Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Analog signals & Cingular cell towers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tom Frey - 25 Aug 2005 02:42 GMT
Can a Cingular cell tower record the approximate direction of an old analog
phone signal?
Mij Adyaw - 25 Aug 2005 03:06 GMT
No. Why would it want to? What is the purpose?

> Can a Cingular cell tower record the approximate direction of an old
> analog
> phone signal?
Tom Frey - 25 Aug 2005 03:34 GMT
My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
think they can, and suspect they can also tell the approximate direction of
the signal. So I thought I would pose the question here.

> No. Why would it want to? What is the purpose?
>
> > Can a Cingular cell tower record the approximate direction of an old
> > analog
> > phone signal?
Scott - 25 Aug 2005 03:51 GMT
Call the police and let them handle it (if she is really missing that
is).

>My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
>is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> > analog
>> > phone signal?
[ a m z ] - 25 Aug 2005 03:59 GMT
I believe the only way they could figure out the direction of the signal
would be to have 2 or more towers that picked up the phone's ID.  From
there, based on signal strength, they should be able to triangulate.  Then
again, I might be assuming that the system is more sophisticated than it may
actually be.  Get the police involved.  They're undoubtedly more likely to
get telco cooperation.

> My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
> is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > > Can a Cingular cell tower record the approximate direction of an old
> > > analog phone signal?
Tom Frey - 25 Aug 2005 04:28 GMT
The police are involved guys, she has been missing 29 days. Problem is
Cingular is giving the police the same story, and I still don't believe it.
Cell towers have three antenas and they could easily could use doppler
effect for direction finding, but I'm not sure if they do. I'm hoping
someone here with actual experience can answer the question for certain. I
know of no other place to shop for experts for a second opinion.

> My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
> is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > > analog
> > > phone signal?
Isaiah Beard - 27 Aug 2005 07:51 GMT
> The police are involved guys, she has been missing 29 days. Problem is
> Cingular is giving the police the same story, and I still don't believe it.

At that late stage (29 days) there's another factor to consider.  Is it
believed she might have a cell phone charger with her?  I hate to put a
damper on the possibilities here, but given that it's an AMPS phone, I
fear the battery isn't going to last long and without recharging, and
without access to a charger (which I doubt is readily available for such
an old phone) it could be long dead by now, and thus not transmitting
anything.

Not even the most efficient digital cell phones will last 29 days on
standby without spending some time plugged into a wall or car socket.

> Cell towers have three antenas and they could easily could use doppler
> effect for direction finding, but I'm not sure if they do.

They can in theory.  But, what MAY be causing the problem is that AMPS
doesn't have any sort of soft-handoff capability, in other words, it has
no ability for a phone to be connected with two or more cell sites to
ease the handoff when an active handset moves during a call.  This is
why when a call was handed off in analog, both parties KNEW and could
tell it was happening.

The AMPS system was very advanced for its day, but quite rudimentary by
current technological standards in that generally one and only one cell
site could be formally connected to a handset at once.  This greatly
limits the possibilities of triangulation.

It also depends largely on how Cingular has their AMPS gear configured.
 I have a feeling they've let the condition of the gear deterioriate
quite a bit to the point where it offers only extrmemely basic features
and service levels to stay "legal" in the eyes of the FCC.  As a result,
they might have removed a lot of the gear that normally would have been
used for this sort of tracking.  They could also be using very few
frequencies for AMPS (bandwidth IS limited on Cingular) and configuring
multiple analog suites to operate in a "zone" fashion rather than by
individual cell site.

> I'm hoping
> someone here with actual experience can answer the question for certain. I
> know of no other place to shop for experts for a second opinion.

Unfortuantely, I don't think we can give you a  definitive answer
without knowing  some inside information on what Cingular has done with
their AMPS network, how it's configured, and what features and
capabilities it still has as opposed to what parts have been left to rot
or been cannibalized for TDMA or GSM.

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

Tom Frey - 27 Aug 2005 19:04 GMT
> > The police are involved guys, she has been missing 29 days. Problem is
> > Cingular is giving the police the same story, and I still don't believe it.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Not even the most efficient digital cell phones will last 29 days on
> standby without spending some time plugged into a wall or car socket.

