>>Well, with your logic no one needs to pay for Microsoft Word. You can
>>pretty much create your own documents for free with a notepad and a
>>little knowledge of postscript.
>
> Wordpad is actually quite useful.
>>I think will use MS Word instead.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>>> Thanks, but I'll stick with the superior free stuff.
>>Well, there is always a price to pay. Either learning curve or ease of
>>use.
>
> I respectfully disagree.
>>>Well, with your logic no one needs to pay for Microsoft Word. You can
>>>pretty much create your own documents for free with a notepad and a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Notepad is simpler to use. Makes Typing the few hundred lines of
>postscript code easier in the long run.
YMMV (as always) -- I personally find Wordpad more useful -- does everything
Notepad does and more, while still being easy to use and light on resources.
>>>I think will use MS Word instead.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>>>> Thanks, but I'll stick with the superior free stuff.
>Thank you. My point exactly.
That juxtaposition of quotes referring to different things is yours, not mine.
The former quote is about alternatives to Microsoft Word (free and not free).
The latter is about software to create MP3 clips, and "superior" is an
important part of my point, that the free tools are actually better than the
not free tools, not just less expensive.
>Always pick the right tool for the right
>task.
Agreed.
>Why format documents by hand when it's easier to use the tools
>created for that purpose.
Why have a separate and less capable app for MP3 ringtones when more capable
apps will do it better, and do other useful things as well, while still being
very easy to use.
>Just like the app at myphonefiles.com was
>created for the purpose of making and sending ringtones to the phone. No
>more no less.
That doesn't automatically make it the "right tool" (IMHO at least) -- the
free tools I've mentioned (Audacity and RazorLAME) produce better results with
less effort, and transferring tones to the phone can be done in ways that can
be more convenient.
>>>Voicetones Studio is geared towards making ringtones and MP3 encoders
>>>are not.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>use the same lame mp3 codec (the lib), so there is nothing superior about
>either one as far as quality of MP3 encoding goes.
RazorLAME, in addition to being free, allows you to easily tune the result to
meet your own requirements (and to easily take advantage of the latest version
of LAME). In addition, Audacity and RazorLAME are applicable to other popular
uses, such as the encoding of MP3 files for portable MP3 players, thereby
reducing the need to learn and maintain multiple applications.
>I think most people would like to just open an audio file, highlight the
>part they want, and send it to the phone. No fuss, no mess, quick and
>easy.
Whereas I think many (most?) people would prefer more capable tools that
produce better results. It's why so many people pay 2-3 times the price for
"gourmet" coffee versus the standard stuff.
>The app at myphonefiles.com was made with ringtones in mind and
>nothing else.
I see that as both a strength and a weakness. YMMV.
Regardless, different strokes for different folks -- if you prefer the app at
myphonefiles.com, then by all means use it. I personally prefer the free
tools I've mentioned and the superior results they produce.

Signature
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular