Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cingular using 850MHz GSM in SF Bay Area?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave Schreiber - 28 Jun 2005 03:47 GMT
I live in the San Francisco Bay Area (Mountain View, specifically), and am
currently a Verizon subscriber. My contract just ended, and I'm trying to
decide if I want to stick with Verizon, or move to Cingular.  I really
like Cingular's choice of phones, and I despise the way Verizon cripples
Bluetooth, but in the end, the most important thing for me is coverage.  
And in the Bay Area, Verizon has had better coverage than Cingular for
years.

But, when AT&T and Cingular merged, there was talk about Cingular moving
all their customers to 850MHz GSM from 1900MHz which would, in theory,
greatly improve coverage.  What'd I like to know is:  has this migration
happened in the Bay Area?  If not, is Cingular planning on doing this
switch in the near future?

I'd also appreciate hearing any general comments on how Cingular's
coverage has improved (if at all) in the Bay Area since the merged was
completed.

Thanks very much.

Signature

Dave Schreiber
davids@truedave.com
dks@sonic.net

Jerome Zelinske - 28 Jun 2005 04:17 GMT
    Changing frequency would not necessarily mean an increase in coverage.
 Being able to utilize both sets of antenna sites might help fill in
"holes" and might add large areas, so in that way coverage could
increase.  Where they have licenses for both frequencies, they are
probably adding 800 MHz equipment to all their 1900 MHz antenna sites,
and 1900 MHz equipment to all their 800 MHz sites, there by maximizing
both coverage and capacity.

> I live in the San Francisco Bay Area (Mountain View, specifically), and am
> currently a Verizon subscriber. My contract just ended, and I'm trying to
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks very much.
Miles - 28 Jun 2005 07:38 GMT
> I live in the San Francisco Bay Area (Mountain View, specifically), and am
> currently a Verizon subscriber. My contract just ended, and I'm trying to
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks very much.

Not certain what they are doing, but whatever it is it is working great!
A few days ago I asked in the Cingular store in San Rafael as to their
frequencies and speaking with two reps they didn't know!  I do know that
it works fine in San Rafael, Fairfax, Woodacre, Lagunitas, Olema, Point
Reyes Station, Inverness and believe it or not even Camp Taylor.   I'm
using a Nokia 6250 900/1800/1900, and I tried the same route with a moto
850 plus I don't recall, but it was not a quad band. Prior to acquiring
AT&T Cingular did not work at all west of San Anselmo.  Obviously they
have now upgraded AT&T's towers, at least in this area.  Best you ask a
few Cingular customers -- friends or just walk into a few stores and ask
the customers.

Incidentally, it works fine with BT, but that is Nokia -- voice dialing
via BT is a great advent for me.   A few people have told me that during
peak hours they cannot make connection -- Cingular is becoming too
popular for their current abilities.  One lady told me that in talking
with Cingular in San Francisco that if someone is closer to the tower
than you, you can me thrown off, and they get on!

Miles
nospam@ptd.net - 29 Jun 2005 19:00 GMT
>> I live in the San Francisco Bay Area (Mountain View, specifically), and am
>> currently a Verizon subscriber. My contract just ended, and I'm trying to
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
>Miles

I don't think so.  It's pretty much whoever is using the channel first
keeps it with GSM.  Your call could drop if your call tries to move to
a tower that is busy but the only way you can get bumped is with that
newly implemented law enforcement priority I believe.

It may work differently with CDMA.
Tropical Haven - 30 Jun 2005 17:07 GMT
> >Incidentally, it works fine with BT, but that is Nokia -- voice dialing
> >via BT is a great advent for me.   A few people have told me that during
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> It may work differently with CDMA.

I think I have heard that CDMA suffers from the "shrinking cell effect", which
means when a tower reaches capacity, the people closest to the tower are the ones
the system keeps on.  It would explain while I was in Chicago 2 years ago why the
Verizon phone I used would sometimes have "full" signal in one place, and minutes
later have no signal at all (Verizon was terrible overloaded when I was there.)

TH
nospam@ptd.net - 02 Jul 2005 13:44 GMT
>> >Incidentally, it works fine with BT, but that is Nokia -- voice dialing
>> >via BT is a great advent for me.   A few people have told me that during
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>TH

That's it.  And I think weaker users will actually get dropped.
Tropical Haven - 03 Jul 2005 05:12 GMT
> >> >Incidentally, it works fine with BT, but that is Nokia -- voice dialing
> >> >via BT is a great advent for me.   A few people have told me that during
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> That's it.  And I think weaker users will actually get dropped.

Not to mention the normal voice quality with CDMA...I don't think I will ever go back.

TH
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.