Prior to the next day the phone had not logged in since 12/29/04, she never
use it. But she did carry a car charger and had be instructed that is was
required for use. We suspect she would have had to plug it in to attempt a
call, and trigger a login at the tower. Cingular has acknowledged the login
at 2:40 pm the next day, but hasn't indicated that a number was dialed. We
wonder if she dialed a number, and didn't remember to press the send key.
They had been notified just three hour or so before that she was missing,
and the police had taken a report and was fully involved. But they did not
report the incident until the second phone request from my brother, some 5
days later.

> > Cell towers have three antenas and they could easily could use doppler
> > effect for direction finding, but I'm not sure if they do.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> capabilities it still has as opposed to what parts have been left to rot
> or been cannibalized for TDMA or GSM.

That's excellent input, and not something we had thought to consider. We
have been afraid their reluctance might be based on the possibility they
might have had the chance to save a life and yet took no action. But
allowing their AMPS equipment to deteriorate might be hampering their own
internal efforts as well. Now I wonder if their reluctance might be based on
allowing their equipment to deteriorate below FCC minimums. Upon conclusion,
we will be filling a formal written with the FCC, and it might be a good
time to pose that suspicion as well.

Thanks so much for taking time to post your ideas.
Thurman - 28 Aug 2005 12:03 GMT
>..snip..
> That's excellent input, and not something we had thought to consider. We
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> we will be filling a formal written with the FCC, and it might be a good
> time to pose that suspicion as well.

I put your questions to a guy that has been awarded five patents covering
>digital< cellular systems. Unfortunately, he doesn't know a lot about
analog systems. But here is additional data points that might be of help:

When a cell phone is turned on, a 'heartbeat' is broadcast to identify the
handset/owner. That information is transmitted over the cellular network
along with the 'tower' data to a database that verifies you are a customer
in good standing.

In the >digital world<, the tower and antenna (horn) ID is transmitted with
other data in a packet. If you knew the actual antenna used at login, you
can estimate a pie slice area from the antenna, limited by the power of the
broadcast of the handset and the terrain.

At worse, in theory, if the antenna were only one of three, you would have a
pie slice ~120 degrees wide and ~five miles radius. That's a big piece of
territory, but smaller than all of NE Oklahoma.
Tom Frey - 28 Aug 2005 21:19 GMT
> >..snip..
> > That's excellent input, and not something we had thought to consider. We
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> pie slice ~120 degrees wide and ~five miles radius. That's a big piece of
> territory, but smaller than all of NE Oklahoma.

You're absolutly right. We have so many towers in the Tulsa area, just
knowing which one did take the login and which other towers would be
applicable, would make all the difference to us right now. We have literally
dozens of volunteers from her 2 church congregations, and family and friends
wanting to help, and have had since day 1. But just knowing it was a Tulsa
tower has proven little help besides limiting the search to a 20 or 25 mile
radius, and we still can't find her. We have so many trees and foilage here,
that a vehicle can be lost from sight just 20' or so off the roadway, and
that doesn't speak for creeks and embankments.

Thanks for your input.
Thurman - 29 Aug 2005 14:53 GMT
>.....
> But just knowing it was a Tulsa
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> that a vehicle can be lost from sight just 20' or so off the roadway, and
> that doesn't speak for creeks and embankments.

Only because efforts so far haven't been fruitful, I'd suggest one more
thing that is on the limit of my knowledge:

Assume there is a chance someone took or found her cell phone. That first
call or sign on could have been someone other than your mother.

I just check my unused ATT analog cell phone to verify it has an ESN:
electronic serial number. My Sprint devices all use the ESN as an
identifier, but Cingular, on digital handsets, use the SIM card for
identification. Someone else needs to verify, but I think the handset
somehow broadcasts the ESN with the SIM ID to set behavior or performance.

Much stolen or found equipment finds it's way to eBay. You would not likely
be able to search on the ESN on eBay, but if the device has been sold and
put in to service, there is remote chance Cingular would have the ESN and
owners name.

Sorry I can't be of more assistance.
Tom Frey - 29 Aug 2005 22:05 GMT
> >.....
> > But just knowing it was a Tulsa
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Sorry I can't be of more assistance.

Thanks Thurman, that might be a good idea if we don't turn something up
soon. However, the phones latest statement was posted to the web late last
week. It covers the 30 day period beginning 2 days before she disappeared.
Although no calls were listed, it did show a charge for one call. The phone
was on a straight rate of 37 cents a minute I believe. When my brother
contacted Cingular about the charge with no calls listed, they admitted a
call to my home phone number was made at 4:55 pm the day after she
disappeared. Since the call was not answered, it was not shown on the bill,
but has now been confirmed. I was in an aircraft searching her nearby home
town at the time. Also my brother confirmed no phone numbers were programmed
into the phone, so it just about had to be her placing the call about 24
hours after she was last seen. No other calls or logins have been admitted
my Cingular as yet.

