Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / August 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why does waptunnel suck so bad?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
SuperBobo - 24 Aug 2003 19:39 GMT
I have a hard time getting ANY sites to work on waptunnel.
Dictionary.com, yahoo.com, movietickets.com, mapquest.com.. RARELY
work.

My question is: ok we can agree that waptunnel blows.  WHY does it
work so poorly?  network overload?  buggy programming?  being blocked?
WHY?  What is the specific problem(s)?

B
KA7EII - 24 Aug 2003 22:28 GMT
> I have a hard time getting ANY sites to work on waptunnel.
> Dictionary.com, yahoo.com, movietickets.com, mapquest.com.. RARELY
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> B

Yes, the free wap tunnel can be picky and fickle but as my dad would
say: "what do you want for free...blood".

I have been having trouble getting into Yahoo.   Guess if I want
better wap access I'll have to pay the extra $4.99.

I'm using a Palm Pilot connected to my Audiovox CDM-9155 on a Verizon
AC plan-works much better than the wap tunnel.
SuperBobo - 25 Aug 2003 19:33 GMT
Riiiight I figured I'd get a bunch of replies saying "Hey it's a free
service what do you expect" but that's not what I'm asking about.

I'm asking WHY does the service suck?  WHY.  What specific things make
waptunnel work so poorly?

Thanks to those who've addressed the question.

B

> > I have a hard time getting ANY sites to work on waptunnel.
> > Dictionary.com, yahoo.com, movietickets.com, mapquest.com.. RARELY
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I'm using a Palm Pilot connected to my Audiovox CDM-9155 on a Verizon
> AC plan-works much better than the wap tunnel.
jer - 26 Aug 2003 01:37 GMT
> Riiiight I figured I'd get a bunch of replies saying "Hey it's a free
> service what do you expect" but that's not what I'm asking about.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks to those who've addressed the question.

It would be my guess that Cingular isn't allocating resources to
Waptunnel due to the lack of support from the billing dept.  OTOH, a
sucky Waptunnel makes their other offerings seem much more plausible -
maybe even more affordable.  If Cingular made Waptunnel work well
despite the costs, one would be less likely to actually pay for
anything better.  So, yes, it is as it should be, you get what you pay
for.

Signature

jer  email reply - I am not a 'ten'  ICQ = 35253273
"All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of
what we know."  -- Richard Wilbur

John Navas - 26 Aug 2003 03:03 GMT
>> Riiiight I figured I'd get a bunch of replies saying "Hey it's a free
>> service what do you expect" but that's not what I'm asking about.
>>
>> I'm asking WHY does the service suck?  WHY.  What specific things make
>> waptunnel work so poorly?

>It would be my guess that Cingular isn't allocating resources to
>Waptunnel due to the lack of support from the billing dept.  OTOH, a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>anything better.  So, yes, it is as it should be, you get what you pay
>for.

Cingular wouldn't seem to have anything to do with it.

Signature

Best regards,        HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas           <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular

jer - 26 Aug 2003 06:07 GMT
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Cingular wouldn't seem to have anything to do with it.

If only Cingular users have trouble, then...  If all carriers have
trouble, then...

Signature

jer  email reply - I am not a 'ten'  ICQ = 35253273
"All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of
what we know."  -- Richard Wilbur

Frederick Claus - 26 Aug 2003 15:49 GMT
What phone are you using and what setting did you use? I was trying to set
my 6340i up on the Waptunnel, but was told that Cingular blocked it. So it
may not be the fact of "What do you want? It's free", but instead a matter
of  "Hey, Cingular does not want to throw money away, so they blocked 3rd
party services that cost less than theirs."

What are the settings you used. I will try it myself and let you konw.

Fred

> I have a hard time getting ANY sites to work on waptunnel.
> Dictionary.com, yahoo.com, movietickets.com, mapquest.com.. RARELY
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> B
John Navas - 26 Aug 2003 03:04 GMT
>What phone are you using and what setting did you use? I was trying to set
>my 6340i up on the Waptunnel, but was told that Cingular blocked it. So it
>may not be the fact of "What do you want? It's free", but instead a matter
>of  "Hey, Cingular does not want to throw money away, so they blocked 3rd
>party services that cost less than theirs."

No, Cingular just has different services.  Wireless Internet and Wireless
Internet Express are limited to Cingular's own WAP gateway, but with general
Internet access (e.g., ISP.Cingular), you can use any WAP gateway you want.

Signature

Best regards,        HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas           <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.