoy this article, Lar...
>
> http://www.physorg.com/news129793047.html
SO COOL! Thank you!.....(c;
5p is a pittance compared to $0.20US.
It's probably cheaper to get data from Voyager 1 in the Oort Cloud, now,
than from Verizon...(c;
....as I said before, "The most expensive data on the planet."
I guess "in the Solar System" is now more accurate!
Todd Allcock - 15 May 2008 03:52 GMT
> > http://www.physorg.com/news129793047.html
>
> SO COOL! Thank you!.....(c;
>
> 5p is a pittance compared to $0.20US.
Given the way the exchange rate is going, they'll be equivalent soon
enough, unfortunately! :-(
> It's probably cheaper to get data from Voyager 1 in the Oort Cloud, now,
> than from Verizon...(c;
>
> ....as I said before, "The most expensive data on the planet."
>
> I guess "in the Solar System" is now more accurate!
Yep- you'll need to update your rant in future posts! ;-)
Dennis Ferguson - 15 May 2008 05:37 GMT
> "Todd Allcock" <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote in news:TuDWj.58$ba4.18
> @fe127.usenetserver.com:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 5p is a pittance compared to $0.20US.
Not only that, but the 5p is only charged to the sender and the
receiver pays nothing. The $0.20 is double-dipped from both
ends.
Dennis Ferguson