So it was my brothers phone, and had not logged in since 12/29/04, and the
only call and login made was the day after she disappeared, and was made
trying to contact me. But Cingular still insists they can't help for privacy
reasons, until they get the subpoena they accepted two weeks ago.
Isaiah Beard - 30 Aug 2005 18:50 GMT
> Much stolen or found equipment finds it's way to eBay. You would not likely
> be able to search on the ESN on eBay, but if the device has been sold and
> put in to service, there is remote chance Cingular would have the ESN and
> owners name.

Well, Cigular no longer offers analog service plans, it's highly
unlikely that they will activate an AMPS phone.  What remains of their
AMPS service is reerved mainly for stalwarts who have never upgraded
their phones, for OnStar, and for "last resort" roaming for people with
dual-mode phones.

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

Jer - 31 Aug 2005 00:31 GMT
>> Much stolen or found equipment finds it's way to eBay. You would not
>> likely be able to search on the ESN on eBay, but if the device has
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> their phones, for OnStar, and for "last resort" roaming for people with
> dual-mode phones.

Even Onstar has seen the light.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

John Navas - 30 Aug 2005 20:15 GMT
>You're absolutly right. We have so many towers in the Tulsa area, just
>knowing which one did take the login and which other towers would be
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>that a vehicle can be lost from sight just 20' or so off the roadway, and
>that doesn't speak for creeks and embankments.

You're making the assumption that the closest tower would have handled the
call, thus narrowing your search.  That's not a valid assumption -- AMPS has
considerable range, and a phone might actually use a more distant tower,
depending on a several factors (e.g., terrain, tower capacity).  Thus knowing
the exact tower probably won't give you much (if any) more information than
you have now.

Signature

Best regards,        HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas           <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

sjwilson - 28 Aug 2005 18:53 GMT
I assume that you are speaking with the same person or persons each tim
you call?  Or is it that you are speaking to a different person eac
time?  Also, who are you speaking with -- customer service?  or hav
you gotten beyond them?

Who you talk to is half the battle.  I recommend speaking with 2-
people continuously (any more = chaos, any less = possibility of th
ball dropping).  Also, push and push and push until you get to a to
tier, or someone who has the knowledge to assist you
Jer - 28 Aug 2005 20:44 GMT
> I assume that you are speaking with the same person or persons each time
> you call?  Or is it that you are speaking to a different person each
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ball dropping).  Also, push and push and push until you get to a top
> tier, or someone who has the knowledge to assist you.

Typically, a police department assigns an chief investigator to the
case, and that's the person that runs the show.  That's the same person
he should be talking to.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Tom Frey - 28 Aug 2005 21:25 GMT
> > I assume that you are speaking with the same person or persons each time
> > you call?  Or is it that you are speaking to a different person each
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> case, and that's the person that runs the show.  That's the same person
> he should be talking to.

The detective is certainly in the loop, but having no more luck with
Cingular than we have, he has encouraged us to keep persuing them as well.
He is not at all the narrow minded or controlling type and seems happy to
recieve all the help he can get. But is being hampered by the same subponia
nonsense as everyone else.
Tom Frey - 28 Aug 2005 21:06 GMT
> I assume that you are speaking with the same person or persons each time
> you call?  Or is it that you are speaking to a different person each
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ball dropping).  Also, push and push and push until you get to a top
> tier, or someone who has the knowledge to assist you.

Actually we have just been taking what ever we can get. We just have to coax
what ever we can until they begin insisting on a subponia, and try our luck
with someone else later. I think the detective found out it was a Tulsa
tower through a friend of a friend. Last week someone my brother contacted
indicated it was a Tulsa tower as well, but they were not sure which one.
When a charge for a single phone call showed up on the bill last Thursday,
my brother was finally able to get someone to tell him that is was my home
phone number that was called, but two hours after her phone logged in. But
it seems each contact ends with the insistance for a subponia.

The state's attorney generals office issued a subponia on the 12th, but a
Cingular rep indicated to them three days later (the 15th) during a follow
up call that the subponia had been lost. So the AGs office faxed it to them
three times on the 15th. No news since, but we are hoping for next week.

