Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / February 2006
Why did store manager keep phone?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ron - 18 Feb 2006 20:22 GMT I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info from it. I put a sign on my house and posted a note on a town Yahoo list. No takers. The phone said "Cingular" on it, so I took it to the nearest dealer, asked them to charge it a bit so I could get the number. Turns out it was the manager who waited on me. He said he can find the owner without charging it. He took the battery out, and using info that was inside, looked up the owner on the computer. Using a speakerphone, he called who he said was the registered owner. Got an answering machine. He left msg to effect that the phone was found and is at the store and they could call to claim it. But he didn't give them my name or number. I wanted the neighbor to know who found it, and I also figured the phone was mine if no one actually claimed it. I asked for it back and told him to give them my number if they called. He refused. We argued. He kept giving me a line about how the owner was a Cingular customer and he would make sure they got the phone. When I argued that I wanted to do that, that I wanted to close the loop myself, and that frankly I trusted myself to do it better than I trusted him, he said let's call the police and have them settle it. He disappeared into the back. I waited 10 minutes and he didn't return. Finally I sent msg in with another employee to write me a receipt for the phone - something he'd offered to do earlier. I waited another 5 minutes. No receipt, no reappearance of manager. I finally left, which I guess is what he wanted me to do.
I could have taken that phone somewhere else, got it charged, found owner and returned it myself. I just happened to take it to a Cingular dealership, and instead of accomplishing a good deed, ended up being hassled by the store manager. Maybe someone wiser than I in the ways of the cell phone business can explain what was going on. Is it possible he wants to recycle the phone into their business if it is not claimed? I can't think of any other reason he would insist on keeping it.
Ron - 18 Feb 2006 22:17 GMT To answer my own post: just got call from rightful owner. He was at the Cingular store and called to say thanks. He was not a neighbor but a township employee - snowplow operator. He had plowed my neighborhood during NYC blizzard of Feb 12. Phone must have been under huge snowbank for a week or so, and surfaced as the snow melted.
Still don't understand why the store manager chose to handle it that way, but I guess my paranoia boiled over at his attitude. Probably also, I was influenced by my own experience some years ago of recovering my own lost phone simply by calling it. (It was in my school's shuttle van.) I figured this was a sort of reverse case scenario. Anyway, glad the owner got his phone back.
ditinsta - 19 Feb 2006 22:55 GMT You told Cingular you wanted to find the owner of the phone. Cingular told you they could easily find the owner and contact them. You admitted it wasn't your phone and Cingular took good care of their customer. I'n not sure what your problem is?
> Still don't understand why the store manager chose to handle it that way, > but I guess my paranoia boiled over at his attitude. Ron - 19 Feb 2006 23:41 GMT No problem, except that the store manager's behavior aggravated me. I had already put in some time trying to find the owner myself, and I wanted to finish it myself. I thought it might be a neighbor, and I also was curious to learn exactly how the phone happened to land on my front walk. I had possession of the phone. It wasn't mine, but it wasn't Cingular's either. Yet the manager physically took it from me and refused to return it. (He never cited "policy" btw) I find that to be strange behavior. Apparently you don't. No matter, the owner has his phone, and, because he chose to notify me, I know the story.
> You told Cingular you wanted to find the owner of the phone. Cingular told > you they could easily find the owner and contact them. You admitted it > wasn't your phone and Cingular took good care of their customer. I'n not > sure what your problem is? subdude - 20 Feb 2006 15:06 GMT >You told Cingular you wanted to find the owner of the phone. Cingular told >you they could easily find the owner and contact them. You admitted it >wasn't your phone and Cingular took good care of their customer. I'n not >sure what your problem is? The manager did what he was supposed to do, and what company policy dictated.
It seems Ron's problem was that it just wasn't enough to do a nice thing for someone and feel good about it privately - he wanted his 'due' (personal gratitude, reward, whatever).
Now all of the group knows what a "great guy" you are, so hopefully you're happy with your 15 minutes of fame....
Marty - 21 Feb 2006 20:29 GMT Somewhere around Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:06:14 GMT, while reading alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from subdude <subdude2REMOVETOREPLY@hotmail.com>:
>>You told Cingular you wanted to find the owner of the phone. Cingular told >>you they could easily find the owner and contact them. You admitted it [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Now all of the group knows what a "great guy" you are, so hopefully >you're happy with your 15 minutes of fame.... You seem to have missed part of the point - what if nobody claimed it? Wouldn't it then belong to whoever found it?
