>>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive? Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> See above comment again. Your turn.

Signature
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
>>>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive? Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Forget it Mark, I don't have the patience for childish tit-for-tat games.
No problem, little boy. You can dish it out with your very own childish
comment about "doing something stupid" comment, but can't take it. You are
pathetically beyond predictable.
Oh, one more thing - enjoy the last word.
Jer - 26 May 2005 05:07 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive? Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Oh, one more thing - enjoy the last word.
Okay, I will. I don't answer calls from idiots that hide their CID.
Ever. Why? Simple. If you don't want me to know who's calling, I
don't give a sh.t about why you're calling, so you're welcome to go f.ck
yourself. Privacy Manager on my home landline weeds that sh.t out
perfectly and permanently. The OP complained that Cingular wanted $25
to block CID on outbound calls. IMO, that's a stupid thing to do
because it indicates the caller doesn't have a pair. So, I'll say it
again, doing something stupid should be expensive. Personally, I think
$25 is chump change because I spent that on supper tonight.
Oh, one more thing, I can take whatever you dish out because I have a
pair. And thank you for giving me the Last Word.

Signature
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'