Seems ironic to us that Cingular's insistance on a subponia has been based
on privacy issues, yet the only call my step mother has made on the phone in
the past 8 years, was an attempt to contact me the day after she
disappeared. And the phone belongs to my brother, the person making all the
inquires.
My brothers first call was to alert them to the situation the very next day,
just 3 hours before the phone logged in.
Jer - 28 Aug 2005 20:42 GMT
>>>The police are involved guys, she has been missing 29 days. Problem is
>>>Cingular is giving the police the same story, and I still don't believe
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
> Thanks so much for taking time to post your ideas.

On a cell phone, a number isn't "dialed" until the Send/Call button is
pressed.  You can punch in all the digits you want, but until the magic
button is pressed, they're just digits held in the phone's memory.  When
the magic moment arrives, the digits are sent all at once.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Jer - 25 Aug 2005 05:27 GMT
> My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
> is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
> think they can, and suspect they can also tell the approximate direction of
> the signal. So I thought I would pose the question here.

Oh, okay... reading further...  Any wireless service provider would be
reluctant to release such info to anyone, including law enforcement,
without a Title 3 warrant.  OTOH, if the situation truly is a life and
death situation, the provider may choose to not wait on a warrant to be
issued to begin data collection, but releasing anything learned would
still require a warrant.

Suppose your step mother had simply decided to step out incognito and
finish her life privately refusing further contact with you or anyone
else she has known?  Sans a warrant, the provider would be seriously
remiss to provide any viable information to you, and in fact, if my
supposition turned out to be accurate, would subject the provider to
actionable offenses of a civil and criminal nature for violating the
privacy rights of your step mother.

There is such a thing as a "welfare" warrant.  It could be used by law
enforcement to contact your step mother on your behalf to determine her
state of mind and intent while keeping her location private.  What I
don't know is whether a welfare warrant qualifies as a Title 3.

Luck in your endeavour.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Tom Frey - 25 Aug 2005 11:53 GMT
Cingular was contacted by my brother, the owner of the phone and account,
about 11a.m. the next day. She turned on phone on just three hours later,
but no calls have been made to date. It was the first time the phone had
been turned on in 7 months, per Cingular. However Cingular never contacted
anyone, and would not admit the phone had been turned on for about 6 more
days, and two more phone calls from my brother.

My step mother would have never gone incognito. Her cherished pets were
abandoned. She was a 40 year founding member of her church yet contacted
neither her sisters or church friends. Her bank account has not been
touched, she kept little cash at home. She would not drive on expressways,
or after dark, and she has always asked to be driven in those instances.

In the past few days a subponia has been issued by the state's Attorney
Generals's Office, although it was my brother's phone, and of course he is
fully cooperating with the family and police.

I'm trying to determine what kind of information could have, or should have
been available the very next day, as well as the days following. In our
opinion, Cingular is clearly not cooperating with anyone, including the
police department, they contacted no one when the phone was turned on.
That's why I am soliciting here for expert opinions, hopefully from persons
familiar with these type of systems, to see what can be done now, or should
have been done the day the phone was turned on.

> > My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
> > is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Luck in your endeavour.
Jer - 25 Aug 2005 16:00 GMT
> Cingular was contacted by my brother, the owner of the phone and account,
> about 11a.m. the next day. She turned on phone on just three hours later,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> familiar with these type of systems, to see what can be done now, or should
> have been done the day the phone was turned on.

Tom I'm trying to empathize with your situation as well as any stranger
can, and I'm certainly don't want to sound like I'm defending Cingular
in particular.  However, Cingular, like any provider, has a office
somewhere (Atlanta?) that serves as a single point-of-contact for this
type of thing (Subpoena Compliance Dept).  Ordinarily, privacy laws and
corporate policies that support them going to require a warrant to
release any info about a customer, so getting law enforcement officially
involved to at least this level should be priority one.  Beyond that,
yes, rules and policies have been bent in the interest of brevity, but
the release of sensitive info will only occur under the highest scrutiny
possible.  In the interest of spreading the wealth, any business that
obtains, records, uses, and retains personally identifiable detailed
information about a customer is held to the same level of
responsibility, ie. financial, medical, municipal, etc.

