>>6590 has been pulled. There are too many teenagers wanting game-phones
>>with color screens. 6590 has gotten a bad rap with extremely high
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>I sure wouldn't mind getting a Nokia 6600 when they come out!
>I lost my last phone (a V60gi that I'd JUST gotten... neat little
>phone, but REALLY slow response, REALLY long time starting up, etc.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>to look "cool" and instead take a clue from Sony-Ericsson and
>have functional buttons, nicely spaced, that you can find by touch.
The buttons on the 6590i are small, but I've gotten used to them. I like
the small phones because they are much nicer to jog with clipped onto my
side/back with a case. The larger phones I've had before (e.g., 3590,
5190, etc.) are too large/heavy for that type of stuff. I would borrow my
wife's 8290, but that was always a pain.
>If it were a little faster and had better reception, I like the
>Sony-Ericsson T616. What I'm pissed about is how Cingular is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Is that true, do you think?
Is what part true?
I don't think Cingular ever sold a phone that worked "everywhere". There
are too many standards and frequencies. A phone that worked "everywhere"
would have to be quad-band GSM+dual-band CDMA+dual band TDMA+AMPS
(excluding iDEN here).
The closest thing Cingular has sold as being closest to working
"everywhere" would be their tri-band GSM phones or their GAIT phones. I
have noted that Cingular has changed from using 3650 (tri-band world GSM
phone) to using a 3600 (dual-band USA GSM phone).
Perhaps that's what they were talking about -- people selling their 3650s
to people in Europe. Now I guess people that want to do that will have to
go with ATTWS or TMobile who still sell the 3650s.
Spammay Blockay - 31 Jul 2003 21:51 GMT
>>So I got a 6590i... had most of what I wanted, and they had some
>>in stock at the local Cingular place. Friggin' TINY buttons,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>5190, etc.) are too large/heavy for that type of stuff. I would borrow my
>wife's 8290, but that was always a pain.
I like the small phones, too, because I can carry them around
without them bulging in my pockets. But even on that small
phone, the call/end buttons are teensy, a couple of mm wide,
and set right NEXT to the select/menu buttons, which are
much larger. It's VERY easy to hit one of them instead.
A little bit of separation, just a couple of MM, would have
made all the difference. My thumbs weren't made for it. :-)
>>If it were a little faster and had better reception, I like the
>>Sony-Ericsson T616. What I'm pissed about is how Cingular is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Is what part true?
The part about why Cingular would stop selling tri-band phones.
Which you answered, thanks. :-)
Hard to believe the problem would be SO big that they'd
stop selling those phones, though.
- Tim
>I don't think Cingular ever sold a phone that worked "everywhere". There
>are too many standards and frequencies. A phone that worked "everywhere"
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>to people in Europe. Now I guess people that want to do that will have to
>go with ATTWS or TMobile who still sell the 3650s.
--
Anonymous Sender - 31 Jul 2003 23:50 GMT
>>Is what part true?
>
>The part about why Cingular would stop selling tri-band phones.
>Which you answered, thanks. :-)
Well, they actually still are selling tri-band GSM phones here in
California. In particular, the Motorola v60gi, the Sony Ericsson
T306/T316/T606s, and the Nokia 6100.
>Hard to believe the problem would be SO big that they'd
>stop selling those phones, though.
I wonder if it's just a thing with the Nokia 3650/3600?
I have to admit, the Nokia 3650/3600 are NICE phones, except they are too
stinking big. I'm looking forward to the Nokia 6600 with its BIG 65K color
screen but SMALL size.