Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Roll over minutes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
T,m - 09 Dec 2005 13:32 GMT
I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to a single line
plan.
My first contact was with email CS.  I was told that I would loose all
rollover
minutes except for an amount equal to the new plan minutes.

When I called 611 to make the changes, I was told the same thing.
Only after I used some words about advertising "It's your minutes, keep
them",
retaining customer loyalty, etc., was I transferred to a specialist that
could make
the changes and keep  my roll over minutes.  Of course, I have not yet seen
the next
bill cycle.

The moral of this story, If the first answer is unacceptable, try, try
again.
Cingular XBM - 09 Dec 2005 16:07 GMT
T,m Wrote:

> Only after I used some words about advertising "It's your minutes
> keep
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Just curious...can you remember if you ever used the word "cancel
> while speaking to either the rep who transfered you or the specialist
frechsm - 09 Dec 2005 16:11 GMT
This is something new that Cingular just started a few months ago. U
until then, if you changed your rate plan from one with rollover t
another with rollover, you kept all of your built up rollover minutes
Now, if you're on a 1500 minute plan and go down to a 500 minute plan
and you have 4500 rollover minutes built up, you only keep 500 of thos
4500.

They must have a reason for it, though
nic_hitchins - 09 Dec 2005 21:52 GMT
frechsm Wrote:
> This is something new that Cingular just started a few months ago. U
> until then, if you changed your rate plan from one with rollover t
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> They must have a reason for it, though.

yeah, i seem to remember a rep saying that if you ever find that you'r
not using all of your minutes to drop down a step in plans.  you'd kee
your rollover mins.  then if you started needing more minutes, bum
yourself back up.

it could be the guy just trying to make a sale, but it sounded like
manual version of the sprint flexible plan.

xbm, you know about this
Wayne - 09 Dec 2005 23:55 GMT
Reason for it?  Profits.  You paid for what you will not be using.  The
higher the profits, the higher Mr. Stanley Sigman's bonus.

> This is something new that Cingular just started a few months ago. Up
> until then, if you changed your rate plan from one with rollover to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> They must have a reason for it, though.
John Navas - 13 Dec 2005 05:29 GMT
>This is something new that Cingular just started a few months ago. Up
>until then, if you changed your rate plan from one with rollover to
>another with rollover, you kept all of your built up rollover minutes.
>Now, if you're on a 1500 minute plan and go down to a 500 minute plan,
>and you have 4500 rollover minutes built up, you only keep 500 of those
>4500.

I don't think Cingular has the right to do that retroactively.  For new
Rollover minutes, but not for those you've banked before the change came into
effect.

>They must have a reason for it, though.

Probably because some people were gaming the system:  Sign up for a huge
amount of cheap minutes, bank them in Rollover, drop down to a cheap plan to
use up the cheap Rollover minutes, and repeat.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Aaron - 13 Dec 2005 08:45 GMT
> I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to a single line
> plan.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The moral of this story, If the first answer is unacceptable, try, try
> again.

im sure while switching to a new single plan you signed a new 2 year
contract..
i dont see why anyone would sign a 2 year contract its plain stupid.
John Navas - 13 Dec 2005 14:56 GMT
>> I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to a single line
>> plan.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>contract..
>i dont see why anyone would sign a 2 year contract its plain stupid.

You only need a new contract extension if you go for current promotions, not
just switching rate plans.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

T,m - 13 Dec 2005 14:58 GMT
I was born at night, but, not last night. no way did I commit to a new
contract.

>> I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to a single line
>> plan.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> contract..
> i dont see why anyone would sign a 2 year contract its plain stupid.
SMS - 13 Dec 2005 15:22 GMT
> im sure while switching to a new single plan you signed a new 2 year
> contract..
> i dont see why anyone would sign a 2 year contract its plain stupid.

It's a gamble based on whether you believe that you'll want to stick
with the carrier long enough for the phone subsidy to be more than the
ETF should you decide to leave. If you're on a very good grandfathered
plan, it's very likely that you're going to stick with the same carrier
for the long term, so the risk of a contract extension is low.

Some people extend the contract to get a new phone, with the express
intention of reselling the new phone, and keeping their old phone.
Bob - 13 Dec 2005 16:37 GMT
What is interesting is that I have dropped my plans down to lower
amounts of minutes twice since they have started telling people about
only keeping as many rollover minutes as the plan you are switching to,
and have kept all my minutes.  So far I've been able to keep my "bank"
of accumlated minutes since my account started.
Salt-peder - 19 Dec 2005 00:52 GMT
QUOTE - I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to
single line plan.  My first contact was with CS.  I was told that
would loose all rollover minutes except for an amount equal to the ne
plan minutes.