What if the guy who lost it wanted to reward the person who found it, spent time looking for the rightful owner, etc? Why should the store owner get the possible reward, or even appreciation, while the person who spent the most energy gets nothing?
Ron spent his time to go to this store to turn it in, and the manager acted like he stole it or something. I don't think the problem is with Ron, I think the store manager was a jerk.
 Signature Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
Your Name Here - 18 Feb 2006 23:54 GMT Dont feel bad or what ever you feel ever since the local store manager in my area told me that his PTT was faster than NEXTEL ("which I had for a brief period of time") and argued with him and than said lets prove it, and he LOST and lost in his own store and packed easily 12 to 14 customers with every one watching and him mumbling that Nextel beat his PTT, since that evening when I go in there he will NOT come out of his office or hides in the back.
The guy is actually cool and very knowledgeable just ran his MOUTH too much and more or less had his face slapped and slapped good.
> I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a > neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > he wants to recycle the phone into their business if it is not > claimed? I can't think of any other reason he would insist on keeping it. Andy S - 19 Feb 2006 04:07 GMT >I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a >neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info from [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > wants to recycle the phone into their business if it is not claimed? I > can't think of any other reason he would insist on keeping it. Manager kept phone because that's policy. You found the phone took it to Cingular and that should have been it. How is the manager to know that you aren't just trying to get a free phone out of this?
 Signature Andrew D. Sisson LG VX8100 VZW<BAM<FRONTIER CELLULAR<ROCHESTER TEL. MOBILE SID 154 EV-DO PRL 50463 SINCE APRIL 1993
Jer - 19 Feb 2006 13:39 GMT >>I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a >>neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info from [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > should have been it. How is the manager to know that you aren't just > trying to get a free phone out of this? Nobody knows who thought what nor when... Ron got his Really Good Guy Glory badge after all was said and done, and that's all he needed.
 Signature jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'
Richard - 19 Feb 2006 14:46 GMT I found a phone in a taxi and took it to Verizon and told them that I had found the phone and was trying to return it to its owner. He said its plan had been canceled and did I want to use it. I said I did. . It seemed that he couldn't care less who owned it. He just wanted to make sure it was on an active plan.That was my first cell phone.
>>I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a >>neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > should have been it. How is the manager to know that you aren't just > trying to get a free phone out of this? tom glaab - 21 Feb 2006 13:02 GMT > Maybe someone wiser than I in the ways of the cell > phone business can explain what was going on. ... I can't think > of any other reason he would insist on keeping it. Perhaps Cingular tagged you as the "cell phone stalker," a deviant who steals cell phones then uses Customer Service to lead him to his victims' homes. Perhaps the computer noted that the phone's owner was your ex-boyfriend who has a restraining order against you.
Personally I'd be rather annoyed if Cingular started sending total strangers to my home. I'd much rather they act as a trusted agent to relay the phone to me (as this manager did).
tg.
subdude - 21 Feb 2006 15:10 GMT >> Maybe someone wiser than I in the ways of the cell >> phone business can explain what was going on. ... I can't think [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >tg. Excellent, albeit scary, thought.
Jer - 21 Feb 2006 16:44 GMT >>>Maybe someone wiser than I in the ways of the cell >>>phone business can explain what was going on. ... I can't think [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Excellent, albeit scary, thought. Considering the recent spate of news stories related to identity theft and/or fraud via cell phone records, sounds like this store manager has been reading his corporate email blog about using prudence when dealing with customer records. IOW, he did the right thing for all the right reasons. Kudos to him for giving a sh.t.
 Signature jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'
Marty - 21 Feb 2006 20:34 GMT Somewhere around Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:44:34 -0600, while reading alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten>:
>>>>Maybe someone wiser than I in the ways of the cell >>>>phone business can explain what was going on. ... I can't think [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >with customer records. IOW, he did the right thing for all the right >reasons. Kudos to him for giving a sh.t. Perhaps, but Ron never asked for the information, he only wanted to charge the phone, probably in case the owner called. I once found a phone, and the owner did call, and I met him close by to return it.
If someone is a stalker or whatever, he's probably not going to a Cingular store to have it charged.
