Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

$25 one time fee to block my caller ID info?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
thegoods - 19 May 2005 07:03 GMT
Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
Jer - 19 May 2005 15:21 GMT
> Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.

I dunno...  some of us think doing something stupid should be expensive.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Mark - 19 May 2005 16:48 GMT
>> Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>
>I dunno...  some of us think doing something stupid should be expensive.

Then you must live paycheck to paycheck.
Jer - 20 May 2005 00:26 GMT
>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>
>>I dunno...  some of us think doing something stupid should be expensive.
>
> Then you must live paycheck to paycheck.

I have no idea what you're trying to say, but no, I don't.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

thegoods - 20 May 2005 05:26 GMT
>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>
>>>I dunno...  some of us think doing something stupid should be expensive.
>>
>> Then you must live paycheck to paycheck.

LOL

>I have no idea what you're trying to say

Whoosh.
bamp - 20 May 2005 16:31 GMT
>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Whoosh.

You Whooshed me too!

bamp
Mark - 24 May 2005 11:48 GMT
>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>I have no idea what you're trying to say,

'nuff said.
Jer - 24 May 2005 13:57 GMT
>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> 'nuff said.

Uh oh, a pithy remark - totally worthless, but very pithy.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Mark - 24 May 2005 14:22 GMT
>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Uh oh, a pithy remark - totally worthless, but very pithy.

Still don't get it, do ya?  LOL!
Jer - 24 May 2005 23:55 GMT
>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Still don't get it, do ya?  LOL!

No, I don't.  You suspected me of living from paycheck to paycheck, and
I don't.  If I wanted to have my carrier permanently block the sending
of my CID on each and every call, I could easily afford to do that.  I
can't imagine why I would do such a stupid thing regardless of my cost.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Mark - 25 May 2005 11:44 GMT
>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>No, I don't.  

See above comment again.  Your turn.
Jer - 25 May 2005 14:04 GMT
>>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> See above comment again.  Your turn.

Forget it Mark, I don't have the patience for childish tit-for-tat games.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Mark - 25 May 2005 16:36 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Forget it Mark, I don't have the patience for childish tit-for-tat games.

No problem, little boy.  You can dish it out with your very own childish
comment about "doing something stupid" comment, but can't take it.  You are
pathetically beyond predictable.

Oh, one more thing - enjoy the last word.
Jer - 26 May 2005 05:07 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>Isn't that a tad expensive?  Sprint blocked it for free.
>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Oh, one more thing - enjoy the last word.

Okay, I will.  I don't answer calls from idiots that hide their CID.
Ever.  Why?  Simple.  If you don't want me to know who's calling, I
don't give a sh.t about why you're calling, so you're welcome to go f.ck 
yourself.  Privacy Manager on my home landline weeds that sh.t out
perfectly and permanently.  The OP complained that Cingular wanted $25
to block CID on outbound calls.  IMO, that's a stupid thing to do
because it indicates the caller doesn't have a pair.  So, I'll say it
again, doing something stupid should be expensive.  Personally, I think
$25 is chump change because I spent that on supper tonight.

Oh, one more thing, I can take whatever you dish out because I have a
pair.  And thank you for giving me the Last Word.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

fusion - 26 May 2005 21:52 GMT
Never heard of $25 dollars to block your caller id. what state do yo
live in
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.