>>>Yesterday (Sunday), I received a voicemail from a business associate. The
>>>problem is that the message was left on the previous Wednesday. If it
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> precautions are normally taken doesn't make me any less annoyed that a voice
> mail took four days to get through Cingulars system.

Signature
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
>>>>Yesterday (Sunday), I received a voicemail from a business associate.
>>>>The problem is that the message was left on the previous Wednesday. If
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> move around, but it's not good enough to substitute for our shortcoming of
> not following the rules of message confirmation.
Are you saying that if he had checked his voice mail earlier (before
receiveing the message Wait Indicator) that the message would have been
there?
Jud Hardcastle - 29 Jun 2005 16:39 GMT
> > The voice mail message didn't take four days to "get through" the system.
> > What you experienced was a four day delay for your handset to receive the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> receiveing the message Wait Indicator) that the message would have been
> there?
Of course that's what he's saying. Those voice mail systems are pretty
simple really--having worked with several Octel VM systems for years I
can't think of any method that the actual voice mail could have been
delayed from being put in the box. Short of a major drive crash of
course. You can check the box one SECOND after the caller hangs up and
the message will be there. On the other hand there have been lots of
reports here about the VM *Indicator* signal not being sent until later
(or not at all) or getting left on.

Signature
Jud
Dallas TX USA
nospam@ptd.net - 29 Jun 2005 19:03 GMT
>>>>>Yesterday (Sunday), I received a voicemail from a business associate.
>>>>>The problem is that the message was left on the previous Wednesday. If
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>receiveing the message Wait Indicator) that the message would have been
>there?
I would bet you $10 that's the case. Where would the message be for
four days if not on the VM server?
That MWI delay is one of the reasons I got rid of Nextel. If you are
out of range for long enough, it may take a day to get your messages
when you get a signal again.
Jer - 29 Jun 2005 23:45 GMT
>>>>>Yesterday (Sunday), I received a voicemail from a business associate.
>>>>>The problem is that the message was left on the previous Wednesday. If
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> receiveing the message Wait Indicator) that the message would have been
> there?
Yup. When a caller is prompted to leave a message, that announcement is
coming from the VM system itself, and when a message is deposited for
the recipient, it's deposited directly into the VM system.
Subsequently, the VM system is supposed to send a signal to the
recipients handset to inform them a new message is available.
Regardless of whether the "new message" (MWI) signal was received by the
reciopient, the message can still be retrieved at any time after it was
deposited.
Virtually all carrier class (NEBS 3 compliant) VM systems (Cingular uses
Octel and Anypath by Lucent) have multiple disk drives for a message
store. Single drive failure has no impact on subscriber service -
that's what makes them carrier class - carrier class communication
systems are fully duplicated internally, are externally connected with
multiple fault-tolerant interfaces, and are designed and operated to
tolerate single component failure without adverse impact to subscribers.
And no, you probably don't want to see the price tag.
http://www.lucent.com/solutions/anypath.html?3

Signature
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
RICHARD GORDON - 30 Jun 2005 13:28 GMT
>Yes, there are times when MWI is delayed for some period of time due to
> >>>>system glithes. .
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> reciopient, the message can still be retrieved at any time after it was
> deposited.
Hi to all,
There seem to be a couple of additional glitches going on at the
moment but they may be affecting only a small number of users.
We use a GAIT phone and have noticed that if we are on the TDMA side
of the Orange network we may not receive the VMI until we are back in
GSM coverage.
We have also noticed substantial delays in receiving VMI if the
message was left in a Blue network area eg NYC. Often the VMI pops up
when we cross back into Orange territory in CT or MA. I think the
record was a 5 day delay in VMI
Needless to say we are manually checking voice mail several times a
day !
Obviously if this is predominantly a network 'meshing' issue it will
be solved fairly quickly.
Even so it's more a human engineering issue than a telco engineering
issue and I agree with you that the rules of message confirmation are
fundamental.
Richard
Jer - 01 Jul 2005 01:45 GMT
>>Yes, there are times when MWI is delayed for some period of time due
>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> Richard
Network 'meshing' seems like a good way to put it, Richard. According
to my orange buds, the 'meshing' of the orange and blue is ongoing, but
eventually sorts itself out once the dust settles.

Signature
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'