Hi folks,
Regarding the Motorola V180 . . .
Amazon.com describes this phone as . . .
"quad-band global coverage capability"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0003QEAB6/qid=1112714517/sr=1-1/r
ef=sr_1_1_etk-phones/103-7512312-7246224?v=glance&s=wireless&n=301187
Cingular describes this phone as . . .
"Operates on 850/900/1900 MHz GSM/GPRS networks "
http://onlinestored.cingular.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ES_PHONES.jsp?leftMen
uFlag=phone&storeId=14851&langId=-1&catalogId=14851&storeAlias=hlybmi&svcAreaId=
SCR
T-Mobile describes this phone as . . .
"International phone: Tri-band (1900,1800,900 MHz)"
http://tmobile.com/products/overview.asp?phoneid=230863&class=phone
Motorola describes this phone for Cingular GSM as . . .
"For use on GSM 850/900/1900 networks"
http://commerce.motorola.com/consumer/QWhtml/phone_cat.html
Motorola describes this phone for T-Mobile as . . .
"For use on GSM 900/1800/1900 networks"
http://commerce.motorola.com/consumer/QWhtml/phone_cat.html
Wirefly describes this phone as . . .
"Quad Band GSM Allows Roaming In More Than 150 Countries"
https://www.inphonic.com/PhoneDetails.aspx?referringdomain=CNET1&oflag=sof1&zipc
ode=18431&refcode1=MOTV180CIN&refcode2=&eid=&agent=&originpage=/sOnePager.asp&ca
rrierid=62&phoneid=9096&planid=13347&curPhoneId=9096&LinkPage=sonepager.asp
Phonescoop describes this phone as . . .
"Modes GSM 800/GSM 1800/GSM 1900
carrier-dependent (can be dual-band, tri-band, or quad-band) "
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=466
Is it possible that this is really, physically, a quad band phone, but
the carriers use the software to disable it so it can only work
internationally on their system?
Bill Kraski - 09 Apr 2005 05:11 GMT
> Hi folks,
>
> Regarding the Motorola V180 . . .
>
> Amazon.com describes this phone as . . .
> "quad-band global coverage capability"
Depends on the phone. The ones AT&T supplied were quad band, most now
offered in the US are triband. And, per a message in another thread, I
understand that at least some unbranded V180s are also quad band. Which
means that if I ever switch to a true Cingular plan, I'm going to unlock my
AT&T V180 instead of gettingf Cingular's tribander. :-)
Bill K
Jerome Zelinske - 09 Apr 2005 05:49 GMT
Or, the phones could be built for each carrier with just the
circuits/components that the carrier wants. Meaning that they might not
be quad band. It may not be just a software difference.
Jer - 09 Apr 2005 13:27 GMT
> Or, the phones could be built for each carrier with just the
> circuits/components that the carrier wants. Meaning that they might not
> be quad band. It may not be just a software difference.
Considering the sophisticated level of software/firmware, I just cannot
imagine any manufacturer assembly line being split between two models.

Signature
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
Tropical Haven - 09 Apr 2005 13:34 GMT
> Or, the phones could be built for each carrier with just the
> circuits/components that the carrier wants. Meaning that they might not
> be quad band. It may not be just a software difference.
I highly doubt that, for example, Motorola would develop a Cingular
V180, an AT&T V180, and a T-Mobile V180 all from scratch using
differenct circuitry and just putting them in the same case. R&D would
cost too much, as each carrier would have have new circuitry developed.
Vidguy11 - 09 Apr 2005 10:47 GMT
usually, th ephone has the quad band setting, but the carriers block ou
one of the frequencies and adjus it to their own, aking the phon
triband, there is a way to bring out the fourth band on a v180, i'l
let you guys know how its done once i find out, but you do require th
cabl
rjdriver - 09 Apr 2005 13:27 GMT
<SNIP>
> Is it possible that this is really, physically, a quad band phone, but
> the carriers use the software to disable it so it can only work
> internationally on their system?
More important than the number of bands might be the frequent reports of
serious problems with this phone due to poor build quality. Cheap plastic
covers, screens cracking, etc. This doesn't appear to be one of Moto's
better efforts.
Bob