Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Wire Tapping" Phone Conversations?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
(PeteCresswell) - 27 Jan 2006 00:06 GMT
In the news media I keep on seeing/hearing the phrase "Wire Tapping" in the
context of the current issue about NSA doing same without warrants  - as if some
guys were plugging into people's phone lines and recording the conversation as
on a recent cover of "The Week" mag.

Doesn't make sense to me.

First, if they knew in advance who was calling who they'd just get a FISA
warrant within the 72-hour period and avoid controversy.

I think it's more like they don't know in advance who they want to listen to and
they want to troll for suspicious conversations - not knowing in advance who is
talking to who.

To make it realistic in term of man hours spent I'd think they'd be running
thousands of phone conversations through some sort of keyword-sensitive software
and then flagging the "interesting" ones for human intervention.

If that's the case, it would seem like the logical corollary of that is that
*all* potentially-interesting phone conversations exist in their entirety on
some sort of digital media for some time period - to allow the high-volume
automated review - the question being what the bounds of "interesting" are.

Anybody actually know how it's done?
Signature

PeteCresswell

Merlin - 27 Jan 2006 01:56 GMT
>Anybody actually know how it's done?

Not directly of course, but further speculation:
It's likely they can analyze easily call completion records - what
number you dialed, or, what numbers dialed you. Doesn't matter, cell
phone, fixed land phone, etc.

All calls these days become digital, even if you still have copper at
the home.

I would suspect after identifying a phone number(s) of interest, THEN
the audio/ contents of the calls would begin to be monitored.

For argument:
    Call only numbers in your town - no interest
    Call a number in Afghanistan - potentially of interest.

Or

    Call a supected "terror cell" member, or get a call from same
- even a wrong number - and now your calls may of interest.
Jer - 27 Jan 2006 04:06 GMT
>>Anybody actually know how it's done?
>
> Not directly of course, but further speculation:
> It's likely they can analyze easily call completion records - what
> number you dialed, or, what numbers dialed you. Doesn't matter, cell
> phone, fixed land phone, etc.

Requires a Title 1 warrant, ie. historical records.

> All calls these days become digital, even if you still have copper at
> the home.

Irrelevant

> I would suspect after identifying a phone number(s) of interest, THEN
> the audio/ contents of the calls would begin to be monitored.

Requires a Title 3 warrant, ie. analog data collection.

> For argument:
>     Call only numbers in your town - no interest
>     Call a number in Afghanistan - potentially of interest.

Beyond the bounds of reasonable suspicion.

> Or
>
>     Call a supected "terror cell" member, or get a call from same
> - even a wrong number - and now your calls may of interest.

Now you've got reasonable suspicion.  Go for it, so long as you have a
warrant.

Oh, and a Title 2 warrant is required to do a live collection on call
completion and call routing signals, ie. digital data collection.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

John Navas - 27 Jan 2006 02:14 GMT
>In the news media I keep on seeing/hearing the phrase "Wire Tapping" in the
>context of the current issue about NSA doing same without warrants  - as if some
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>Anybody actually know how it's done?

Good guess.  It's commonly called Echelon.  <http://www.echelonwatch.org/>
See also <http://duncan.gn.apc.org/echelon-dc.htm>
Very scary stuff that's gotten way too little public attention up to now.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

DecaturTxCowboy - 27 Jan 2006 06:14 GMT
> Good guess.  It's commonly called Echelon.  

Old news...
John Navas - 27 Jan 2006 07:22 GMT
>> Good guess.  It's commonly called Echelon.  
>
>Old news...

Thanks for sharing.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Elmo P. Shagnasty - 27 Jan 2006 11:20 GMT
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks for sharing.

You just can't get enough of yourself, can you, Navas?
DecaturTxCowboy - 27 Jan 2006 12:40 GMT
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks for sharing.

"No problemo..."  <-- Arnold Schwarzenegger, "Terminator I", circa 1984
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.