Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

moving from TDMA to GSM in SF (and could use a phone recommendation)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lalaland5000 - 02 Jul 2005 22:07 GMT
i'm a former AT&T Wireless customer, and i got a letter from cingular last
week that is basically offering me 2x the minutes for the same price (new
deal: 1000 min for $40) if i switch over to GSM (2 yr contract).

AT&T's GSM network was terrible in San Francisco a couple of years ago (so
much so that i forced them to switch me back to TDMA) - is cingular's
current network any better?

also, the phones they've offered me (Samsung C207 free after rebate, and
Moto V551 for $50 after rebate) don't seem that great to me. do you think
it'd be possible to get them to cut me a deal on say, a nokia 6230 or
something? i have friends who have been able to get Sprint to kick in some
pretty good deals for them when they called - is cingular as willing to
negotiate?

any other recommendations for cheap, durable, high quality phones would be
super appreciated too -- i'll sacrifice whizbang features for good sound,
reception, and build quality (small size is good too).

thanks in advance for the help!

lalaland5000
Yazzan Gable - 03 Jul 2005 19:29 GMT
I guess it depends on where you are in SF.  I'm in the Richmond District
and in my area, ATT would get 5 bars and Cingular 1 bar if I was lucky
and standing in the right spot.  

Since I got a 64K SIM and started using it on my Cingular issued ENS
enabled phone, I get nothing but 5 bars in most areas of SF.  

Friggin' amazing!  It's almost like the commercials!  

> i'm a former AT&T Wireless customer, and i got a letter from cingular last
> week that is basically offering me 2x the minutes for the same price (new
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> lalaland5000
Jimmy Smith - 06 Jul 2005 02:09 GMT
I am not in SF but I was a very long term ATT TDMA customer who recently
"upgraded" to Cingular GSM.  I live in a major metropolitan city and thus
far I have experienced more dropped calls with GSM in the last three weeks
than I have experienced with TDMA in the last 5 years.  I have tried three
different phones and there is a tremendous difference.

The rollover minutes and price was good but I really wonder about this
functionality.  Now, I am assuming Cingular will add more bandwidth or
whatever they need to do really fast because as it stands, for me anyway,
there is no comparison and I wish I had not changed as this point.  BTW, I
have a relative who lives in Chicago area and they alerted me before I
changed about the spotty reception.  I blew them off and when for the
rollover minutes and other doodads.  I hope to heaven they get this thing
tuned in better.

> i'm a former AT&T Wireless customer, and i got a letter from cingular last
> week that is basically offering me 2x the minutes for the same price (new
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> lalaland5000
John Navas - 09 Jul 2005 03:11 GMT
>also, the phones they've offered me (Samsung C207 free after rebate, and
>Moto V551 for $50 after rebate) don't seem that great to me. ...

FYI, the Moto V551 is arguably the best phone currently offered by Cingular.

Signature

Best regards,        HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas           <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.