I am a North Carolina Cingular customer since *1998 * (first wa
Bellsouth).  I did the same as quoted above recently - I was told I wa
going to loose my rollover minutes, but if I went back under contrac
for 11 months, I could retain these minutes (6700 minutes - crazy,
know).  The primary line was a business line that has not been use
lately, and then moved to another carrier, resulting in high rollove
accumilation.  

I waited 2 - 3 months for my rollover minutes to appear on the account
but they never did.  Upon contact last week with Cingular, they informe
me that I never had to go under contract to get my rollover minutes.  I
took 45 minutes for them to "find" my lost minutes.  I was als
chastized for "waiting so long" to contact them regarding my concern.

I am TERRIBLY upset since I did not want to go back under contract -
have argued that Cingular told me wrong information and thus I shoul
not be under contract.  They state that I was never told what I hear
and I have agreed to the contract.  They refuse to relent on th
contract.  So much for me being a loyal customer for so long!!!  It ha
gained me nothing - I purchased my own Treo 180's from e-Bay that I use
for years - NEVER got their phones or anything that incurred extra cos
to them.

I AM SO UPSET NOW, ALL I WANT TO DO IS GET AWAY FROM CINGULAR FOREVER.
CAN ANYONE PLEASE HELP???  I NEED ASSISTANCE, AS WELL AS CINGULA
CORPORATE ADDRESS AND LEGAL CONTACT INFO!!!

Links to other helpful posts would be appreciated as well
Tstright - 19 Dec 2005 02:11 GMT
Salt-peder Wrote:
> QUOTE - I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to
> single line plan.  My first contact was with CS.  I was told that
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Links to other helpful posts would be appreciated as well..

Pay the ETF and walk, It's that simple
Salt-peder - 19 Dec 2005 22:32 GMT
Tstright Wrote:
> .
> Pay the ETF and walk, It's that simple.

And unfortunately, that is what I will probably do.  It is unfortunat
to end a historically good business arrangement on such negative terms
7 years with the same carrier means we both benefited for some time.

I just feel a need to make corporate and legal dept. aware of how th
public is treated, and finding any contact information for eithe
(especially legal) is very difficult.  A contract is a 2 part
agreement, and when it seems to be a one way street, something seem
wrong ...
dold@XReXXRollX.usenet.us.com - 19 Dec 2005 23:04 GMT
> And unfortunately, that is what I will probably do.  It is unfortunate
> to end a historically good business arrangement on such negative terms.
> 7 years with the same carrier means we both benefited for some time.

You have an 11 month contract that is already partially gone, so a few
months remaining.

You're going to break the contract and pay an ETF just because you don't
want to be under contract?

Is there something wrong with the plan or service, other than you are
upset about how you got tied to the contract?

Is someone going to care if you cancel and walk away?
Are you trying to prove a point?

What am I missing?

Signature

---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA  38.8,-122.5

Salt-peder - 19 Dec 2005 23:52 GMT
dold@XReXXRollX.usenet.us.com Wrote:

> Is there something wrong with the plan or service, other than you are
> upset about how you got tied to the contract?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What am I missing?

"Shrugging Smile" - Yes, you have unfortunately found one of m
greatest character flaws.  It IS somewhat about the principle of th
thing.  Had I not been told that I did not NEED to be under contract
it may be different.  Why should I be under contract?!?!?  I was tol
that I went under contract for no reason, so, okay, just get rid of th
contract.  Do principles mean nothing to us anymore?  Not really whe
you talk about Wal-Mart and large business vs the little guy.

Will anyone care?  No they will not.  Disappointing part of busines
today.  I am a business owner that still operates a lot by a handshak
and my word.  Believe it or not, a lot is still done in the old Sout
this way (by older people mostly).  Life is so different when you shak
someones hand and make promises and things happen.  Unfortunately, mos
things cannot be done this way now.  Unfortunately, I also have bee
forced to use contracts to protect my interests (as well as the client
by the way).  Some folks just won't engage you without one, and that i
okay this day and age ...

Unfortunately, I made a verbal contract on the phone that I received n
paperwork for ...  and now it is my word against .... the Gian
Corporate Entity
dold@XReXXRollX.usenet.us.com - 20 Dec 2005 00:25 GMT
> dold@XReXXRollX.usenet.us.com Wrote:
> > Are you trying to prove a point?

> "Shrugging Smile" - Yes, you have unfortunately found one of my

> today.  I am a business owner that still operates a lot by a handshake
> and my word.  Believe it or not, a lot is still done in the old South

Just checking.  I do work by and for verbal contract.
But Cingular and its minions do not.