Besides, maybe the owner was a stalker. :)
I usually like to ask myself "What would Jesus do in a case like this?" But then I decided Jesus probably didn't have a cell phone.
 Signature Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
Ron - 21 Feb 2006 23:37 GMT >>Considering the recent spate of news stories related to identity theft >>and/or fraud via cell phone records, sounds like this store manager has [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Perhaps, but Ron never asked for the information, he only wanted to charge > the phone, probably in case the owner called. Correct. As stated above, that's how I recovered my own (Verizon) phone one time. Or if the found phone's own number were somewhere evident in there, I'd have left a msg on the voice mail telling owner how to contact me. As I think I mentioned above, I never wanted the owner's personal info. I just wanted the Cingular manager to act as a conduit. BTW - to the posters who think I wanted "glory" - I had my 15 minutes of fame decades ago. It's over-rated. I just happen to be one of those compulsive types who wants to finish a job into which I'd already invested some time, and, in this case, to understand the story behind it. Again, that store manager never cited "policy." He was offensive and insulting, and he physically removed from my possession an object which, to my mind, I had more right to hold than he. Thank you Marty for actually understanding my posts.
Capt - 22 Feb 2006 06:47 GMT The manager was an a.s. He wanted to play big shot with his title and be the manager of the situation. It's too bad, those are the things that make people drop a carrier is experiences like that. You had more calmness then I would have, at least the cell phone made it back to the owner.
>>>Considering the recent spate of news stories related to identity theft >>>and/or fraud via cell phone records, sounds like this store manager has [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > I had more right to hold than he. Thank you Marty for actually > understanding my posts. Cliff - 24 Feb 2006 06:15 GMT > Somewhere around Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:44:34 -0600, while reading > alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from Jer [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > I usually like to ask myself "What would Jesus do in a case like this?" > But then I decided Jesus probably didn't have a cell phone. Now really. Let's all take a moment and think about this. A person walks into a store and says " I found this phone. Would you charge it and give it back to me so in case the owner wants it he can come to me and get it?"
Would you want the store manager to give someone a working phone that was not his after he (the store manager) charged it up? And as has been said in previous posts, if he released the phone back to Ron then he has violated policy. And we won't even mention possible suits be the original owner over privacy violations should it ever come out that the manager charged the phone and then gave it back to the person that found it. And who would pay for the calls to Nigeria, that's what I want to know.
Isaiah Beard - 23 Feb 2006 22:06 GMT > I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a > neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info > from it. I put a sign on my house and posted a note on a town Yahoo > list. No takers. The phone said "Cingular" on it, so I took it to the > nearest dealer, Which is what you should have done in the first place.
> asked them to charge it a bit so I could get the > number. Turns out it was the manager who waited on me. He said he can [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > is at the store and they could call to claim it. But he didn't give > them my name or number. Which is exactly what he was supposed to do, and should do.
> I wanted the neighbor to know who found it, Why? So you found a lost cell phone and returned it. Why is it absolutely imperative that the neighbor know it was you who returned it?
> and > I also figured the phone was mine if no one actually claimed it. So if I find your car parked on the street, I guess that automatically makes it mine? Of course not, because the car has been registered by an established authoritative body (the state DMV) that lists you as the registered owner of the vehicle. Even if you abandon the car for a whole year, I still have no claim to the car whatsoever, and the car is still under your ownership and your responsibility.
The phone you "found" did not belong to you, and you have no claim of possession of it. Unfortunately for you, "finders keepers" is not the rule of the land in situations where ownership of property is documented and traceable. The IMEI of the phone is, similar to the car analogy, registered in a database that allows Cingular to trace the phone back to its owner, and that means the phone STILL belongs to its owner, even if they appear to have abandoned it.
>I > asked for it back and told him to give them my number if they called. > He refused. I would have refused, too!
> He kept giving me a line about how the owner > was a Cingular customer and he would make sure they got the phone. When > I argued that I wanted to do that, that I wanted to close the loop > myself, and that frankly I trusted myself to do it better than I trusted > him, he said let's call the police and have them settle it. You have to understand a few things.
First, the manager of the Cingular store is just as suspicious that YOU won't close the loop as much as you *claim* to be that HE won't close the loop.
Second, you've done your part. Accept it! You've returned the phone to a place where any reasonable person would expect that efforts would be made to return the property to its rightful owner. The phone's IMEI is registered to its owner, and presumably, if the owner was that concerned about their phone, they could request that Cingular blacklist the phone's IMEI so that no one else can use it UNTIL it is returned to them.