For your reference:
Title 1 = billing and usage records, ie. historical only
Title 2 = real-time digital data only (digits dialed) and Title 1 above
Title 3 = real-time & record analog data (voice) and Title 1 & 2 above

You'll notice there's no mention of location info, because there's no
current provision in any of the above criminal warrant requirements for
it.  In these circumstances, the term "life or death" emergency are
paramount for action.  Location info has always been provided (within
technological limits) for 911 calls, given the presumptive nature of
calling an emergency number.  Yes, improvements have been made for
homing in on a handset's location, but only if the caller dials 911.
Outside of that event, anything more is a crap shoot, especially when
dealing with Homeland Security.  Keywords = health and welfare

It may also serve to understand that Cingular will only be able to
respond with info gleaned from their own internal systems, other
providers would have to supply their own cards to the table
independently.  Keyword = roaming.

I hope this has been helpful for you in your time of concern.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Tom Frey - 25 Aug 2005 17:33 GMT
I appreciate your input Jer, but that's not really the question. What myself
and the rest of the family is trying to determine is what was then, and is
now, technologically possible.

The owner of the phone (by brother) is the person asking for the
information. Requests for this information has been requested by the police
department with his blessing since day 2.

The police department and state's Attorney General's Office determined a
subponia was the approiate course of action, and was what was stated by
Cingular as being required. I see no need to second guess any of them, but
will certainly keep your suggestions in mind in the event the subponia
doesn't yeild favorable results.

To the best of our knowledge, based on what Cingular has admitted, the login
was received on one of their local towers, so roaming and other shared
services shouldn't be a problem. But at this point, they are telling some of
us they can't determine which tower took the login.

Thanks for your input,
Tom

> > Cingular was contacted by my brother, the owner of the phone and account,
> > about 11a.m. the next day. She turned on phone on just three hours later,
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> I hope this has been helpful for you in your time of concern.
Isaiah Beard - 27 Aug 2005 07:18 GMT
> My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
> is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
> think they can, and suspect they can also tell the approximate direction of
> the signal. So I thought I would pose the question here.

At the very least, they should be able to find out which cell the phone
logged into.  Chances are they won't give YOU that information, but the
they will give it to police, if compelled to do so.

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

Tom Frey - 27 Aug 2005 18:39 GMT
> > My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But Cingular
> > is claiming they can't even tell which of the Tulsa towers took the login. I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> logged into.  Chances are they won't give YOU that information, but the
> they will give it to police, if compelled to do so.

By which cell, do you mean which tower?
The information has been requested by the police department, and is now the
subject of a subponia from the state's attorney generals office. But the
subponia was issued on the 12th, and as of the 26th we were not aware it had
been answered yet.
Jer - 28 Aug 2005 21:01 GMT
>>>My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> subponia was issued on the 12th, and as of the 26th we were not aware it had
> been answered yet.

Ordinarily, when a telecom provider is notified of a warrant (yes, there
is an audit trail), that company has 24 hours to acknowledge receipt of
the warrant.  This acknowledgement does not constitute compliance - it
merely certifies receipt.   However, once that acknowledgement occurs,
that company is encumbered for the duration of it's terms, or has
another 24 hours to file a "no cause" order stipulating why they
can't/shouldn't comply.  The occurance of the latter option is extremely
rare.  Any company encumbered under a warrant is also bound to discuss
it's very existence *only* with the agency that requested the warrant,
and *only* the details related to maintain their compliance.  Trust me,
there are no exceptions.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Tom Frey - 28 Aug 2005 21:35 GMT
> >>>My step mother is missing and her phone logged in the next day. But
> >
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> and *only* the details related to maintain their compliance.  Trust me,
> there are no exceptions.

Actually on a follow up call from the state's attorney general's office on
the 15th, they admitted having lost it (the subponia). It was faxed again
the same day. But as of late last week, or about the 25th or 26th, no one is
aware of their compliance. I talked to the Tulsa detective who is in contact
with the attorney general's office on Friday the 26th, and he still hasn't
received anything. My brother had spoke with a contact in the SGA office
earlier in the week as well.
Jer - 25 Aug 2005 05:11 GMT
> Can a Cingular cell tower record the approximate direction of an old analog
> phone signal?

Of course.  Radio is radio.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Spammer Magnet - 30 Aug 2005 04:33 GMT
Tom,

Check out this Wired magazine article from 11 years ago, especially
page 2 about half way down the page.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.01/phreaks.html

> Can a Cingular cell tower record the approximate direction of an old analog
> phone signal?
Tom Frey - 30 Aug 2005 13:28 GMT
> Tom,
>
> Check out this Wired magazine article from 11 years ago, especially
> page 2 about half way down the page.
>
> http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.01/phreaks.html

Thanks for the reference Spammer, it's certainly a lot of food for thought.
It's a shame you can't find guys like that in the phone book.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.