They have locked you into the monthly plan that you wanted anyway.
I felt like that when I signed the two year contract in the first place.
I needed the service for the next two years.  They gave me a phone.

Signature

---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA  38.8,-122.5

John Navas - 20 Dec 2005 02:50 GMT
>Unfortunately, I made a verbal contract on the phone that I received no
>paperwork for ...  and now it is my word against .... the Giant
>Corporate Entity.

Your call was probably recorded.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas - 20 Dec 2005 02:52 GMT
>Tstright Wrote:
>> .
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>public is treated, and finding any contact information for either
>(especially legal) is very difficult.  ...

Not hard at all -- that information is in the Cingular FAQ below.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Marty - 19 Dec 2005 22:15 GMT
Somewhere around Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:52:00 -0600, while reading
alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from Salt-peder
<Salt-peder.209ihy@nospam.cellphoneforums.net>:

>I am TERRIBLY upset since I did not want to go back under contract - I
>have argued that Cingular told me wrong information and thus I should
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>for years - NEVER got their phones or anything that incurred extra cost
>to them.

Call back, preferably during the day (seems like they might have better
support during normal hours).  

If you truly think you are right (and it sounds like you are), nicely
explain the situation without being belligerent, and treat the person at the
other end like they are a fellow human being (because they are), and nicely
try to get them to help you, simply because they should.  Don't get angry if
they don't immediately - they may misunderstand at first.

If they don't seem cooperative, thank them, end the call, and call back
later.  You'll probably get someone better next time.

I can't see why they would expect you to sign a contract for no reason.  If
it's true, I think they will see it the same way.  They are human, and they
only work for Cingular; they don't expect you or anyone to give anything
unnecessarily, I can guarantee that.  But if you come off with an attitude
right off the bat, they will resent it.  Just like you probably would.

Try it, and I think you will find that they are mostly nice people.  At
least, that's always been my experience.
Signature

Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others."   - Groucho Marx

Salt-peder - 19 Dec 2005 22:57 GMT
Marty Wrote:
> Call back, preferably during the day (seems like they might have bette
> support during normal hours).
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> At
> least, that's always been my experience.

Marty,
Thanks for your input - this is how it has been handled already ..
somewhat.  I called during the middle of the day.  When I experience
problems, you are right, I should have called back and got another rep
I did not.  I calmly worked with the first level rep. and never lost m
cool with her.  I stated to her that I understood that she could no
make such a decision about "breaking" a contract, so please forward m
to a manager.  Upon going throught the same speech with the manage
several times and getting nowhere, I did begin to get heated when th
circle kept going around " You have make a verbally binding lega
contract".  Yes, I my volume did increase when she questioned me abou
why it had taken so long to call concerning the problem.  Wha
DIFFERENCE does that make?!?  I had been on the phone for over 1 hou
at this point (phone counters are so nice).  I am so disappointed tha
I did not record the call.  It would have provided a full account o
the time spent on the phone for future use if needed. As it is, it i
like the first call where I was told incorrect information - TH
COMPANY IS ALWAYS RIGHT AND THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS WRONG.

I went down to my local Cingular office to speak to someone in perso
and get some different phone #'s/ addresses.  The rep. pulled up m
account and my "rap sheet" was several pages long (and after 7 years
it should be I guess).  Apparently I did get the fingers typing prett
hard from the manager (I could hear it), especially when I told her
would do all I could to downgrade Cingular in the future to anyone wh
asked my input.  I asked if I could get a printout of the notes.  H
stated it was proprietary information (didn't surprise me).

So, have I shot myself in the foot, probably so ... but, again, after
years, I had really hoped that good prompt payment of $60.00
$120.00/month would have meant something ... apparently not :
DecaturTxCowboy - 20 Dec 2005 00:39 GMT
> THE COMPANY IS ALWAYS RIGHT AND THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS WRONG.

"Now you get it"  <-- from the Collection of Responses Towards John
Navas list.
Marty - 21 Dec 2005 21:36 GMT
Somewhere around Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:57:09 -0600, while reading
alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from Salt-peder
<Salt-peder.20b7ly@nospam.cellphoneforums.net>:

>Marty,
>Thanks for your input - this is how it has been handled already ...
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>years, I had really hoped that good prompt payment of $60.00 -
>$120.00/month would have meant something ... apparently not :(

What if you simply admit to them that they are right, you waited too long,
but you were busy and simply didn't get around to it.  And yes, they are
right, you agreed to the contract, but you weren't aware of all the facts
(or were temporarily insane at the time).  And you're not planning to leave,
but you may have to move in the future, and you don't want to have to
possibly break the contract in the future.