You also saw the manager make a reasonable effort to contact the owner. That, I think, is proof enough that he wants to get phone and owner reunited. He has no reason to give YOU the owner's info. In fact, he has a separate obligation to protect the owner's privacy, and by witholding the owner's information he was doing just that. Besides, if the manager is as unscrupulous as you think he is, then really, that's between him and Cingular.
Third, if the phone's owner had insurance and he or she made a claim on the phone and got a replacement, then technically it's no longer their property. Rather, the found phone now belongs to the insurance company, and thus it's the obligation of the Cingular store manager to return the phone to insurance company, NOT the owner. YOU do not know the status of that phone. The Cingular manager does. Therefore he is in the best position to do what is right, NOT you.
And finally, your actions quite frankly smack of suspicious and ulterior motives. A truly good deed done doesn't require that any lavishing of praise be bestowed upon the doer, and it appears that you're holding out for some kind of special acknowledgement from the owner, or some kind of reward. Sometimes rewards are offered, and that's great! In fact, if I wanted something returned to me, *I* would offer a reward. But, you are not automatically *entitled* to that sort of thing, so you should not expect anything of the kind. And if you ARE expecting that sort of thing, then maybe the world would have been better off if you left this "found" phone exactly where you "found" it.
Or, for all I know (and for all the Cingular store manager knows) you could be some creepy guy with an stalker's obsession towards this person, and your "finding" of the phone was really a ruse to get this person's personal info. In which case, it's the Cingular store manager who deserves the reward, not you.
He
> disappeared into the back. I waited 10 minutes and he didn't return. > Finally I sent msg in with another employee to write me a receipt for [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > he wants to recycle the phone into their business if it is not > claimed? I can't think of any other reason he would insist on keeping it.
 Signature E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
Jer - 24 Feb 2006 02:01 GMT >> I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured >> a neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > person's personal info. In which case, it's the Cingular store manager > who deserves the reward, not you. Altogether sing now... ah...1...anna 2...anna 3...
For he's a jolly good fella, For he's a jolly good fella, For he's a jolly good fella-a-a-a, That nobody can deny! Hugs.
There ya go Ron. Better now?
 Signature jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'
Andy S - 24 Feb 2006 02:33 GMT >>> Ron wrote: A tale of woe about not getting satisfation from a Cingular Corp. Store manager
>> Isaiah Beard wrote: A well thought out, and appropriate managerial actions, responce.
> Altogether sing now... ah...1...anna 2...anna 3... > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > There ya go Ron. Better now? Ron is better. I guess. He just wanted to do it himself. NO middle man. The middle man in this case did the right thing. Ron didn't like it. Methinks there's more to the story.
MY opinion.
 Signature Andrew D. Sisson LG VX8100 VZW<BAM<FRONTIER CELLULAR<ROCHESTER TEL. MOBILE SID 154 EV-DO PRL 50463 SINCE APRIL 1993
w_t@cox.net - 24 Feb 2006 04:02 GMT And "Jer" once again gets that 1 last "Jer Jab" in. Lets all count how many times he can respond and put in his own whopping 2 cents in before he gets tired of hearing himself. ;) Can that happen???? Lets wait and see. To Be Continued
>>> I found a Motorola cell phone at the end of my front walk. I figured a >>> neighbor lost it jogging. Battery was dead so I couldn't get any info [quoted text clipped - 102 lines] > > There ya go Ron. Better now? John Navas - 24 Feb 2006 19:17 GMT >The phone you "found" did not belong to you, and you have no claim of >possession of it. Unfortunately for you, "finders keepers" is not the >rule of the land in situations where ownership of property is documented >and traceable. True.
>The IMEI of the phone is, similar to the car analogy, >registered in a database that allows Cingular to trace the phone back to >its owner, and that means the phone STILL belongs to its owner, even if >they appear to have abandoned it. In the case of GSM, it's actually the SIM that's registered to the account holder, and the identification is the IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identity). <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMSI> The carrier may or may not have a record of the phone (IMEI) itself, depending on how it was purchased (carrier or third-party) and whether it's insured or not.
Your other points are likely nonetheless valid, since the carrier can trace a GSM handset back to its owner if a valid SIM for that carrier is installed in the handset.
 Signature Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
|
|
|