Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / General / General Topics / July 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Motorola Bag Phones (analog only) have a programmable PRL?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Josh III - 18 Jul 2003 04:04 GMT
How do I update the PRL in an old Motorola Bag Phone (analog only)?
My carrier is Verizon.

Josh III
upstate south carolina
John S. - 18 Jul 2003 11:09 GMT
>How do I update the PRL in an old Motorola Bag Phone (analog only)?
>My carrier is Verizon.

The older (AMPS) system did not use a PRL. The carrier had a data base (as did
all the carriers) that checked to see if your carrier was a roaming partner and
allowed the phone to work if your carrier was. I suspect that this is still the
case.

--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Larry - 18 Jul 2003 18:20 GMT
SON, HOLD YOUR TONGUE!.....(c;

YOU control who the bagphone talks to.......not "them"!

When the "roam" sign comes on solid, you're paying roaming rates.
When it's blinking "roam" you're on the extended system.

(And they said I was the only AMPS customer left).....HA!

Enjoy your high fidelity, excellent ranged AMPS bagphone at LEAST
until Feb 16, 2008!  FCC extended us again....and probably will many
more times.....(c;

In Charleston, leave it on STD A/B and it'll try VZW before roaming
over to Alltel on extended.  Works great!

>How do I update the PRL in an old Motorola Bag Phone (analog only)?
>My carrier is Verizon.
>
>Josh III
>upstate south carolina

Larry

And now a word from our flamers and masochists.....
p lane - 18 Jul 2003 18:30 GMT
I don't know if its still true, but when analog was in wide use, sin
some areas verizon was an "a" system, and in others it might be a "B"
system, so depends on system--I used to call 611 to see if verizon or
whomever's customer service answered--I'm not sure if this still works
or not????

nospam@home.com (Larry) wrote in article
<3f182bb8.4969683@news.usenetserver.com>:
> SON, HOLD YOUR TONGUE!.....(c;
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> And now a word from our flamers and masochists.....
Larry - 19 Jul 2003 01:03 GMT
>I don't know if its still true, but when analog was in wide use, sin
>some areas verizon was an "a" system, and in others it might be a "B"
>system, so depends on system--I used to call 611 to see if verizon or
>whomever's customer service answered--I'm not sure if this still works
>or not????

Yes, it depends on who Verizon bought up and what system them had
whether Verizon is on A or B.  Here it's A....

Larry

And now a word from our flamers and masochists.....
Josh III - 18 Jul 2003 19:08 GMT
The only way to find the SID of the carrier when using an analog only phone
is to dial 611 and talk to a CSR?

I thought analog phones still communicated with the carrier via built-in
digital modem, i.e., communicating ESN, number dialed, etc.?

The bag phone in question is my Dad's exclusive car phone.    I used it on
extended trips myself a few times, but never really played with it to learn
all its capabilities/bells-n-whistles.

My first cellphone I owned personally was a digital nokia and my carrier is
Verizon.  I've had it a year and I'm just now finding out how get it to list
its SID.

Josh III
upstate south carolina

> .......
> YOU control who the bagphone talks to.......not "them"!
>
> When the "roam" sign comes on solid, you're paying roaming rates.
> When it's blinking "roam" you're on the extended system.
Justa Lurker - 18 Jul 2003 20:55 GMT
It was Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:20:40 GMT, and nospam@home.com
 (Larry) wrote in alt.cellular:
| SON, HOLD YOUR TONGUE!.....(c;

To thy own tounge be held!  Please answer correctly,
or don't answer at all.  Too many errors, Larry.

| YOU control who the bagphone talks to.......not "them"!

Partially true.  Any system can refuse any call except 911.

| When the "roam" sign comes on solid, you're paying
| roaming rates. When it's blinking "roam" you're on the
| extended system.

On a bag phone?  That's pure BS Larry and you know it. The
roam light only blinks when there is a short in the handset
on the led leads, :)  On a modern phone (non-bag phone) the
roaming should follow the pattern shown, but there is no
guarantee that ROAM = paying higher rates.  "Expect to pay
roaming rates." is more accurate, but billing doesn't know
or care what your roam indicator displayed at that moment.

| Enjoy your high fidelity, excellent ranged AMPS bagphone
| at LEAST until Feb 16, 2008!  FCC extended us again....
| and probably will many more times.....(c;

No extension Larry.  Prior to the date being set there was
no sunset to the AMPS rule.  The FCC's choosing a date is
NOT an extension, it is reducing the date from infinity to
something within the near future.