Or ask them what you got out of signing the contract.  It seems like a
contract isn't much good if both parties don't get some benefit.  If they
see that you got nothing, maybe they'll be more willing to do something to
make it right.  They might be missing the point, and think that you got a
free phone or something, and are overlooking the facts.  I really find it
hard to believe that more than a small percentage of people would look at
these facts and not see that it's unfair to you.

I understand how you feel, but don't let your principles get in your way too
much if the only casualty is going to be yourself.  And definitely, don't
cop an attitude, and remember that each person you talk to is a potential
ally, and not the cause of your problem.

Signature

Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others."   - Groucho Marx

Salt-peder - 21 Dec 2005 22:16 GMT
Marty Wrote:
> What if you simply admit to them that they are right, you waited to
> long, but you were busy and simply didn't get around to it.  And yes
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> potential
> ally, and not the cause of your problem.

I have followed advice from John Navas and called 611 and asked t
speak to the escalations department.  I got nowhere with them.  I (an
they) were extremely calm, methodical and both parties analyzed wha
has gone on.  They told me:
1) when I pleaded that they review recorded the conversation from m
first call to see what was said - "we can only do that through cour
subpoena brought on by your attorney"
2) when I asked what I got out of the contract, I was told "service"
3) when I pointed out that I have never gotten a phone from Cingular
incurring extra cost from them, they said "that is correct"
4)
A) I was told that the original rep. months ago apparently did no
explain things to me very well.
B) The manager that I spoke to last week gave me wrong information an
that I DID have to go back under contract to get rollover minute
applied to my second #.  I expressed my dissapointment that managemen
is not familiar with their product.

I told the rep. "Thank you, I cannot wait for my contract to expire s
that changes can be made".  We both said goodbye very courteously an
the call was ended.

Escalations department was no help at all and I feel did whatever the
could to short cycle my concern  (contract to get rollover minutes).

David's little slingshot is having no effect on Goliath
Marty - 22 Dec 2005 01:21 GMT
Somewhere around Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:16:53 -0600, while reading
alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from Salt-peder
<Salt-peder.20evjy@nospam.cellphoneforums.net>:

>I have followed advice from John Navas and called 611 and asked to
>speak to the escalations department.  I got nowhere with them.  I (and
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>David's little slingshot is having no effect on Goliath.

Sorry to hear that.  I've never escalated anything, and that may be an
advantage.  It could be that that dept is more public, and can't do as much
without worrying about stepping on someone's toes, or raising alarms that
might cause someone to question their judgement. This is all guesswork on my
part, not fact.

One thing I would have asked about #2 is what *extra* you got out of the
contract, since you already had service, and presumably you were not about
to lose it.  

To tell the truth, I don't think escalating is a good idea; I usually go to
letter writing if I don't get what I want after a few calls.  With letters,
you have copies which can later be sent to people like the PUC or whoever
handles it in your state.  Also, you can send copies to higher ups in
management.

Signature

Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others."   - Groucho Marx

Salt-peder - 22 Dec 2005 15:25 GMT
Marty Wrote:
> One thing I would have asked about #2 is what *extra* you got out of th
> contract, since you already had service, and presumably you were no
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> handles it in your state.  Also, you can send copies to higher ups in
> management.

Cingular service seems to be at an all time low in my area of coasta
NC.  I do not know how it could get worse through time (probably m
imagination) but there are too many dead areas that I drive through fo
1.5 HOURS (not my imagination) that other carriers have better coverag
in.  This was learned in a recent job change in the past 2 years tha
had me travelling in areas that I typically do not work in.  My ne
company (and me) became frustrated with not being able to be in contac
and had my primary number ported over to another carrier.  Secondar
line (wife's phone) has acceptable service in town.

I did have a funny instance some time ago - upon returning fro
Ocracoke Island, North Carolina, I had $75.00 of phone bills for lon
distance charges.  Ocracoke is in the middle of the NC coast (where
had service if I stood outside on the west side of the house and had m
head pointed N-NE).  My plan states that I have NC coverage with n
roaming, so I called customer service and explained it to them.  Rep
stated that Ocracoke was not in NC.  They LITERALLY had to get a ma
out to find out that it is (this is okay, Ocracoke is a small place)
but they did finally take the charges off.  Time cost - 45 minutes o
$60.00 of my worktime (not the funny part).

Yes, I have service, if you can call it that ..
John Navas - 19 Dec 2005 22:32 GMT
See "How Can a Billing or Contract Problem be Resolved?" in the FAQ below.

>QUOTE - I needed to drop an unused family talk number and revert to a
>single line plan.  My first contact was with CS.  I was told that I
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>Links to other helpful posts would be appreciated as well.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.