Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / December 2005
Interesting experience with Cingular customer service...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Marty - 16 Dec 2005 00:05 GMT I had an interesting experience recently (I thought).
My teenaged son was messing around with his phone, and got the prompt to enter his PUK code - I think he was messing around with passwords, and forgot his. So, being a typical teenager (or maybe thinking it was the same as his password), he tried enought times to guess it that he locked himself out of the SIM card.
I called Cingular at night, and got someone that said we needed to buy a new SIM card, and pay $25. I mentioned that I had gotten a new 64K SIM, but not him, and the rep said to ask at the store, and maybe they would give us one for free. OK, not the best solution to me, but I couldn't legitimately demand anything more.
The next day, I called again. This time, I explained what happened (and I had a better idea what actually did happen), and asked if I could get the new 64K sim card sooner rather than later. This agent put me on hold after apologizing for having to do this, ordered the card, and told me I should get it in a few days - no charge. When I got a tracking number, I see that two of them (one for my wife, also) were shipped 2-day FedEx.
I don't know if it's that they have better support during the day, or the fact that I asked for what I wanted right off, but it shows that sometimes patience and politeness can get you what you want.
Some might say they should always give better support, but my experience is that even the best companies sometimes have people that don't do a good job at some times - either thay are having a bad day, or not thinking clearly, or maybe even not suited for the job.
So, my advice for the day is to remember that the person on the phone is a human being, and subject to the same imperfections as anyone else. And don't expect a bad experience when you need to call, or you might get what you expect.
Sorry if this post isn't up to the usual newsgroup standards of bitching and trolling. I'm not trying to say Cingular is good or bad, just that they aren't always one or the other, like most companies.
 Signature Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
SMS - 16 Dec 2005 00:37 GMT > I don't know if it's that they have better support during the day, or the > fact that I asked for what I wanted right off, but it shows that sometimes > patience and politeness can get you what you want. I agree. There is no upside to losing your temper, or using obscenities, etc. Sometimes nothing can be done no matter what, but often the customer service person has a little leeway. Politely asking to speak to a supervisor sometimes helps as well. I never had any problem with Cingular Customer Service, even when their network was hopelessly bad. When I finally canceled, on my one year anniversary, they were very polite, even explaining why their network was so much worse than the AT&T and Verizon network.
Mike S. - 16 Dec 2005 01:36 GMT >I had an interesting experience recently (I thought). > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >for free. OK, not the best solution to me, but I couldn't legitimately >demand anything more. What's wrong with just asking for the PUK code? That would fix your problem immediately, on the spot. No trip to store, no $25.
Marty - 16 Dec 2005 18:37 GMT Somewhere around Fri, 16 Dec 2005 01:36:51 +0000 (UTC), while reading alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from retsuhcs@xinap.moc (Mike S.):
>>I had an interesting experience recently (I thought). >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >What's wrong with just asking for the PUK code? That would fix your >problem immediately, on the spot. No trip to store, no $25. Sorry, perhaps my explanation wasn't clear enough.
If you are asked for your PUK code, you are supposed to stop, contact Cingular, and get the code. But if you are a teenager, and you don't really know what you are doing, you might not realize that it isn't the same as your security setting you're trying to remember. If you enter the wrong PUK code a certain number of times, you get locked out permanently, and need a new card. This is actually what the phone manual says, and Cingular confirmed this.
So, I could ask for the code, but it was too late to actually get it.
 Signature Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
Aaron - 16 Dec 2005 04:20 GMT > I had an interesting experience recently (I thought). > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > trolling. I'm not trying to say Cingular is good or bad, just that they > aren't always one or the other, like most companies. most of the time if you would have went to a corp owned store they would give you the sime card. ive never payed for any sim cards and ive lost my phone about 10 times. just go in, say you need a new sim card. that simple.
Marty - 16 Dec 2005 18:41 GMT Somewhere around Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:20:33 -0800, while reading alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from "Aaron" <aarons6@hotmail.com>:
>> I had an interesting experience recently (I thought). >> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] >ive never payed for any sim cards and ive lost my phone about 10 times. >just go in, say you need a new sim card. that simple. That could be; but it's not very convenient for me to get to a store during the day; most of the ones nearby are closed fairly early, and when I have gone to a store, I usually have to wait a while to get anything. So, they saved me a bit of time during the busy Christmas season, which was pretty nice of them.
 Signature Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
John Navas - 16 Dec 2005 11:05 GMT Good advice. I use the Rule of Three with Cingular, calling back twice to verify anything I hear on the first call. It's a little extra hassle, but has been invaluable in getting past bad information on the first call. First tier phone reps don't seem to be getting thorough training, and some of them seem to have a bad habit of making things up. Also, it helps to be polite -- screaming and yelling only makes things worse.
>I had an interesting experience recently (I thought). > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >trolling. I'm not trying to say Cingular is good or bad, just that they >aren't always one or the other, like most companies.
 Signature Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
Marty - 16 Dec 2005 18:47 GMT Somewhere around Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:05:27 GMT, while reading alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com>:
>Good advice. I use the Rule of Three with Cingular, calling back twice to >verify anything I hear on the first call. It's a little extra hassle, but has >been invaluable in getting past bad information on the first call. First tier >phone reps don't seem to be getting thorough training, and some of them seem >to have a bad habit of making things up. Also, it helps to be polite -- >screaming and yelling only makes things worse. I agree about the polite part. I have s theory that most people I talk to don't understand. When I get told something that I feel is not right, I don't blame the messenger (even if it might be their fault). I try to make the person part of the solution rather than the problem. Something like saying "How can we get around this", or "That doesn't seem right, isn't there some way to fix it?" I basically treat them as an accomplish rather than an enemy. It usually works. Occasionally not, but then I retreat and try other methods.
Sure, there are a few failures here and there, but not like some people seem to have.
 Signature Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
bamp - 16 Dec 2005 19:48 GMT > Good advice. I use the Rule of Three with Cingular, calling back twice to > verify anything I hear on the first call. It's a little extra hassle, but [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > In <j904q1t41c06bl9c7bg7ivtais2p7poqnb@4ax.com> on Thu, 15 Dec 2005 > 16:05:27 John, You're top posting again. <giggle>
.. bamp
>>I had an interesting experience recently (I thought). >> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] >>trolling. I'm not trying to say Cingular is good or bad, just that they >>aren't always one or the other, like most companies.
|
|
|