>>How new? I found a cached copy from May, 2005.
> Link please. I've been searching regularly, and didn't find anything in
> that time frame.
> That is of course meaningless.

Signature
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5
>> dold@XReXXNoXmo.usenet.us.com wrote:
>>>> New webpage <http://www.cingular.com/media/media_legal>:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>What is the oldest that you did find?
Recent.
>In looking agin, I find many June 2005 forum postings, quoting the page.
><http://65.254.44.186/showthread.php?t=65210> is one of them.
I see nothing relevant there, part of VerizonWireless.HowardForums.com
>On page one, there is someone noting that the page changed on Feb 04, 2005,
>with no quote. On page two, there is a quote.
Anonymous anecdotal reports in web forums aren't reliable.
Can you actually point me to a "cached copy from May, 2005?"
>>>I also found mention of the new terminology appearing Jan 2005 in a
>>>howardforum, although there isn't a quote.
>
>> That is of course meaningless.
>
>No it's not. ...
No offense intended, but we'll just to agree to disagree.

Signature
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
dold@XReXXMEdia.usenet.us.com - 29 Sep 2005 18:34 GMT
> dold@XReXXNoXmo.usenet.us.com wrote:
>>When did you first notice the text?
> Just before I posted.
30 minutes after I posted the text in alt.cellular.cingular?
>>You regularly state that there is no prohibition against tethering.
> There wasn't in the past.
How often do you look?
It would be handy to know when it actually changed. One might be
grandfathered if there was a different version at the appropriate time.
>>In looking again, I find many June 2005 forum postings, quoting the page.
>><http://65.254.44.186/showthread.php?t=65210> is one of them.
> I see nothing relevant there, part of VerizonWireless.HowardForums.com
Oops. Dropped a digit when I did the copy. Thread 652106.
http://65.254.44.186/showthread.php?t=652106&page=1&pp=1
I see What purports to be text copied from the page, posted to a forum in
June, that looks just like the text you copied from the page yesterday,
which you suggest is new.
This is

Signature
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5
John Navas - 29 Sep 2005 19:52 GMT
>> dold@XReXXNoXmo.usenet.us.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>30 minutes after I posted the text in alt.cellular.cingular?
1630 on Wed, 28 Sep 2005
>>>You regularly state that there is no prohibition against tethering.
>> There wasn't in the past.
>
>How often do you look?
Every few weeks.
>It would be handy to know when it actually changed. One might be
>grandfathered if there was a different version at the appropriate time.
I carefully archived the Service Agreement and details of my rate plan and
options at the time I started my contract.
>>>In looking again, I find many June 2005 forum postings, quoting the page.
>>><http://65.254.44.186/showthread.php?t=65210> is one of them.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>June, that looks just like the text you copied from the page yesterday,
>which you suggest is new.
While that report might be true, even then it's possible that it wasn't
applicable (visible) to all subscribers and/or in all areas.

Signature
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>