BTW: There is no PRL in a bag phone.  Later models had a
shorth SID list which could be marked positive or negative.
Some AMPS only phones had a longer list which could affect
the roam indication (Home, Roam, Negative per SID) but it
was not a PRL nor was it called a PRL.

JL
Larry - 19 Jul 2003 01:06 GMT
>| When the "roam" sign comes on solid, you're paying
>| roaming rates. When it's blinking "roam" you're on the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>roaming rates." is more accurate, but billing doesn't know
>or care what your roam indicator displayed at that moment.

Nope, sorry.  The ROAM sign blinks on some systems and is solid on on
others....just like I said.  Do YOU have one to play with or just
trolling?

The AMPS phones DO tell you what's extended and what's pure roaming.
Mine even did it in Florida going after the yacht.....(c;

Larry

And now a word from our flamers and masochists.....
Justa Lurker - 21 Jul 2003 03:25 GMT
It was Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:06:05 GMT, and nospam@home.com
 (Larry) wrote in alt.cellular:
|> On a bag phone?

No, Liar Larry.  Tri-Mode in AMPS mode, but not a bag phone.

JL
Jim MacKenzie - 21 Jul 2003 16:05 GMT
> It was Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:06:05 GMT, and nospam@home.com
>   (Larry) wrote in alt.cellular:
> |> On a bag phone?
>
> No, Liar Larry.  Tri-Mode in AMPS mode, but not a bag phone.

My Motorola bag phone shows a solid Roam indicator if I'm on a B side system
(my home system is also B), and a blinking Roam indicator if I'm on an A
side system.  If I subscribed to the A system instead, the indicator would
show the reverse.

Jim
p lane - 21 Jul 2003 17:31 GMT
I am not an expert on this, but I still have a bag phone I used in a
rather rural area-  and before there was as much roaming and
consolidation of smaller cellular providers, the bag phone a/b thing
worked pretty well--but you may or may not remember there was littlle
book issue with your contract--it was a listing by state of who and
where and MAINLY "what system either A or B you could roam with.
VErizon or at the time Cellular one, GTE, ete, etc, etc, depending on
where your home carrier was located, was usually an "A" system--but
there were MANY, MANY, MANY EXCEPTIONS"  For instance, on a road  trip
from Tn to Washington and on to New york--your "PREFERRED ROAM SYSTEM"
MIGHT CHANGE 5 OR 6 TIMES--YOU WOULD GET THE "PREFERRED" roam rates only
if you switched to the "A" or B system indicated in the little book--it
it's latter issues, the preferred systems were printed in red--and as
time went by, as verizon or whatever it was at that time, the red
listing grew, and grew.

It worked, but it was a little confusing, as a lot of folks didn't have
a clue as to what in h-- A?B was  much less how to change it--but if you
made a call, while off home system, roaming could cost as much a $1 or
more per minute if the wrong  A/B system were selected, or not selected
--arrantly now with the new digital systems, the prl thing does this
automatically.

I would appreciate further explanation if anyone can.

Again, I'm no expert, but I do remember the roaming books-and always had
it with me to travel

"Jim MacKenzie" <jim@dusykbarlow.sk.ca> wrote in article
<3f1c0167@news3.accesscomm.ca>:

> > It was Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:06:05 GMT, and nospam@home.com
> >   (Larry) wrote in alt.cellular:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jim
Joshua Csepegi - 21 Jul 2003 20:35 GMT
Well thats not a total lie I do know that the older motorola programming
did have multiple sid enteries, their for making sort of a prl since it
has more than one sid.
so you could be right but why the long post ,when we aquire other
carriers and absorb their network, wouldn't the obvious answer be that
we change the sid registered at that tower?
Signature

Josh Csepegi
Sr. Sales Represenative
Fredom Wireless
Verizon Wireless Agents

The opinions  expressed here are the opinions of Joshua Csepegi  These
opinions in no way are the thoughts or opinions of Freedom wireless , or
Verizon wireless.

plane@usa.com (p lane) wrote in article
<vho5a4ohelq3d9@corp.supernews.com>:

> I am not an expert on this, but I still have a bag phone I used in a
> rather rural area-  and before there was as much roaming and
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
p lane - 21 Jul 2003 21:03 GMT
I don't think you understood what I was saying--until the auto prl in
the phones, it was up to the user of the phone to know what system the
phone might be roaming or not roaming on--the roam light on the phone
would never be on home unless, it were located in the home area( the
home sid)  verizon could change the sys id of the carriers they buy, but
I doubt they could change the system from an "a" System to a B"
system--it was a nightmare,much better now--with the new phones--
however what I said is mostly right, as I mentioned
On the very last model moto's (bags and others) I believe you could load
in sys codes which would exclude a particular systems use--to keep you
from roaming off the wrong system
I still have an old moto bag phone which I keep to use out in the
hills--it would have to be a big emergency to try to use it out of home
area--(it's on a local plan)

The old phones had three indications, home, and roam, the roam would
either flash or be solid==indicating roaming on the home t ype carrier
or the other system--I forget which-and was I am trying to indicate,
most folks didn't have clue as to what A/B was or how to change it-
However at that time a call on the wrong system could cost over a
$1/minute
-for the most part this has now been fixed--pardon the long post

joshcsepegi@hotmail.com (Joshua Csepegi) wrote in article
<vhog40o9bcikd4@corp.supernews.com>:
> Well thats not a total lie I do know that the older motorola programming
> did have multiple sid enteries, their for making sort of a prl since it
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
Jim MacKenzie - 21 Jul 2003 23:26 GMT
> On the very last model moto's (bags and others) I believe you could load
> in sys codes which would exclude a particular systems use--to keep you
> from roaming off the wrong system

That's exactly right.  But you can't tell it to *prefer* a certain SID.  If
a provider had the same SID nationwide, that would be great if the phone
supported it.  But Motorola analog phones don't.  You can just tell them who
to avoid using.  This might not be desirable if, e.g., the other side system
was very expensive but had coverage where your native provider didn't.

Jim
p lane - 21 Jul 2003 21:07 GMT
Short question:  If you bought an established "b" system, could you
reassign the sys code that would also be used in an "a" system--if I'm
not wrong, on the old motorola, when you loaded a particular sys code,
this also automatically assigned the a/b system and the other parameters
needed at that time.

joshcsepegi@hotmail.com (Joshua Csepegi) wrote in article
<vhog40o9bcikd4@corp.supernews.com>:
> Well thats not a total lie I do know that the older motorola programming
> did have multiple sid enteries, their for making sort of a prl since it
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
Isaiah Beard - 21 Jul 2003 22:40 GMT
>>On a bag phone?  That's pure BS Larry and you know it. The
>>roam light only blinks when there is a short in the handset
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> others....just like I said.  Do YOU have one to play with or just
> trolling?

IIRC, the ROAM light would blink on my old Motorola AMPS phone when i
had it.  However, the blinking wasn't really determined by any internal
list in the phone, but rather by how the phone was programmed.  If the
phone's home system ws on the A side, then all A side roaming systems
would blink.  If the home system was "B" then all "B" systems would
blink.  The assumption was that A side carriers would tend to have more
favorable roaming agreements with other A sides, and the same would be
true for B carriers.

Of course in practice, this didn't always hold true, but it was
frequently correct.  Back when I ahd Bell Atalntic Mobile on AMPS, I
remember being told that follow-me roaming would only work on B
carriers, with the exception of a couple markets where BAM was A-side.
Jim MacKenzie - 21 Jul 2003 16:04 GMT
> On a bag phone?  That's pure BS Larry and you know it. The
> roam light only blinks when there is a short in the handset
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> roaming rates." is more accurate, but billing doesn't know
> or care what your roam indicator displayed at that moment.

It depends where you are, alright.  I was in northeastern Montana and
northwestern North Dakota on Saturday.  All I could get was a solid ROAM on
the B side (I'm on the B carrier here).  (My GSM phone was a paperweight of
course, although we have lots of GSM coverage up here in Canada.)  And that
would likely have cost me a couple of dollars a minute, but it did work (I
called a test busy signal number to be sure).  But if I were in Alberta or
Manitoba, the phone would look the same, but I'd only be using my bucket of
minutes and pay no extra fees.  The other analog provider up here shows ROAM
about fifteen minutes in any direction out of the city, but you don't pay
extra as long as you're on its towers.  It just has a ton of different SIDs,
and as soon as you're on a new SID, your phone shows ROAM.

Jim
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.